![]() |
Quiestest station
C wrote:
"THC" wrote in message oups.com... C wrote: I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line. It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused stations". Wake up at the back. THC Yeah but its not a tube station. You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group covers all transport in London. Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for 2005), Heathrow Terminal 4. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005 -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Quiestest station
"Richard J." wrote in message . uk... C wrote: "THC" wrote in message oups.com... C wrote: I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line. It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused stations". Wake up at the back. THC Yeah but its not a tube station. You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group covers all transport in London. Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for 2005), Heathrow Terminal 4. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005 -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) Sorry I should of made it clear. |
Quiestest station
On Mon, 01 Jan 2007 12:07:21 GMT, "C"
wrote: "Richard J." wrote in message .uk... C wrote: "THC" wrote in message oups.com... C wrote: I take it thats a mainline train station - North London line. It was. The clue is given in the URL for the link - "disused stations". Wake up at the back. THC Yeah but its not a tube station. You didn't say you were only interested in tube stations. This group covers all transport in London. Quietest tube station: according to the latest official figures (for 2005), Heathrow Terminal 4. http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tube/company/p...18&agekey=2005 Ha! Yes, i can see that :) Sorry I should of made it clear. No, you should *have* made it clear. |
Quiestest station
C wrote in message
: Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Given the volume of people who travel to/from Heathrow, I wonder if a lot of them are using Heathrow Express, either all the way to Paddington or else between T4 and T123 where they change to Picadilly line. Presumably the quietest Underground station in all senses of the word "quietest" is Alwdych: not only is it disused but (unlike Museum, Down Street, Marlborough Road etc) it is also on a closed line so it doesn't even have any trains passing through it. |
Quiestest station
Martin Underwood wrote:
C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Quietest station
Richard J. wrote in message
: Martin Underwood wrote: C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-) PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't believe I didn't spot that till now! |
Quietest station
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message ... Richard J. wrote in message : Martin Underwood wrote: C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-) PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't believe I didn't spot that till now! So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley? |
Quietest station
C wrote:
"Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message ... Richard J. wrote in message : Martin Underwood wrote: C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-) PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't believe I didn't spot that till now! So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley? [sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I think it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't seem to have registered in the stats.) Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for 2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has the fewest passengers. You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading answers! Happy New Year. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
Quietest station
"Richard J." wrote in message k... C wrote: "Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message ... Richard J. wrote in message : Martin Underwood wrote: C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-) PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't believe I didn't spot that till now! So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley? [sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I think it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't seem to have registered in the stats.) Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for 2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has the fewest passengers. You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading answers! Happy New Year. -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) Sorry for being so vague.......am I forgiven? |
Quietest station
C wrote:
"Richard J." wrote in message k... C wrote: "Martin Underwood" a@b wrote in message ... Richard J. wrote in message : Martin Underwood wrote: C wrote in message : Sorry I should of made it clear. And you should *have* said "should have", not "should of" ;-) I'm surprised that Heathrow T4 is the quietest Underground station. Read my post again. It *was* the quietest station in 2005. Remember this? .... http://www.tuberelief.co.uk/images/heathrow.jpg Ah. Sorry. Your posting just referred to "latest official figures (for 2005)", without drawing attention to 2005 being a special year for T4 station. Now I understand ;-) PS: I've corrected "quiestest" to "quietest" in the thread title - can't believe I didn't spot that till now! So Heathrow Terminal 4 gets less passengers than Rodney Valley? [sigh] I suppose I have to spell this out to you. In the last set of official stats from LU, which were for the year 2005, Terminal 4 was listed as having NO passengers (which you would have realised if you had followed the links I provided) because it was closed all year while the junction to the new Terminal 5 station was constructed. (Actually I think it operated for the first week of January 2005, but that doesn't seem to have registered in the stats.) Now that Terminal 4 is open again, and based on other station stats for 2005, it is likely that Roding Valley (NOT Rodney Valley) currently has the fewest passengers. You need to be more precise in wording questions of this sort in this group if you are to avoid being misled by correct but misleading answers! Happy New Year. Sorry for being so vague.......am I forgiven? It's still (just) the festive season, so, yes! -- Richard J. (to e-mail me, swap uk and yon in address) |
All times are GMT. The time now is 06:02 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk