![]() |
Stop Markers on LU
Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same
number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style stop markers or are LU train operators required to "judge" their stopping point appropriate to their train length. -- gordon |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 10, 3:13*pm, " wrote:
Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style stop markers or are LU train operators required to "judge" their stopping point appropriate to their train length. Yes, quite a few. There are markers, but they are attached to the sleepers rather than at driver height. Some examples I can think of: The section shared by the Hammermith/Circle C stock (six cars) and the Metropolitan A stock (eight cars). The Wimbledon branch, shared by D stock (six longer cars) and C stock (from Edgware Road). Between Ealing Common and Barons Court the District trains are longer than the Piccadilly. Between Rayners Lane and Uxbridge, the Metropolitan trains are longer than the Piccadilly. At Finchley Road and Wembley Park, the Metropolitan trains are longer than the Jubilee. On the south side of the Circle, the District trains are longer than the Circle. In many outside sections, the platforms happen to be longer than the trains anyway, and markers are needed so that they stay at the entrance end. Thinking about it, this may be the case for nearly all outside stations. |
Stop Markers on LU
In message
of Sun, 10 Feb 2008 07:13:31 in uk.transport.london, " writes Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style Yes! Metropolitan (8) shares with Circle and Hammersmith & City (6) and also with Piccadilly (6). Bakerloo (7) shares with Overground (?). stop markers or are LU train operators required to "judge" their stopping point appropriate to their train length. -- Walter Briscoe |
Stop Markers on LU
Yes! Metropolitan (8) shares with Circle and Hammersmith & City (6) and also with Piccadilly (6). Bakerloo (7) shares with Overground (?). ... (3)...! Best Wishes, LEWIS |
Stop Markers on LU
On 10 Feb, 15:26, MIG wrote:
In many outside sections, the platforms happen to be longer than the trains anyway, and markers are needed so that they stay at the entrance end. * I think all of the lines mentioned rely on platform-mounted monitors and mirrors for checking the doors (save Overground, which has guards), and the train also needs to be lined up with the Correct Side Door Enable transmitter, so the driver doesn't have a lot of choice in where they stop. U -- http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/ A blog about transport projects in London |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 10, 3:58*pm, "Lew 1"
wrote: Yes! Metropolitan (8) shares with Circle and Hammersmith & City (6) and also with Piccadilly (6). Bakerloo (7) shares with Overground (?). .. (3)...! Trouble is numbers don't help much, because of the different car lengths. If there's a standardish length of about 16 m (eg Circle, Central, Bakerloo, Metropolitan etc), the Jubilee, Northern and Piccadilly are a bit longer (about 17½ m), and the District D stock are longer still (over 18 m), such that six D stock cars are about the length of seven standardish cars. The "Overground" cars are about 20 m, so three of them are the length of four Bakerloos. Another location I forgot is Mile End where District (6 long, ie the same as 7 standardish) use different tracks but same island platforms as Central (8 standardish). |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 10, 4:22*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 10 Feb, 15:26, MIG wrote: In many outside sections, the platforms happen to be longer than the trains anyway, and markers are needed so that they stay at the entrance end. * I think all of the lines mentioned rely on platform-mounted monitors and mirrors for checking the doors (save Overground, which has guards), and the train also needs to be lined up with the Correct Side Door Enable transmitter, so the driver doesn't have a lot of choice in where they stop. True, although the markers go back much further. I can't remember that sort of detail before the 1970s unfortunately, but the sleeper markers were well established then. I wonder if someone has early pictures? |
Stop Markers on LU
"Mr Thant" wrote in message ... I think all of the lines mentioned rely on platform-mounted monitors and mirrors for checking the doors (save Overground, which has guards), and the train also needs to be lined up with the Correct Side Door Enable transmitter, so the driver doesn't have a lot of choice in where they stop. I thought that the Door Enable Transmitter was exclusive to the Jubilee Line, because it let the driver know that he is properly lined up with the doors. Other llines only had markers letting drivers know that they had properly berthed. BTW, isn't the diamond on the platform the spot that allows optimal viewing of the mirrors? |
Stop Markers on LU
wrote in message ... Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style stop markers or are LU train operators required to "judge" their stopping point appropriate to their train length. -- gordon Richmond/Gunnersbury is shared by District and 3-car 313s(?) (ex National Rail now London Overground). Do those stations have both NR and LT markers? Are they going to change the markers on the rest of Overground? |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 10, 3:13 pm, " wrote:
Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style stop markers or are LU train operators required to "judge" their stopping point appropriate to their train length. -- gordon Usually! - On lines with CSDE (Correct Side Door Enable) fitted, like the District, Picc,Met, C&H etc there are stopping diamonds in the 4 foot. Where stocks of varying length are operated and they stop in different places, like Kings Cross St. Pancras WB then there are numbers (length of train) or letters (stock). Unlike on NR many stations only have one set of OPO equipment per platform so sometimes the rear of the train would be far from the platform entrance, whereas on NR there would be a stopping mark for shorter trains. An example is Southfields EB; the last car of a D Stock train is at the bottom of the stairs, but the last car of a C Stock is further along the platform! On the Northern and Jubilee they use a a system called Acurate Stop (or something like that- it's a newer version of CSDE). The aim is to stop in the green bar within yellow and black stripes, which is at head height on the platform or tunnel wall. |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 10, 8:22 am, Mr Thant
wrote: On 10 Feb, 15:26, MIG wrote: In many outside sections, the platforms happen to be longer than the trains anyway, and markers are needed so that they stay at the entrance end. I think all of the lines mentioned rely on platform-mounted monitors and mirrors for checking the doors (save Overground, which has guards), and the train also needs to be lined up with the Correct Side Door Enable transmitter, so the driver doesn't have a lot of choice in where they stop. At Moorgate (Circle/H+C/Met), which I use daily, there are two separate sets of monitors/mirrors for westbound trains (one for the longer Met trains and one for the rest). PaulO |
Stop Markers on LU
Walter Briscoe (Walter Briscoe ) gurgled
happily, sounding much like they were saying: Do LU have any platforms shared by trains which do not have the same number of cars in a set? Do such platforms have BR/Network Rail-style Yes! Metropolitan (8) shares with Circle and Hammersmith & City (6) and also with Piccadilly (6). Bakerloo (7) shares with Overground (?). Met also shares platforms with Chiltern diesels (2-6) |
Stop Markers on LU
"Graham Harrison" wrote in
message ... Richmond/Gunnersbury is shared by District and 3-car 313s(?) (ex National Rail now London Overground). Do those stations have both NR and LT markers? Are they going to change the markers on the rest of Overground? I believe that the stop markers between Gunnersbury and Richmond are the same for both Overground and Underground. |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 11, 10:09*pm, wrote:
"Graham Harrison" wrote in ... Richmond/Gunnersbury is shared by District and 3-car 313s(?) (ex National Rail now London Overground). * Do those stations have both NR and LT markers? * Are they going to change the markers on the rest of Overground? I believe that the stop markers between Gunnersbury and Richmond are the same for both Overground and Underground. I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. |
Stop Markers on LU
"MIG" wrote in message ... I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? |
Stop Markers on LU
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:55:03 GMT, wrote:
I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). I don't think there are any stopping marks for the Underground. |
Stop Markers on LU
"asdf" wrote in message ... On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:55:03 GMT, wrote: I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), I thought the "S car stop" was what they used for both on the District, though I could be wrong. though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). Why would it not be possible? Slightly changing the subject, LT drivers also have to know how to read national rail signals as well, don't they? |
Stop Markers on LU
Slightly changing the subject, LT drivers also have to know how to read national rail signals as well, don't they? Yes. On the Bakerloo and District lines. Control staff on the District, Piccadilly, Metropolitan and Circle lines also need to know too. |
Stop Markers on LU
Why on the Piccadilly as it does not come into contact with National Rail
trains? "chunky munky" wrote in message ... Slightly changing the subject, LT drivers alsomo have to know how to read national rail signals as well, don't they? Yes. On the Bakerloo and District lines. Control staff on the District, Piccadilly, Metropolitan and Circle lines also need to know too. |
Stop Markers on LU
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:04:19 GMT, wrote:
I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), I thought the "S car stop" was what they used for both on the District, though I could be wrong. though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). Why would it not be possible? The power supply may not be able to cope with the current drawn by a 6-car 313 accelerating. |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 13, 11:12 pm, wrote:
Why on the Piccadilly as it does not come into contact with National Rail trains? "chunky munky" wrote in message ... Slightly changing the subject, LT drivers alsomo have to know how to read national rail signals as well, don't they? Yes. On the Bakerloo and District lines. Control staff on the District, Piccadilly, Metropolitan and Circle lines also need to know too. I should have mentioned that the signal operators west of Tower Hill are Piccadilly line ones. |
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 13, 11:56*pm, asdf wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:04:19 GMT, wrote: I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), I thought the "S car stop" was what they used for both on the District, though I could be wrong. though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). Why would it not be possible? The power supply may not be able to cope with the current drawn by a 6-car 313 accelerating. In the past, there have been 6-car 313s on the Euston - Watford DC lines. I can certainly recall them being used at weekends when there were blockades on the WCML, although not recently. |
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
On Thu, 14 Feb 2008 20:40 +0000 (GMT Standard Time), Colin Rosenstiel
wrote: I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), I thought the "S car stop" was what they used for both on the District, though I could be wrong. though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). Why would it not be possible? The power supply may not be able to cope with the current drawn by a 6-car 313 accelerating. How do they cope with 6-car 313 trains on the GN then? The power supply on the GN can cope with them. The power supply on the DC lines can't (according to a recent thread). |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 14, 11:48*pm, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article , (Andy) wrote: On Feb 13, 11:56*pm, asdf wrote: On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 00:04:19 GMT, wrote: I can't remember what kind is at Gunnersbury etc, but on the Bakerloo shared sections, I think the markers are NR style. For both the Underground and Overground, right? The Overground has "3 car stop" and "6 car stop" signs (or "S car stop" at some stations instead), I thought the "S car stop" was what they used for both on the District, though I could be wrong. though 6 car trains never run (and it may not even be possible). Why would it not be possible? The power supply may not be able to cope with the current drawn by a 6-car 313 accelerating. In the past, there have been 6-car 313s on the Euston - Watford DC lines. I can certainly recall them being used at weekends when there were blockades on the WCML, although not recently. As I said, there are plenty of 6-car 313 trains on the line they were delivered for, the GN. Ahh, but the electrification of the GN line was designed for 6-car 313 formations. The Euston DC lines electrification was designed for the mix of Bakerloo and mainline stock. The previous generation of units (Class 313) only had one motor coach with 4 x 185 hp motors (according to my old Combined Volume) whilst the class 313s have two motor coaches with 4 x 110 hp motors (from the same source). So a single 501 had a power rating of 740hp, whilst a single 313 has 880hp. This is nearly 20% more power and 50 % more motors. The potential problem on the DC line wasn't the length of the train, but whether the power supply could deal with the higher current drawn by a 6 car 313 (especially on starting) compared to a 6 car 501 in days gone by. NB, I know that hp is hard to relate directly to the current drawn by the unit, but the comparison still shows the potential problem. |
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
On 15 Feb, 13:59, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
How do they cope with 6-car 313 trains on the GN then? The power supply on the GN can cope with them. The power supply on the DC lines can't (according to a recent thread). But the GN has DC lines from Drayton Park to Moorgate. The trains are limited to 30 MPH (series only) but I thought that was because of the tunnels, not the power supply. It's not that DC is inherently incapable (see: 12-car Desiros on SWT, which draw more than 2x the power of a 6-car 313), it's that the specific actual DC power system, substations, cabling, etc that was installed on the North London Railway in 1916, even with whatever upgrading it's received since, is not capable. The system installed in the GN in the mid-1970s was much more powerful... [see also: electric trains north of Cambridge or between Leeds and Skipton. 25kV AC is perfectly capable of handling TGVs and massive freight trains, but the systems installed in the 1980s can only handle a couple of EMU...] -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 15, 8:09*pm, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote:
In article , (John B) wrote: On 15 Feb, 13:59, (Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: How do they cope with 6-car 313 trains on the GN then? The power supply on the GN can cope with them. The power supply on the DC lines can't (according to a recent thread). But the GN has DC lines from Drayton Park to Moorgate. The trains are limited to 30 MPH (series only) but I thought that was because of the tunnels, not the power supply. It's not that DC is inherently incapable (see: 12-car Desiros on SWT, which draw more than 2x the power of a 6-car 313), it's that the specific actual DC power system, substations, cabling, etc that was installed on the North London Railway in 1916, even with whatever upgrading it's received since, is not capable. The system installed in the GN in the mid-1970s was much more powerful... [see also: electric trains north of Cambridge or between Leeds and Skipton. 25kV AC is perfectly capable of handling TGVs and massive freight trains, but the systems installed in the 1980s can only handle a couple of EMU...] But the power supply North of Queen's Park could handle 1680HP 1938TS. So why not a mere 6 cars of class 313? -- Colin Rosenstiel I think that there might be some mixing of problems here. I think that the North London line is the route limited to 3 car 313s, this was electrified before the DC lines even existed (in 1916). The closure of Broad Street and extension to North Woolwich was done on the cheap and I think this was the part with supply problems. With the closure beyond Stratford and the electrification of the new platforms there with AC, I think that any restriction will disappear, as most of the route will then be AC electrified. The DC Lines from Euston don't have such the restriction, as they were a busier railway, designed to cope with the Bakerloo stock all the way to Watford. However, there may still be a problem of peak current drawn and things may have changed with any re-equiping of the power supply. |
Stop Markers on LU
|
Stop Markers on LU
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 13:59 +0000 (GMT Standard Time),
(Colin Rosenstiel) wrote: And the 1938TS had (IIRC) 2 x 168HP motors per motor car of which there were 5 per train, total 1680HP. I also have a feeling that 501s ran in pairs on occasion. During the peaks, regularly - even the through trains to Croxley Green. -- Bill Hayles http://billnot.com |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 15, 8:42 pm, Andy wrote:
I think that the North London line is the route limited to 3 car 313s Correct. this was electrified before the DC lines even existed (in 1916). The closure of Broad Street and extension to North Woolwich was done on the cheap and I think this was the part with supply problems. I think there are also power limits on the DC between Camden Road and Dalston, but could be wrong. With the closure beyond Stratford and the electrification of the new platforms there with AC, I think that any restriction will disappear, as most of the route will then be AC electrified. Are they planning to make it all-AC between Camden and Dalston as part of the remodelling? Would certainly make sense... The DC Lines from Euston don't have such the restriction, as they were a busier railway, designed to cope with the Bakerloo stock all the way to Watford. Yup. -- John Band john at johnband dot org www.johnband.org |
Stop Markers on LU
On Feb 17, 1:47*pm, John B wrote:
On Feb 15, 8:42 pm, Andy wrote: I think that the North London line is the route limited to 3 car 313s Correct. this was electrified before the DC lines even existed (in 1916). The closure of Broad Street and extension to North Woolwich was done on the cheap and I think this was the part with supply problems. I think there are also power limits on the DC between Camden Road and Dalston, but could be wrong. Yes, there could be too, I don't know if that section was re-equipped when they extended electrification to North Woolwich. With the closure beyond Stratford and the electrification of the new platforms there with AC, I think that any restriction will disappear, as most of the route will then be AC electrified. Are they planning to make it all-AC between Camden and Dalston as part of the remodelling? Would certainly make sense... I think that they have to, as the sections from Canonbury to east of Caledonian Road and Barnsbury will only be two tracks with the remodelling (of course the ELL extension part will be DC only on the other two tracks). There will still need to be AC routes for the freight traffic and to make the section from Dalston to Camden dual electrification would seem a lot of work for little benefit. The DC Lines from Euston don't have such the restriction, as they were a busier railway, designed to cope with the Bakerloo stock all the way to Watford. Yup. -- John Band john at johnband dot orgwww.johnband.org |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk