Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 Oct, 17:58, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Mr Thant wrote: On 9 Oct, 16:44, Tom Anderson wrote: (snip) It got me thinking, though - maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to resurrect that route. When the DLR branch to Stratford along the old NLL is done, this branch will become slightly redundant (still useful for commuting from points on it to Stratford, but not necessary for access from Stratford to Docklands) Trains on the new branch will only be able to head east (ie towards Beckton or Woolwich), the opposite way to the existing branch. Oh bugger. That seems somehow perverse; i suppose the point is to provide a route from people's houses in those areas to their jobs in Stratford, rather than to lay on yet more trains to Docklands. The DLR remains a big huge mystery to me. tom Why is the DLR such a mystery to you? It's a local light-rail system and a very popular one at that. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Mizter T wrote:
On 9 Oct, 17:58, Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, Mr Thant wrote: On 9 Oct, 16:44, Tom Anderson wrote: It got me thinking, though - maybe it wouldn't be a bad idea to resurrect that route. When the DLR branch to Stratford along the old NLL is done, this branch will become slightly redundant (still useful for commuting from points on it to Stratford, but not necessary for access from Stratford to Docklands) Trains on the new branch will only be able to head east (ie towards Beckton or Woolwich), the opposite way to the existing branch. Oh bugger. That seems somehow perverse; i suppose the point is to provide a route from people's houses in those areas to their jobs in Stratford, rather than to lay on yet more trains to Docklands. The DLR remains a big huge mystery to me. Why is the DLR such a mystery to you? It's a local light-rail system and a very popular one at that. Absolutely! But where do the people come from? Where are they going? Why are they going there? I guess what i really don't understand is the distribuion of people and jobs in that part of London, and which people where have go what jobs where and that sort of thing. And how much of the traffic is not commuting, and what it in fact is, etc. tom -- NO REAL THAN YOU ARE -- The Zandvoort Man |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Oct, 16:53, Tom Anderson wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Mizter T wrote: (snip) Why is the DLR such a mystery to you? It's a local light-rail system and a very popular one at that. Absolutely! But where do the people come from? Where are they going? Why are they going there? I guess what i really don't understand is the distribution of people and jobs in that part of London, and which people where have go what jobs where and that sort of thing. And how much of the traffic is not commuting, and what it in fact is, etc. tom That's a fair question. One could get all Daily Mail-esque and put forward the notion that a number of these passengers during the daytime aren't going to or from work but are supported by the state in some way and are spending their days doing other things. No doubt, I think there's perhaps a grain of truth in that (esp. given the rates of unemployment in parts of east London) - but it comes from the slightly outdated perspective where most people worked weekdays 9-5 (or similar). There's shift work that starts and stops at all times during the day, people with days off, people working unpredictable hours. There's a lot of students as well - the Uni of East London has campuses in Stratford and by the Royal Docks (Cyprus). A friends who worked there for a while said that many of the youngsters who enrolled did so simply because it was something to do, and the drop-out rate was very high. Plus of course it's not all commuting - as you note. They're been times when my main use of public transport is has been for any purpose apart from getting to/from work, when I've been cycling in. Shopping, leisure etc. Anyway in many places in London public transport is fairly well used throughout the day - it's not just the DLR, it's the Underground (not just central London) and the overground (radial and orbital routes) - so you can equally well ask what all those people are doing. They're doing what people do in this modern age - moving around. Lots. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
That's a fair question. One could get all Daily Mail-esque and put
forward the notion that a number of these passengers during the daytime aren't going to or from work but are supported by the state in some way and are spending their days doing other things. Because of course, the kinds of people who work in the docklands have jobs and incomes that make them chained to their desks all day, never having meetings anywhere else, working lunches, etc....? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underground grammar fail | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |