Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote in message
: Tom Anderson wrote: I have at no point advocated renaming anything - i was merely pointing out that for some people, the Empire was a Very Bad Thing, and thus that celebrating it is a bit of a slap in the face to them. I don't see how the title of a museum about war and weapons could avoid upsetting anyone. Well, i wouldn't rename anything (well, i would, but not because of this - having two stations called Edgware Road is intolerable, for example). Since there are three huge roads called Edgware Road in London, and none of them is actually in Edgware, having even one station called Edgware Road is intolerable! So you'd advocate renaming Oxford Street, York Way/Road and Liverpool Street as well, would you? I do agree that on the ground of cpnfusion, there should only be one station with each name: Edgware Road, Shepherd's Bush and Hammersmith are candidates for this rationalisation. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Martin Underwood wrote:
John Rowland wrote in message Since there are three huge roads called Edgware Road in London, and none of them is actually in Edgware, having even one station called Edgware Road is intolerable! So you'd advocate renaming Oxford Street, York Way/Road and Liverpool Street as well, would you? Oxford Street station was renamed a long time ago, and I do believe it should be renamed again to St Giles. I am not aware of a station called York Way, and renaming York Rd station would not pass a cost benefit analysis these days. As for Liverpool St, yes, it should be renamed, particularly since a number of stations which have trains to London Liverpool St also have trains to Liverpool Lime St. cpnfusion Huh? ;-) there should only be one station with each name: Edgware Road, Shepherd's Bush and Hammersmith are candidates for this rationalisation. I agree where the Shepherds Bushes are concerned because they are in quite different places. I see no benefit in giving the Edgware Roads separate names - I think they should both have the same name but a different one to the one they have now. Hammersmith is fine - it's not the best interchange on the map, but it isn't the worst either, and giving the stations different names would only con people into avoiding interchanging there, thus wasting their time and perhaps money. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland wrote:
Hammersmith is fine - it's not the best interchange on the map, but it isn't the worst either, and giving the stations different names would only con people into avoiding interchanging there, thus wasting their time and perhaps money. Like Bank/Monument? I think it would be far better to make the names separate and put in notations of distance to nearby stations much as Covent Garden has for Leicester Square, and several stations have for nearby unconnected NR stations. -- Michael Hoffman |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 28 Feb 2007, John Rowland wrote:
Martin Underwood wrote: John Rowland wrote in message Since there are three huge roads called Edgware Road in London, and none of them is actually in Edgware, having even one station called Edgware Road is intolerable! So you'd advocate renaming Oxford Street, York Way/Road and Liverpool Street as well, would you? Oxford Street station was renamed a long time ago, and I do believe it should be renamed again to St Giles. I am not aware of a station called York Way, and renaming York Rd station would not pass a cost benefit analysis these days. I dunno - the cost side would be quite small, as there aren't exactly a lot of signs to change. As for Liverpool St, yes, it should be renamed, particularly since a number of stations which have trains to London Liverpool St also have trains to Liverpool Lime St. Okay. What to? And why not just rename Liverpool instead? cpnfusion Huh? ;-) pwned! there should only be one station with each name: Edgware Road, Shepherd's Bush and Hammersmith are candidates for this rationalisation. I agree where the Shepherds Bushes are concerned because they are in quite different places. I see no benefit in giving the Edgware Roads separate names "Meet you at the front of Edgware Road station at half past six." - I think they should both have the same name but a different one to the one they have now. That seems uniquely perverse. Hammersmith is fine - it's not the best interchange on the map, but it isn't the worst either, and giving the stations different names would only con people into avoiding interchanging there, thus wasting their time and perhaps money. I take it Hammersmith is an official out-of-station interchange. ISTR that, surprisingly, the trip between the Edgware Roads isn't. Is that right? tom -- packaheomg sogma's |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 28, 2:34 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote: Martin Underwood wrote: John Rowland wrote in message Since there are three huge roads called Edgware Road in London, and none of them is actually in Edgware, having even one station called Edgware Road is intolerable! So you'd advocate renaming Oxford Street, York Way/Road and Liverpool Street as well, would you? Oxford Street station was renamed a long time ago, and I do believe it should be renamed again to St Giles. I am not aware of a station called York Way, and renaming York Rd station would not pass a cost benefit analysis these days. As for Liverpool St, yes, it should be renamed, particularly since a number of stations which have trains to London Liverpool St also have trains to Liverpool Lime St. cpnfusion Huh? ;-) there should only be one station with each name: Edgware Road, Shepherd's Bush and Hammersmith are candidates for this rationalisation. I agree where the Shepherds Bushes are concerned because they are in quite different places. I see no benefit in giving the Edgware Roads separate names - I think they should both have the same name but a different one to the one they have now. Hammersmith is fine - it's not the best interchange on the map, but it isn't the worst either, and giving the stations different names would only con people into avoiding interchanging there, thus wasting their time and perhaps money. Following the examples of towns in Kent, the Hammersmith stations should be renamed Hammersmith East and Hammersmith West. And the Shepherds Bush stations should be renamed Shepherds Bush North and Shepherds Bush South (take your pick which is which). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
London Transport Museum exhibition - "Selling the suburbs" (BBCNews) | London Transport | |||
London or London's Transport Museum | London Transport | |||
Friends of London Transport Museum eBay Auction | London Transport | |||
Reminder - London Transport Museum Depot Open Weekend | London Transport | |||
London Transport Museum Closing | London Transport |