Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single
to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 2:20 pm, "Terry Casey" wrote:
I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry But you can't get to Southall by underground! So unless the inspector was saying your friend should have taken the bus from Ealing Broadway he seems to have been spouting nonsense. I don't think it's 'one's' fault. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Feb 25, 2:34�pm, wrote:
On Feb 25, 2:20 pm, "Terry Casey" wrote: I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Terry But you can't get to Southall by underground! So unless the inspector was saying your friend should have taken the bus from Ealing Broadway he seems to have been spouting nonsense. I don't think it's 'one's' fault. It depends what was asked for. If he asked for "a single to Southall" at Goodmayes, the ticket should have said "From GOODMAYES To SOUTHALL Route + Any Permitted", and would have cost �5.10. If the final destination is an NR station then the actual station (or, occasionally station group, eg Croydon) must be shown on the ticket. What the purchaser was sold was a ticket to U1234, ie from Goodmayes to a final destination on the Underground in zone 4, involving an Underground journey through zones 1-4, for example Goodmayes to Perivale. Since the introduction of Zonal fares, the cost is the same, but the validity is different. FGW do not get any money from the U1234 ticket, so, quite rightly, they refused the ticket. As I don't know what exactly was asked for, although the OP did say the words "Underground" and "Zone 4" were mentioned, it's difficult to know who was at fault. I suspect, however, that the booking clerk, on hearing the words "Southall in Zone 4", assumed that Southall was on the Underground and sold that ticket. Incidentally, if it was after 0930, a zone 1-4 ODTC at �5.70 may have been a better value option. Moral of the story: Keep it simple. If you want a single to Southall, say so. Don't confuse matters by mentioning zones or the Underground. If an Underground transfer is required, the ticket issuing system will know this. Ken |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ken" wrote in message oups.com... On Feb 25, 2:34?pm, wrote: As I don't know what exactly was asked for, although the OP did say the words "Underground" and "Zone 4" were mentioned, it's difficult to know who was at fault. I suspect, however, that the booking clerk, on hearing the words "Southall in Zone 4", assumed that Southall was on the Underground and sold that ticket. Incidentally, if it was after 0930, a zone 1-4 ODTC at ?5.70 may have been a better value option. Moral of the story: Keep it simple. If you want a single to Southall, say so. Don't confuse matters by mentioning zones or the Underground. If an Underground transfer is required, the ticket issuing system will know this. Ken ------------------------------ My friend asked for a single to Southall, nothing more (at 0720). It was the inspector at Southall who first used the word "Underground" and only then did my friend refer to the zones printed on the ticket, so there was no customer confusion at the Goodmayes end! Terry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:20:00 GMT, "Terry Casey"
wrote: A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? Not 100% certain but from the details given and what I've read I would say he's been charged the right fare by "one" but issued the wrong ticket. At present prices are zonal but tickets are issued from "a to b" which means it should have said Goodmayes to Southall on it and not U1234. This ticket only gives validity to Liv St and then onto the LU network as far as zone 4. I think the FGW ticket person did the right thing (in terms of challenging the incorrectly issued ticket) based on the ticket description but was obviously not prepared to listen or show any discretion or even call up Goodmayes to ask if they had issued the ticket in question. I think the complaint goes to "one" re ticket issuing error and possibly to FGW if your friend considers his treatment to be rude or ill mannered. I'm not sure either company comes out of this very well. I also suspect the training on how to issue these revised tickets is not what it should be but then the whole thing is a complex nightmare - I could never do the job of a NR booking clerk. -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:44:54 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote:
Not 100% certain but from the details given and what I've read I would say he's been charged the right fare by "one" but issued the wrong ticket. At present prices are zonal but tickets are issued from "a to b" which means it should have said Goodmayes to Southall on it and not U1234. After a close reading of the NFM (and though at first I got the same impression as Barry Salter) I think you're right here. Both tickets are Train Tube Singles, but such a ticket issued to U1234 is only valid for journeys that end at an LU/DLR station. This ticket only gives validity to Liv St and then onto the LU network as far as zone 4. To be pedantic, I don't think this is true, strictly speaking. I reckon it would be valid for a journey such as: 'one' to Liverpool Street; Tube to Victoria; Southern to Balham; Tube to Morden. (Basically, by any combination of LU and NR within the zones on the ticket, as long as you end up at an LU/DLR station. It may or may not be hidden somewhere in some Conditions of Carriage that your route also has to be "reasonable".) However, if your ticket started from a station outside the zones (e.g. Chelmsford to U1234) then it *wouldn't* be a Train Tube Single, and the usual pre-Jan-2006 rules apply, i.e. you *would* be restricted to the LU/DLR network (and interavailable routes) once you got to Liverpool Street (or Stratford, if you changed there). |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 05:17:16 +0000, asdf
wrote: On Sun, 25 Feb 2007 14:44:54 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote: Not 100% certain but from the details given and what I've read I would say he's been charged the right fare by "one" but issued the wrong ticket. At present prices are zonal but tickets are issued from "a to b" which means it should have said Goodmayes to Southall on it and not U1234. After a close reading of the NFM (and though at first I got the same impression as Barry Salter) I think you're right here. Both tickets are Train Tube Singles, but such a ticket issued to U1234 is only valid for journeys that end at an LU/DLR station. Having read the NFM details I'm sure I am correct. This ticket only gives validity to Liv St and then onto the LU network as far as zone 4. To be pedantic, I don't think this is true, strictly speaking. I reckon it would be valid for a journey such as: 'one' to Liverpool Street; Tube to Victoria; Southern to Balham; Tube to Morden. Sorry but I think you are wrong with this example. Victoria to Balham is not interavailable so is in effect another TOC journey. I doubt very much that the ticket would work the gates on the interchange at Victoria or at Balham. I appreciate the NFM cites the above link in an example but only for tickets issued from London Terminals to U1234 - this is fine as it covers Southern to Balham and then a continuation on LU to Morden. A ticket purchaser would have to decide whether they wished to use NR and then only LU to reach Balham or else buy a ticket from their origin to Balham (NR) and then rebook to Morden. Other than a One Day Travelcard I do not think there is a ticket that allows NR - LU - NR - LU as a set of journey legs where the NR legs are not interavailable with a LU service. (Basically, by any combination of LU and NR within the zones on the ticket, as long as you end up at an LU/DLR station. It may or may not be hidden somewhere in some Conditions of Carriage that your route also has to be "reasonable".) The rules say "any permitted" route but subject to the differing basic availabilities of NR Zonal and Train Tube Zonal products. However, if your ticket started from a station outside the zones (e.g. Chelmsford to U1234) then it *wouldn't* be a Train Tube Single, and the usual pre-Jan-2006 rules apply, i.e. you *would* be restricted to the LU/DLR network (and interavailable routes) once you got to Liverpool Street (or Stratford, if you changed there). You'd be restricted to the TfL rail network within the zones requested on your ticket. The NFM extract also says you could effectively ask for a London terminals to "U" combination where there was not a through fare to "U" defined in the ticketing system. I think I'm glad I'm not a booking clerk! -- Paul C Admits to working for London Underground! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007 18:13:34 +0000, Paul Corfield wrote:
This ticket only gives validity to Liv St and then onto the LU network as far as zone 4. To be pedantic, I don't think this is true, strictly speaking. I reckon it would be valid for a journey such as: 'one' to Liverpool Street; Tube to Victoria; Southern to Balham; Tube to Morden. Sorry but I think you are wrong with this example. Victoria to Balham is not interavailable so is in effect another TOC journey. Yes, I deliberately chose an example that was not interavailable. A ticket purchaser would have to decide whether they wished to use NR and then only LU to reach Balham or else buy a ticket from their origin to Balham (NR) and then rebook to Morden. Other than a One Day Travelcard I do not think there is a ticket that allows NR - LU - NR - LU as a set of journey legs where the NR legs are not interavailable with a LU service. OK, I couldn't see any reason why you couldn't do NR-LU-NR-LU within the zones on your ticket, but I suppose it doesn't explicitly say you *can* either, so you'd be taking your chances with what the RPIs would accept. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Terry Casey" wrote in message ... A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? The correct ticket is a SDS Goodmayes - Southall for £5.10. A SDS Goodmayes - Zone U1234 is £4.40 and would only be valid at Underground stations in zone 4. So it seems that One sold the cheaper ticket at the more expensive price for some reason and they are at fault (although FGW probably should have given your friend the benefit of the doubt). Peter Smyth |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Peter Smyth" wrote in message ... "Terry Casey" wrote in message ... A friend went to Goodmayes station on Friday morning and asked for a single to Southall, for which he was charged £5.10. He set off via Liverpool Street and Paddington but when he got to Southall he was told his ticket was invalid and he would have to pay again - £3.10. He explained that he had asked for a ticket to Southall and pointed out that the ticket included zone 4 (both Goodmayes and Southall being in zone 4.) No, he was told, it was only valid on the underground and he would have to pay again - £3.10 please! In that case, he asked, could he just pay from Ealing Broadway and was told that, as he had already admitted travelling from Paddington, the suggestion could trigger a £20 penalty charge! £20 or £3.10 - take your pick, he was told! He elected for the £3.10 option and, to add insult to injury, a comment from another passenger as he left the station made it clear that, in that person's eyes at least, he had been caught for fraudulently evading his fare! He is understandably livid and, when he told me about it, was going to take it up with 'one', who issued the ticket. However, I am not sure that this is the right way to go. His ticket is a Standard Day Single to U1234, valid by any available route and, on checking the NR website for details of the new zonal fare structure, I note that £5.10 is the correct fare for his journey, including the underground. I am assuming that the U in U1234 means that the ticket is also valid on the underground (to differentiate it from the £3.10 ticket which isn't) but, presumably, at Southall it is taken to mean that it is ONLY valid on the underground! Unless there is a way that he could have been sold the wrong ticket for the correct fare at Goodmayes, I feel he has been the victim of First Great Western incompetence and that it is to FGW that he should complain. Is my assumption correct? The correct ticket is a SDS Goodmayes - Southall for £5.10. A SDS Goodmayes - Zone U1234 is £4.40 and would only be valid at Underground stations in zone 4. So it seems that One sold the cheaper ticket at the more expensive price for some reason and they are at fault (although FGW probably should have given your friend the benefit of the doubt). Peter Smyth I took the details off the ticket itself and it definitely shows the price as £5.10 - surely it would be impossible to issue the wrong ticket at the correct price (unless there is a software problem or programming error.) Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Another Oyster Rip-off | London Transport | |||
2for1 Ticket Rip-off | London Transport | |||
Zonal Fare Exceptions | London Transport | |||
Microsoft's rip-off of Google Earth | London Transport | |||
Southern "Fare Pal" / zonal fares | London Transport |