Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#14
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 1 Aug 2006, Dave Arquati wrote:
Bob wrote: to turn round of half the trains at Paddington which seems a wasted opportunity - taking over the Hammersmith end of the H&C removes a busy junction on the Circle Line with knock on effects for that lines reliability would seem a low cost no brainer. I agree, but I think ensuring the central tunnel gets built is most important - adding on too many extra bits here and there could kill the whole project. Hammersmith could come later... Except Hammersmith involves noodling about quite near the Paddington portal (if you want to have a station at Royal Oak, or if you want to use the existing H&C fly-under, at any rate), so if you don't at least build in the possibility at the start, you might not be able to do it later. tom -- Understanding the universe is the final purpose, as far as I'm concerned. -- Ian York |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Green light for Woolwich Crossrail station | London Transport | |||
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail | London Transport | |||
Crossrail Select Committee adds Woolwich station to scheme | London Transport News | |||
Canning Town - North Woolwich | London Transport | |||
DLR extension to woolwich | London Transport |