Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Hi, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5186896.stm Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Maybe as other mass transit systems use, eg, New York, a hard rigid plastic. Still comfortable to sit on given that you are only on it briefly !!! and not holding hidden all kinds of gunk that must be embedded in the fabric..... Just Wondered ! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Craig wrote:
Hi, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5186896.stm Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Maybe as other mass transit systems use, eg, New York, a hard rigid plastic. Still comfortable to sit on given that you are only on it briefly !!! and not holding hidden all kinds of gunk that must be embedded in the fabric..... Just Wondered ! Plastic seats, no way! I think they would be less pleasant and less acceptable. I don't think there's any real hygiene problem at all either. I always find this desire to try and ensure everything is microscopically sanitised is pretty pointless and unachievable. Microscopic organisms are an essential part of life on earth. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Craig wrote: Hi, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5186896.stm Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Maybe as other mass transit systems use, eg, New York, a hard rigid plastic. Still comfortable to sit on given that you are only on it briefly !!! and not holding hidden all kinds of gunk that must be embedded in the fabric..... Just Wondered ! Plastic seats, no way! I think they would be less pleasant and less acceptable. I don't think there's any real hygiene problem at all either. New Yorkers might accept plastic seats on their subway trains, but I doubt very much Londoners would!!! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Stevo wrote: Mizter T wrote: Craig wrote: Hi, http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/5186896.stm Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Maybe as other mass transit systems use, eg, New York, a hard rigid plastic. Still comfortable to sit on given that you are only on it briefly !!! and not holding hidden all kinds of gunk that must be embedded in the fabric..... Just Wondered ! Plastic seats, no way! I think they would be less pleasant and less acceptable. I don't think there's any real hygiene problem at all either. New Yorkers might accept plastic seats on their subway trains, but I doubt very much Londoners would!!! It's not like they'd have any choice. They've "accepted" the appalling layout on the Jubilee, where one person can stand in the space occupied by two flip up seats on similar Northern Line stock (because there is no allowance for the top half of the body of a standing passenger, nor the fact that you can't lean on the head of an adjacent seated passenger). I haven't seen the mockup yet, but the diagrams in MR suggested that these obvious shortcomings might have been recognised at last, ie that space needs to be divided efficiently into passenger sized chunks that allow a person to balance without leaning on someone else, whether standing or not, and that wide open space is not necessarily usable. And that people have top halves to their bodies. And that people leaning against a sloping wall have to balance by splaying their legs out further than they would if sitting in a flip up seat. Similar things could be learned about the 376s on SET. Come to think about it, maybe the aliens who designed all these trains should be given lessons in human anatomy. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
MIG ) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying : Come to think about it, maybe the aliens who designed all these trains should be given lessons in human anatomy. Or just made to use the trains every day...? |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stevo wrote:
(snip) New Yorkers might accept plastic seats on their subway trains, but I doubt very much Londoners would!!! I actually think plastic seats would create a more amenable or attractive environment for vandalism. Bizarrely, on some London Central buses on the top-deck the back three rows (i.e. the rear-most forward facing, the accompanying backward facing and then the next forward facing rows) are plastic seats. I don't now why this is - perhaps because the occupants of said seats are frequently shifty characters who might be considered more prone to commit vandalism, though I can't see that really being the thinking behind it. However if that really is the logic behind these platic seats then it's a self fulfilling prophecy - said back plastic seats are often the most dirty (more so than the back of other buses), sometimes with the addition of marker pen graffiti on the seats themselves (which I admit absurdly also occurs on fabric seats, but much less frequently). Anyway, thankfully, plastic seats are definitely not on the agenda whatsoever. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mizter T wrote:
Bizarrely, on some London Central buses on the top-deck the back three rows (i.e. the rear-most forward facing, the accompanying backward facing and then the next forward facing rows) are plastic seats. If you check the floor, you'll see holes that allow water (or other liquids) to drain out. Now I presume people at night have a tendancy to throw up, or urinate on the bus, hence the plastic seats and the drains. Or, perhaps it is so the bus company can literally jet wash them in the depot. Or, both! ISTR that some have stuck on fabric and, IME, aren't that uncomfortable even without any real padding. Probably only good for a 10-20 minute journey though. Jonathan |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Jonathan Morris wrote: Mizter T wrote: Bizarrely, on some London Central buses on the top-deck the back three rows (i.e. the rear-most forward facing, the accompanying backward facing and then the next forward facing rows) are plastic seats. If you check the floor, you'll see holes that allow water (or other liquids) to drain out. Now I presume people at night have a tendancy to throw up, or urinate on the bus, hence the plastic seats and the drains. Or, perhaps it is so the bus company can literally jet wash them in the depot. Or, both! ISTR that some have stuck on fabric and, IME, aren't that uncomfortable even without any real padding. Probably only good for a 10-20 minute journey though. And I am sure I am not the only person ever to have sat down heavily on one of these disguised plastic seats and bruised myself. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 Jul 2006 05:19:31 -0700, Mizter T wrote:
Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Plastic seats, no way! I think they would be less pleasant and less acceptable. I don't think there's any real hygiene problem at all either. I always find this desire to try and ensure everything is microscopically sanitised is pretty pointless and unachievable. Microscopic organisms are an essential part of life on earth. Indeed. Some of this tube seat hygiene mania may be traced to a hoax email that was doing the rounds a few years ago: http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/london.asp |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() asdf wrote: On 17 Jul 2006 05:19:31 -0700, Mizter T wrote: Just wondered if anyone else thinks it would be far more hygenic, more pleasant & acceptable if the decision to no longer cover seats on new trains in fabric was made. Plastic seats, no way! I think they would be less pleasant and less acceptable. I don't think there's any real hygiene problem at all either. I always find this desire to try and ensure everything is microscopically sanitised is pretty pointless and unachievable. Microscopic organisms are an essential part of life on earth. Indeed. Some of this tube seat hygiene mania may be traced to a hoax email that was doing the rounds a few years ago: http://www.snopes.com/medical/disease/london.asp In any case, I think fabric reverts to being sittable on faster after spillages than a plastic seat on which puddles of goo would have no way of dissipating. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Pa on new victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
Seats on London Overground and the new Victoria Line trains | London Transport | |||
New victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
New victoria line trains | London Transport | |||
More details on new victoria line trains...... | London Transport |