London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 6th 07, 11:11 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1


http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/



  #2   Report Post  
Old October 6th 07, 11:56 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,146
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

In article ,
(John Rowland) wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/

Why, though?

--
Colin Rosenstiel
  #3   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 11:39 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2007
Posts: 1,139
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,

(John Rowland) wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?

  #4   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 11:48 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

Offramp wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,

(John Rowland) wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?


No.


  #5   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 03:33 PM posted to uk.transport.london
MIG MIG is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,154
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

On Oct 7, 12:48 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote:
Offramp wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,


(John Rowland) wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?


No.


A beacon for film crews from The Bill?



  #6   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 05:37 PM posted to uk.transport.london,alt.boomerang
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2007
Posts: 1,139
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

On Oct 7, 12:48 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote:
Offramp wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,


(John Rowland) wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?


No.


Is it to stop aeroplanes mistaking it for Gatwick?

  #7   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 06:13 PM posted to uk.transport.london,alt.boomerang
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 905
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 17:37:14 -0000, Offramp
wrote:

On Oct 7, 12:48 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote:
Offramp wrote:
On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article ,


(John Rowland) wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?


No.


Is it to stop aeroplanes mistaking it for Gatwick?


You've spent too much time here.
  #8   Report Post  
Old October 7th 07, 10:14 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

Colin Rosenstiel wrote:
In article ,
(John Rowland) wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/

Why, though?


Ours is not to wonder why
Just pay the leccy bill and cry.


  #9   Report Post  
Old October 8th 07, 02:53 PM posted to uk.transport.london,alt.boomerang
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 136
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

Offramp wrote:

On Oct 7, 12:48 pm, "John Rowland"
wrote:

Offramp wrote:

On Oct 7, 12:56 am, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:

In article ,


(John Rowland) wrote:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/getdown/309475951/


Why, though?


Isn't there a nightclub under that bridge?


No.



Is it to stop aeroplanes mistaking it for Gatwick?



I think it is there to stop nightclubbers from mistaking it for
something under another railway viaduct.
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5165652

--
Olof Lagerkvist
ICQ: 724451
Web: http://here.is/olof
  #10   Report Post  
Old October 8th 07, 11:48 PM posted to uk.transport.london,alt.boomerang
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,577
Default Bridge 406, Burrell St SE1

Olof Lagerkvist wrote:

I think it is there to stop nightclubbers from mistaking it for
something under another railway viaduct.
http://www.panoramio.com/photo/5165652


I don't understand what you mean by "another viaduct" - the bridge in the
background in your photo *is* Bridge 406.




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Where to get MOT done in SE1? Chris MacNeil London Transport 1 January 28th 04 10:53 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017