![]() |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West
Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
"Andy" wrote in message ... This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Its a good question, and presumably also relevant to the few Chiltern services that are already timetabled to use Paddington? Paul S |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 25 Jan, 11:47, Andy wrote:
This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. I did think about this issue when I noticed the exact same scenario a few weekends ago. To be honest I very much doubt that there is any provision for Oyster PAYG on these journeys, as I'm pretty sure Oyster PAYG just isn't valid for that route - even when trains are diverted because of planned engineering works. (Besides, I have never come across any type of temporary, portable Oyster reader that could be used for this purpose.) I'd simply suggest that Oyster PAYG is not valid on these services. Whether Chiltern Railways posters will specifically state this information I cannot say - their website's section on planned changes to services certainly doesn't mention Oyster PAYG at all. However might I propose that Chiltern would argue they already have this situation covered, because existing publicity already states that Oyster PAYG is not valid from West/South Ruislip to Paddington. This is explicitly stated on posters at West Ruislip, because there already one train every weekday (the 10.12) from West Ruislip to into Paddington (though the return working does not call at either South or West Ruislip). Chiltern's posters at West Ruislip alert passengers to the fact Oyster PAYG cannot be used on this Paddington-bound train, and therefore they need a paper ticket to use this service. In addition the fact that PAYG cannot (currently) be used into Paddington is shown on the map of valid routes for "Oyster PAYG on National Rail", which should be displayed on posters at stations served by National Rail routes which accept PAYG, and is also widely distributed as a leaflet and can also be found via a link on this page on the National Rail website that details the validity of Oyster on National Rail: http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/times_...ystercard.html Or here's a direct link to that map (PDF): http://www.nationalrail.co.uk/system...OysterPAYG.pdf It's also worth bearing in mind that, with regards to saturdays diverted trains, on the West Ruislip to Paddington stretch of the journey trains are timetabled at just over 30 minutes - which is basically the same journey time as the Central line from West Ruislip to Lancaster Gate (which is just around the corner from Paddington), which takes 32 minutes. However it is true that the return Chiltern working from Paddington to West Ruislip takes only 20 minutes. All in all I don't really consider the lack of ability to use Oyster PAYG between West Ruislip and Paddington this saturday a major hardship - and it is a situation that will be resolved in the near future when the new gates go in at Paddington that will enable PAYG to be accepted on this and other routes. Let's say however that this saturday a passenger using Oyster PAYG gets on a Chiltern train at West Ruislip anyway. First off they may well have to contend with the guard (bearing in mind that Oyster PAYG is not valid on this route, AFAICS anyway) - but let's say the guard lets them off. Once they arrive at Paddington they'll need to (or at least want to) touch-out - and it can be done... At the moment passengers can reach the Hammersmith and City line platforms without passing through a gate, and on those platforms are a couple of standalone Oyster readers. The way to get there without passing through a gate is to get onto platforms 13/14 (it's likely that the Chiltern train will arrive on one of these platforms anyway) then go up the stairs onto the overbridge and then down onto the H&C line platforms - voila, you can touch-out, and you won't get an unresolved journey. I would hope that there would be some information at West Ruislip that explicitly makes this all clear - as I remember it, the existing poster is merely concerned with the single daily weekday service to Paddington. However, unfortunately I would't be in the least bit surprised to find that there wasn't any such specific info at West Ruislip regarding saturday's altered services. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 25 Jan, 15:16, Mizter T wrote:
At the moment passengers can reach the Hammersmith and City line platforms without passing through a gate, and on those platforms are a couple of standalone Oyster readers. Why'd you use the validators? Being touched-in and on the platforms is a consistent situation already, so you can either go out the gates like an H&C passenger or continue your tube journey. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
In message
of Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:47:27 in uk.transport.london, Andy writes This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. I think authority to travel for a given service should be valid on a replacement. I think it is otherwise not a replacement. A few weeks ago, I went on an advertised replacement service to Amersham via Beaconsfield from Marylebone while there was no Metropolitan service north of Harrow-on-the-Hill. I touched in and out at both ends of the journey to avoid grief. I spoke to a CSA at Amersham and was told I was within my rights. At 22.00 on a Saturday night, I thought I was unlikely to meet a Revenue Protection Inspector. I don't know the details, but believe TfL has the ability to suspend the need to touch out. I would not be surprised to find the system does not work smoothly. That reminds me, I must chase a charging mistake. On Sunday, I reached my cap. At Earls Court, I asked a question of a CSA at the Manual Gate and touched in as I followed him to some information. The system made a different notation of the event and started a new cap accumulation. By the time I realised there was a problem, it was too late to get ticket office staff to resolve the issue. Unfortunately, there is insufficient detail on the website journey history to explain. -- Walter Briscoe |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 25, 3:16*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On 25 Jan, 11:47, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. I did think about this issue when I noticed the exact same scenario a few weekends ago. To be honest I very much doubt that there is any provision for Oyster PAYG on these journeys, as I'm pretty sure Oyster PAYG just isn't valid for that route - even when trains are diverted because of planned engineering works. (Besides, I have never come across any type of temporary, portable Oyster reader that could be used for this purpose.) I'd simply suggest that Oyster PAYG is not valid on these services. Whether Chiltern Railways posters will specifically state this information I cannot say - their website's section on planned changes to services certainly doesn't mention Oyster PAYG at all. Yes, but the normal procedure for engineering work is that normal tickets are valid via the diversionary route, even if they normally wouldn't be. So why should a PAYG user have to pay more (say they are using the oyster cap) just because they are Central line phobic. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 25 Jan, 15:26, Mr Thant
wrote: On 25 Jan, 15:16, Mizter T wrote: At the moment passengers can reach the Hammersmith and City line platforms without passing through a gate, and on those platforms are a couple of standalone Oyster readers. Why'd you use the validators? Being touched-in and on the platforms is a consistent situation already, so you can either go out the gates like an H&C passenger or continue your tube journey. U Of course, of course, good point - if the passenger wanted to touch- out, they could do so by simply exiting the gates that exist on the footbridge. However I would argue that if a passenger was continuing their journey on the H&C line a passenger in this situation might want to touch-in anyway - if they were checked then the RPI might legitimately ask how a passenger who entered this system at West Ruislip came to be on the H&C platforms at Paddington without having passed through any other set of gates (and at least some of the handheld Oyster readers used by RPIs will provide this more detailed information). Plus swiping your Oyster mid-journey is not something that causes problems in terms of the overall journey, at least not in my experience. Of course this is all a slightly murky discussion given the fact that Oyster PAYG is not valid on Chiltern from West Ruislip to Paddington. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 25 Jan, 16:26, Andy wrote:
On Jan 25, 3:16 pm, Mizter T wrote: On 25 Jan, 11:47, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. I did think about this issue when I noticed the exact same scenario a few weekends ago. To be honest I very much doubt that there is any provision for Oyster PAYG on these journeys, as I'm pretty sure Oyster PAYG just isn't valid for that route - even when trains are diverted because of planned engineering works. (Besides, I have never come across any type of temporary, portable Oyster reader that could be used for this purpose.) I'd simply suggest that Oyster PAYG is not valid on these services. Whether Chiltern Railways posters will specifically state this information I cannot say - their website's section on planned changes to services certainly doesn't mention Oyster PAYG at all. Yes, but the normal procedure for engineering work is that normal tickets are valid via the diversionary route, even if they normally wouldn't be. So why should a PAYG user have to pay more (say they are using the oyster cap) just because they are Central line phobic. Interesting point. I guess one way to explain it would be to say that Oyster PAYG doesn't count as a "normal ticket" in the conventional sense. I don't know what the specific rules are with regards to ticket acceptance on diversionary services, so I couldn't say if Chiltern were falling foul of them - I can quite imagine that in the whole, when all the relevant rules are considered, the situation might not be at all clear cut. Even on the Underground, when there are engineering works issues there are issues about Oyster PAYG - for example when LU tickets are advertised as being valid on local buses (i.e. not specific replacement buses) when part of an LU line is not working, Oyster PAYG users would still end up paying for the bus fare. Thankfully this specific issue of Oyster PAYG and Chiltern running into Paddington will be resolved shortly when the new gates go in at Paddington. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
Walter Briscoe wrote: In message of Fri, 25 Jan 2008 03:47:27 in uk.transport.london, Andy writes This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. I think authority to travel for a given service should be valid on a replacement. I think it is otherwise not a replacement. A few weeks ago, I went on an advertised replacement service to Amersham via Beaconsfield from Marylebone while there was no Metropolitan service north of Harrow-on-the-Hill. I touched in and out at both ends of the journey to avoid grief. I spoke to a CSA at Amersham and was told I was within my rights. At 22.00 on a Saturday night, I thought I was unlikely to meet a Revenue Protection Inspector. If it was advertised as a replacement service by LU, that all sounds legit. Whether staff at Amersham had been briefed that this might happen is another question! I don't know the details, but believe TfL has the ability to suspend the need to touch out. I would not be surprised to find the system does not work smoothly. When the Chelsea Flower Show is on, I understand that a side door to Sloane Square Underground station is opened specifically for Flower Show bound punters - there is no gate and no facility for passengers to touch-out. However what then happens is that these same passengers are presumed to make a return journey by Underground, and so will pass through the gates of Sloane Square to enter the station - when they so do, everything get resolved properly. However if they do not, they incur the £4 maximum fare. This implementation attracted some negative comment last year - people obviously got refunded if they complained, but of course that's a pain nonetheless - so it might be done differently this year. We shall see. Separately, I've encountered a journey being "auto-completed" once. On New Year's Eve 2006/07 I was making a rather inadvisable late hop between parties with a friend (who was using a Travelcard). I touched- in as normal through the gates, but on exit at Camden Town at 23.40 (i.e. 5 minutes before NYE free travel officially begins) the gates were already open and what's more were completely turned off (Oyster pads and all). Whatever, I was in a rush! The next day I returned from Camden Town, and *before* going through the gates I checked my journey history on a ticket machine - my journey was shown as being "Bank - Auto-completed" (Bank is an example start point of course... or maybe I was partying with the Old Lady of Threadneedle Street, it's all a bit hazy). So there was some configuration change which meant I didn't get charged the max fare on entry (which is normal, as it is then adjusted later) - perhaps the whole system was changed from say 21.45 on the 31st so as to only charge people the minimum fare. I intended to keep a permanent record of this journey history entry, but alas I didn't. Anyway with regards to the specific situation - what you seem to be proposing is that for the duration of the engineering works the max fare charging element is turned off at West Ruislip, however that would mean that passengers entering or exiting West Ruislip were only charged the minimum fare from that station, which is £1 at any time. Or the more sophisticated alternative is that the max fare on entry debited at West Ruislip was adjusted to be that of a zone 1-5 journey (£2, or £3.50 weekdays between 7am-7pm), and that any unresolved journey to/from West Ruislip was also included in the daily capping that day - with the presumption that any journey to/from West Ruislip that was unresolved (i.e. only an entry or exit) was a journey to or from Paddington/zone 1. I don't know how difficulty it would be to make the latter changes, or even if it was possible, but if it was then I'm pretty sure it would cover the situation that will arise when Chiltern trains divert to/ from Paddington. That reminds me, I must chase a charging mistake. On Sunday, I reached my cap. At Earls Court, I asked a question of a CSA at the Manual Gate and touched in as I followed him to some information. The system made a different notation of the event and started a new cap accumulation. By the time I realised there was a problem, it was too late to get ticket office staff to resolve the issue. Unfortunately, there is insufficient detail on the website journey history to explain. -- Walter Briscoe That sounds a bit peculiar, however it might be as a result of the fact that system does not know whether you were coming or going - touching on an Oyster pad, unlike touching on a gate, doesn't provides any indication as to whether you were entering or exiting the system. Where had you been earlier - I'm not looking for an account of all your movements (!), just some basics - i.e. Had you exited Earls Court earlier on? If so how much earlier? If not had you exited another station earlier on? My experience thus far has indicated that the Oyster system is fairly robust, and can cope with unusual events, so I'm interested in what comes of this.. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
