London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 08, 04:29 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,346
Default Official vandalism at Barbican

On 22 Feb, 15:13, John B wrote:
*Whatever*. Banksy's work /is/ art; if you can't appreciate that
you're a ****wit. Tox06 is a mindless vandal with no artistic merit at
all.


Its art yes, personally I don't think its great art but it has a
certain amount of street cred so the chattering classes can pretend to
be down-wid-da-kids.. Having said that , vandalism is vandalism
however much talent the vandal may have otherwise you might as well
say murder isn't murder if the murderer killed the victim with a
certain amount of panache and creativity. Using that line of thought
probably half of the gestapo qualified as "artists".

B2003

  #12   Report Post  
Old February 22nd 08, 05:08 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jun 2005
Posts: 905
Default Official vandalism at Barbican

On Fri, 22 Feb 2008 07:13:23 -0800 (PST), John B
wrote:

On 22 Feb, 14:31, MIG wrote:
The little ******* were recently active on the westbound FCC platform walls
at Barbican, tagging the brickwork again. Bad in itself - but TPTB have seen
fit to remove the "artwork", not with a high-pressure hose but with a
liberal application of cream paint, which looks equally as bad. Considering
the fine brick retaining walls at the station, it's a shame that the job
couldn't have been done with a little more sympathy. It looks bloody awful!


Wheres John Band to argue that deep down they're just misunderstood
artists wot 'ave a golden 'art an all luv their mums....


*Whatever*. Banksy's work /is/ art; if you can't appreciate that
you're a ****wit.


So anyone who disagrees with your subjective judgement is a ****wit? I
love you too, pal.
  #13   Report Post  
Old February 25th 08, 10:08 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2006
Posts: 942
Default Official vandalism at Barbican

On 22 Feb, 18:08, James Farrar wrote:

*Whatever*. Banksy's work /is/ art; if you can't appreciate that
you're a ****wit.


So anyone who disagrees with your subjective judgement is a ****wit? I
love you too, pal.


No, anyone who knows sufficiently little about aesthetic theory to
understand that under any sane definition that would be used by any
critic, curator or philosopher of art for the last 100 years, Banksy's
work counts as art - but who still also believes they are capable of
making a meaningful contribution to a debate about art, is a ****wit.

That isn't to say Banksy's work is necessarily *good* art, which is
indeed a subjective judgement.

--
John Band
john at johnband dot org
www.johnband.org


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Olympic Games - Official TfL Impact Assessment On Tube Services Paul London Transport 11 December 1st 11 02:07 PM
Official website of Burt Young steffy London Transport 0 March 14th 07 11:26 AM
Official defacement? Clive D. W. Feather London Transport 17 November 23rd 04 12:52 AM
Latest official Crossrail Line Diagram John Rowland London Transport 0 August 4th 04 10:10 AM
Our ways to reduce Vandalism (was: Ways to Reduce Vandalism) Joe Patrick London Transport 0 August 14th 03 10:07 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:33 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017