Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 5 Nov 2007 17:51:26 -0000, "tim....."
wrote: "Tom Anderson" wrote in message .li... On Mon, 5 Nov 2007, Mwmbwls quoted: A Transport for London spokesman said: "London Underground (LU) has examined the possibility of extending the Victoria line to Northumberland Park, and this has proved not to be a viable option. The only viable location for a station at Northumberland Park is to the east of the WAGN tracks, which would mean that either large crowds would be using the level crossing or existing narrow footbridge, or that a new footbridge would have to be constructed at great expense. How great an expense could a new footbridge possibly be? Are TfL assuming they'd be paying for it? How much dough could be extracted from Spurs? If it meant they could stay where they were rather than moving to a whole new site, surely they'd be willing to pay quite a bit for it? I have no idea why Spurs want to move, but I would doubt that 'insufficient transport links' is the reason. I suspect that the capacity being only 36k would be the reason. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spurs agree to pay TfL 12m to rename White Lart Lane station asTottenham Hotspur Station | London Transport | |||
Spurs CPZ | London Transport | |||
Looking for your perfect match | London Transport | |||
Want a serious muslim match?Join our club and start searching now!!! | London Transport | |||
Match of the Day 2 | London Transport |