That reminds me, I must chase a charging mistake. On Sunday, I reached
my cap. At Earls Court, I asked a question of a CSA at the Manual Gate and touched in as I followed him to some information. The system made a different notation of the event and started a new cap accumulation. By the time I realised there was a problem, it was too late to get ticket office staff to resolve the issue. Unfortunately, there is insufficient detail on the website journey history to explain. I get a similar thing nearly everytime I use Oyster. I touch in, and touch out. It doesn't recognise me touching out, and then my next nourney in the day is counted as two journeys, both starting at the very first station that I touched in. For example, if I go Canada Water to Picadilly Circus, then Picadilly Circus to West Hampstead, Oyster displays: Canada Water -- Picadilly Circus Canada Water -- West Hampstead Oh so very annoying. LEWIS |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote:
This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Last Saturday I took the train from West Hampstead thameslink to St Pancras. Usually PAYG is valid on this route, but because of engineering work the train ran into the high level platforms at St P, where there were no gates and no obvious place to touch out, so I got charged the max cash fare and had to ring the oyster helpline to get it refunded. I don't know what else I could/should have done. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 26, 9:04*am, brixtonite wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Last Saturday I took the train from West Hampstead thameslink to St Pancras. *Usually PAYG is valid on this route, but because of engineering work the train ran into the high level platforms at St P, where there were no gates and no obvious place to touch out, so I got charged the max cash fare and had to ring the oyster helpline to get it refunded. *I don't know what else I could/should have done. Did you see if the level platform gates still manned? If so, you could have asked to touch out there. If there are no validators at St. Pancras high level then you should write to (or email) FCC to ask about what they are going to do about it. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 26 Jan, 09:04, brixtonite wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Last Saturday I took the train from West Hampstead thameslink to St Pancras. Usually PAYG is valid on this route, but because of engineering work the train ran into the high level platforms at St P, where there were no gates and no obvious place to touch out, so I got charged the max cash fare and had to ring the oyster helpline to get it refunded. I don't know what else I could/should have done. Interesting. I was aware of Thameslink engineering work that meant trains were diverted into St. Pancras high-level, but my cursory glance at the website suggested that it was only the Bedford "expresses", which are first stop St Albans, which wouldn't have been an issue with regards to Oyster Pay-as-you-go. I was evidently wrong. I understand there are going to be many weekend blockades of the central Thameslink route through central London for works associated with the Thameslink Programme (aka Thameslink 2000) - I'm guessing that this will mean that the situation you encountered, with trains being diverted into St. Pancras high-level, will happen lots more in the future. It looks like FCC and TfL need to sort out a solution for this. One or two Oyster readers on the high-level platforms at St. Pancras would suffice. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 25, 11:47*am, Andy wrote:
This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Well, having gone for a ride today. No sign of any posters about PAYG being valid or not on the Paddington trains, but the guard just glanced at my Oyster and said OK (although I do have a Zone 1-5 travelcard on it and so the PAYG couldn't really be checked). Touching out at West Ruislip bought up an 'Entry' on the validator and I'll have to see what the records say has been charged in a day or two. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
In message
of Fri, 25 Jan 2008 14:29:54 in uk.transport.london, Mizter T writes Walter Briscoe wrote: [snip] That reminds me, I must chase a charging mistake. On Sunday, I reached my cap. At Earls Court, I asked a question of a CSA at the Manual Gate and touched in as I followed him to some information. The system made a different notation of the event and started a new cap accumulation. By the time I realised there was a problem, it was too late to get ticket office staff to resolve the issue. Unfortunately, there is insufficient detail on the website journey history to explain. -- Walter Briscoe That sounds a bit peculiar, however it might be as a result of the fact that system does not know whether you were coming or going - touching on an Oyster pad, unlike touching on a gate, doesn't provides any indication as to whether you were entering or exiting the system. Where had you been earlier - I'm not looking for an account of all your movements (!), just some basics - i.e. Had you exited Earls Court earlier on? If so how much earlier? If not had you exited another station earlier on? My experience thus far has indicated that the Oyster