Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Mizter T wrote:
On 10 Oct, 06:03, Tom Anderson wrote: On Tue, 9 Oct 2007, lonelytraveller wrote: I thought the NLL was being cannibalised - the north and west bits to Dalston for Orbirail (including the far north bit of the ELL extension), the middle bits from Dalston for the Chelsea-Hackney line, and the far east bits beyond Stratford for the DLR? The bit beyond Stratford has indeed gone to the DLR. The NLL is itself part of the Orbirail plan (i hate that name), rather than being a victim of it. There was a suggestion in 1995 for a cheapo Chelney that would assimilate the NLL to Stratford, but that never got any further than a line on a map - and recently, the safeguarding on the 1991 route, which is in tube all the way to Leytonstone, was renewed. If Chelsea-Hackney ever does get built, it seems unlikely that it'll be using the NLL (although who can say, really). Moreover, the NLL as it stands is increasingly popular, for some reason, and i can't see it getting broken up in any way - quite the opposite, more trains, services extended to more remote destinations, etc. The NLL is popular because it takes people where they want to go, Yes, but where are they going, and why are they going there? and does it better than other means (despite the filthy nature of the trains). I still can't quite understand you're dislike for orbital rail routes, especially given that they are liked by large numbers of the travelling public. "People like Coldplay and voted for the Nazis. You can't trust people." ![]() I don't dislike orbital rail routes - i even use them myself from time to time, although of course i wear a false beard when i do so, so people don't recognise me. My irritation stems from a preoccupation with orbital routes that occasionally strikes some people. Yes, the NLL is busy, and the demand would fill more and longer trains - but most of the radial routes have vastly more demand, and are overcrowded despite having ten times the capacity, so to talk about orbital routes as if they were the most important thing is bonkers. Focusing attention and money on the ELL extension, say, diverts it from problems which really are more significant. Yes, i realise that much of the attraction of orbital routes at the moment is the fact that they can be significantly improved for very little money by linking things up and running more trains, but let's just remember they're the low-hanging fruit, not the top banana. tom -- NO REAL THAN YOU ARE -- The Zandvoort Man |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underground grammar fail | London Transport | |||
Boris: Crossrail not yet "signed, sealed and delivered" [was:Transport Secretary vows to finish Crossrail] | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport | |||
Optimum configuration of Crossrail (Was: Diesel Electric Trains on CrossRail) | London Transport |