Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The 'South London Overground' and the Mayoral election
[A long post - so skip to the last paragraph to get to the gist...]
Southern's franchise expires in September 2009, and there has been a degree of speculation with regards to what might happen after that - and this is justified speculation, for it is known that TfL and Mayor Ken have been lobbying the DfT and indeed the Prime Minister for control of the inner suburban (or 'South London Metro') routes, so they can run them as part of the London Overground network. Mr Thant's excellent London Connections blog has been following this issue, and the relevant posts can be read on this page: http://londonconnections.blogspot.com/search?q=southern+takeover In addition, he links to two relevant newspaper stories, one from November last year in The Times... http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle2903879.ece ....and a more recent story from March in the Guardian... http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2...on08.transport There would appear to be some debate over exactly what form TfL's involvement would take, ranging from a full takeover of the South London Metro routes to some other kind of settlement whereby TfL would somehow be involved or have significant influence over the new franchisee. I and many others would warmly welcome TfL's involvement, in whatever form it comes, in running the rail network south of the Thames. Since TfL took over the former Silverlink Metro routes as London Overground back in November things have improved substantially already - stations are now staffed when they are open, many have had new ticket gates installed, stations are being cleaned-up and renovated, trains are far cleaner, tickets checks now actually happen and fare box revenue has gone up significantly. There's much more to come as well, including higher frequency services and new trains. In short, the rail service is now run by an organisation that actually cares about it, under arrangements that mean they can care about it. Granted, Southern might not be in anything quite as decrepit as the state that Silverlink Metro was, but it still sports a plethora of grotty unwelcoming stations, doesn't commit to staffing its stations for the whole time they're open, does very little in terms of checking tickets for those not heading to a central London terminus etc etc. In other words it could be, and indeed should be, so much better. Indeed many recent Southern station improvements have been funded or part- funded by TfL's rail improvement programme, as has some on-train CCTV, so it's not as though Southern would have delivered these goods without TfL's assistance. If TfL were actually in charge, they could do so much more by running it along the lines of the London Overground network north of the river. The Guardian story suggests that the Mayor has in essence won over central government. My question is thus a simple one - if Boris Johnson is elected next week instead of Ken Livingstone, would government ministers be at all keen to go ahead with a plan that allows TfL to takeover - or at least have a substantial role to play in the running of - the South London Metro routes, which would effectively hand him an early victory, one which was basically the result of Ken Livingstone's long-term game plan, or would they just pull the plug on it all? |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Osborne's pre-election goodies for London | London Transport | |||
Weds 16 April - last day to register to vote for Mayoral & GLAelections | London Transport | |||
Mayoral Manifesto from London Travel Watch | London Transport | |||
Rail: the great unmentionable of the general election | London Transport | |||
TfL status depends on election | London Transport |