system is fairly robust, and can cope with unusual events, so I'm interested in what comes of this.. Zone 1 entry; 3 times (Zone 1 or 2 exit + entry); Zone 1 exit (capped) + entry; twice (Zone 1 exit + entry); Zone 1 exit (uncapped); Bus; Zone 1 entry; St James's Park exit (capped) [ticket office unable to assist], etc. It is easy not to note the display. Many don't work and LU seems to have no procedure for regularly testing them. It ought to be a SMOP (Small Matter of Programming) to use sound to distinguish charging events. It seems obsessive to check Oyster history on a POM (Passenger Operated Machine) after each station. At least unsighted Londoners get free travel and my admiration for using the system. The 4.00 cash fare shows tourists are viewed as fair - should that be fare? - game. I have written to to ask for an explanation and a refund. I find their phone service takes forever and it lacks a record. I WAS very happy with Oyster PAYG. I am now less so. In particular, I HATE the way it QUIETLY charges a maximum fare or two. Ticket office presentation is good but the 8 journey limit does not meet my need. I think the Journey history at https://oyster.tfl.gov.uk/oyster/ppvStatement.do is unfit for purpose: debits and credits are only distinguished by the affect on the balance; unfinished and unstarted journeys are not identified; etc. -- Walter Briscoe |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On 26 Jan, 18:22, Andy wrote:
On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Well, having gone for a ride today. No sign of any posters about PAYG being valid or not on the Paddington trains, but the guard just glanced at my Oyster and said OK (although I do have a Zone 1-5 travelcard on it and so the PAYG couldn't really be checked). Touching out at West Ruislip bought up an 'Entry' on the validator and I'll have to see what the records say has been charged in a day or two. As West Ruislip is in zone 6, outside the validity of your z1-5 Travelcard, I'd think you will have been charged the £4 max fare for an unresolved PAYG journey. |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 27, 11:45*am, Mizter T wrote:
On 26 Jan, 18:22, Andy wrote: On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Well, having gone for a ride today. No sign of any posters about PAYG being valid or not on the Paddington trains, but the guard just glanced at my Oyster and said OK (although I do have a Zone 1-5 travelcard on it and so the PAYG couldn't really be checked). Touching out at West Ruislip bought up an 'Entry' on the validator and I'll have to see what the records say has been charged in a day or two. As West Ruislip is in zone 6, outside the validity of your z1-5 Travelcard, I'd think you will have been charged the £4 max fare for an unresolved PAYG journey. I don't think so, as the system (in other locations) assumes that I've entered in Zones 1-5 and charges the correct fare. I've checked on my records (updated overnight) and I think that the correct fare was deducted (£1.00). I've got £1.00 (Entry) deducted at West Ruislip and then £1.00 (Entry) deducted at Ickenham where I took the Met line back to Harrow. These look like the correct fares, although I've got to check capping levels!! I've had the problem with validators saying the opposite to what I've done before, but the correct fare being applied. It is down to an entry within the zones not actually being recorded on the card, only the exit outside the zones and at West Ruislip I used the validators on the exit from the Chiltern platforms, not the ticket barriers in the Central line bit of the station. Unresolved PAYG penalties seem to be different if you have a season on the ticket as well, I think that they are £1 regardless of the route (not sure about National Rail) |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
Andy wrote: On Jan 27, 11:45�am, Mizter T wrote: On 26 Jan, 18:22, Andy wrote: On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Well, having gone for a ride today. No sign of any posters about PAYG being valid or not on the Paddington trains, but the guard just glanced at my Oyster and said OK (although I do have a Zone 1-5 travelcard on it and so the PAYG couldn't really be checked). Touching out at West Ruislip bought up an 'Entry' on the validator and I'll have to see what the records say has been charged in a day or two. As West Ruislip is in zone 6, outside the validity of your z1-5 Travelcard, I'd think you will have been charged the £4 max fare for an unresolved PAYG journey. I don't think so, as the system (in other locations) assumes that I've entered in Zones 1-5 and charges the correct fare. I've checked on my records (updated overnight) and I think that the correct fare was deducted (£1.00). I've got £1.00 (Entry) deducted at West Ruislip and then £1.00 (Entry) deducted at Ickenham where I took the Met line back to Harrow. These look like the correct fares, although I've got to check capping levels!! That is interesting. I would have thought that the always touch-in/out or be charged a max cash fare for an unresolved journey rule would always apply when you are using PAYG - and you were indeed using PAYG, in combination with your Travelcard, for that journey. However I have two possible explanations for this. The first is that, as I postulate elsewhere, the validators at West Ruislip were specifically reprogrammed so as to give passengers the benefit of the doubt yesterday - i.e. the max cash fare was not charged for unresolved journeys that started or ended at West Ruislip - and this change was made specifically to make an allowance for the fact that Chiltern's services were running in and out of Paddington instead of Marylebone. (If this was the case then any PAYG journey ending at West Ruislip yesterday where the Oyster card had not been touched-in would have been charged the £1 'minimum fare'. Perhaps if Chiltern do this again soon before the Paddington gates get installed I'll try this using Oyster PAYG - note that if I did this I would of course have another, valid ticket such as a Day Travelcard.) The second explanation is this - you had used London Underground earlier that day and had exited the network, say at Paddington. When you got to West Ruislip the system simply extended your journey from the last location where you had validated your Oyster card, and made the presumption that you were extending your journey out to West Ruislip. I understand that in this might not make a lot of logical sense, in that when one exits the LU network through some gates AIUI this is clearly recorded as an exit - but perhaps there is a level of tolerance built in to the system. I've had the problem with validators saying the opposite to what I've done before, but the correct fare being applied. It is down to an entry within the zones not actually being recorded on the card, [...] That's not right. When using a Travelcard on Oyster, entry and exit points are not shown on the online Oyster journey history (I suppose this is regarded as clutter, as users of the online journey history want to see details of chargeable journeys) - however they are recorded on the card, and this can be seen if you look at your journey history on a Tube ticket machine. Entry and exit points are always recorded on an Oyster card when it is used to pass through PAYG enabled gates (i.e. the whole LU network, plus some other gates at stations served by mainline trains where PAYG is valid, e.g. Liverpool Street, Euston or stations on the London Overground network such as Dalston Kingsland). However entry and exit points are not recorded when an Oyster card with valid Travelcard is used to pass through gates that are *not* PAYG enabled - for example, at Victoria, London Bridge, Earlsfield or East Croydon. In these cases the gates simply check for a valid Travelcard loaded on the Oyster card, and do not electronically 'mark' the card with an entry/exit point. [...] only the exit outside the zones and at West Ruislip I used the validators on the exit from the Chiltern platforms, not the ticket barriers in the Central line bit of the station. Unresolved PAYG penalties seem to be different if you have a season on the ticket as well, I think that they are £1 regardless of the route (not sure about National Rail) As I explain above I'm not sure about whether those with Travelcard seasons really are normally treated any differently to those using 'pure' PAYG when it comes to extending their journey through the use of PAYG, but I certainly take full note of your experience. I will have to investigate. I think that using the standalone validators or Oyster readers as opposed to entering or exiting from the gates could potentially lead to different results, as unlike gates standalone Oyster readers cannot determine for certain whether someone is starting or finishing a journey, or indeed merely touching-in midway through one (when, say, they change lines or trains). This perhaps would explain why the Oyster reader you used displayed "Entry". |
Oyster PAYG and weekend engineering work
On Jan 27, 2:51Â*pm, Mizter T wrote:
Andy wrote: On Jan 27, 11:45�am, Mizter T wrote: On 26 Jan, 18:22, Andy wrote: On Jan 25, 11:47 am, Andy wrote: This Saturday there is engineering work which means the the West Ruislip - Marylebone services are diverted to Paddington. Currently Oyster PAYG is valid on the Marylebone route, but not into Paddington (this being on the list for spring 2008). Does anyone know if provision has made for people touching in at West Ruislip and then not being able to touch out at Paddington during the diversion? Will the be posters saying that PAYG is not available or will people have to phone up about unresolved journeys. Well, having gone for a ride today. No sign of any posters about PAYG being valid or not on the Paddington trains, but the guard just glanced at my Oyster and said OK (although I do have a Zone 1-5 travelcard on it and so the PAYG couldn't really be checked). Touching out at West Ruislip bought up an 'Entry' on the validator and I'll have to see what the records say has been charged in a day or two. As West Ruislip is in zone 6, outside the validity of your z1-5 Travelcard, I'd think you will have been charged the £4 max fare for an unresolved PAYG journey. I don't think so, as the system (in other locations) assumes that I've entered in Zones 1-5 and charges the correct fare. I've checked on my records (updated overnight) and I think that the correct fare was deducted (£1.00). I've got £1.00 (Entry) deducted at West Ruislip and then £1.00 (Entry) deducted at Ickenham where I took the Met line back to Harrow. These look like the correct fares, although I've got to check capping levels!! That is interesting. I would have thought that the always touch-in/out or be charged a max cash fare for an unresolved journey rule would always apply when you are using PAYG - and you were indeed using PAYG, in combination with your Travelcard, for that journey. However I have two possible explanations for this. The first is that, as I postulate elsewhere, the validators at West Ruislip were specifically reprogrammed so as to give passengers the benefit of the doubt yesterday - i.e. the max cash fare was not charged for unresolved journeys that started or ended at West Ruislip - and this change was made specifically to make an allowance for the fact that Chiltern's services were running in and out of Paddington instead of Marylebone. My experience at West Ruislip is no different to when I touch in if going travelling from Watford Met (or Watford Junction). I always get £1 deducted upon entry and an exit when I leave the system outside the zones of my travelcard (during the week I might get an extra deduction on exit depending on the journey). This has always appears to be the case when travelling into the zones of a travelcard. Travelling out, I have never seen the entry point on the journey history, just £1 (or whatever) deducted on exit. (If this was the case then any PAYG journey ending at West Ruislip yesterday where the Oyster card had not been touched-in would have been charged the £1 'minimum fare'. Perhaps if Chiltern do this again soon before the Paddington gates get installed I'll try this using Oyster PAYG - note that if I did this I would of course have another, valid ticket such as a Day Travelcard.) The second explanation is this - you had used London Underground earlier that day and had exited the network, say at Paddington. When you got to West Ruislip the system simply extended your journey from the last location where you had validated your Oyster card, and made the presumption that you were extending your journey out to West Ruislip. I understand that in this might not make a lot of logical sense, in that when one exits the LU network through some gates AIUI this is clearly recorded as an exit - but perhaps there is a level of tolerance built in to the system. I too wondered if this was the case, but in that case I would have expect the gates to flash up 'exit' I've had the problem with validators saying the opposite to what I've done before, but the correct fare being applied. It is down to an entry within the zones not actually being recorded on the card, [...] That's not right. When using a Travelcard on Oyster, entry and exit points are not shown on the online Oyster journey history (I suppose this is regarded as clutter, as users of the online journey history want to see details of chargeable journeys) - however they are recorded on the card, and this can be seen if you look at your journey history on a Tube ticket machine. Entry and exit points are always recorded on an Oyster card when it is used to pass through PAYG enabled gates (i.e. the whole LU network, plus some other gates at stations served by mainline trains where PAYG is valid, e.g. Liverpool Street, Euston or stations on the London Overground network such as Dalston Kingsland). I've never used the journey history at a ticket office, but it is a shame that the detailed information isn't available online as well (maybe as an option). It also doesn't appear to be visible to the Oyster helpline as I've been questioned about why I havn't touched in before when I have done so. The explanation that I have a travelcard on the Oyster has always been accepted. However entry and exit points are not recorded when an Oyster card with valid Travelcard is used to pass through gates that are *not* PAYG enabled - for example, at Victoria, London Bridge, Earlsfield or East Croydon. In these cases the gates simply check for a valid Travelcard loaded on the Oyster card, and do not electronically 'mark' the card with an entry/exit point. [...] only the exit outside the zones and at West Ruislip I used the validators on the exit from the Chiltern platforms, not the ticket barriers in the Central line bit of the station. Unresolved PAYG penalties seem to be different if you have a season on the ticket as well, I think that they are £1 regardless of the route (not sure about National Rail) As I explain above I'm not sure about whether those with Travelcard seasons really are normally treated any differently to those using 'pure' PAYG when it comes to extending their journey through the use of PAYG, but I certainly take full note of your experience. I will have to investigate. See above I think that using the standalone validators or Oyster readers as opposed to entering or exiting from the gates could potentially lead to different results, as unlike gates standalone Oyster readers cannot determine for certain whether someone is starting or finishing a journey, or indeed merely touching-in midway through one (when, say, they change lines or trains). This perhaps would explain why the Oyster reader you used displayed "Entry". |
All times are GMT. The time now is 11:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk