TfL 2009 fares leaflet
TfL have now published the 2009 fares leaflet.
It's available at tube stations or at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/2930.aspx No real surprises in it. The new mid-day off peak fares are the same as the evening ones. |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On 6 Dec, 22:30, Matthew Dickinson
wrote: No real surprises in it. The new mid-day off peak fares are the same as the evening ones. The differential fares are now called "peak"/"off-peak" rather than "0700-1900"/"all other times", which means a journey made between 1600-1900 is charged at "peak" rates but contributes to your "off peak" cap. The image on the front cover has been updated with the new Tramlink livery (a more palatable version than the real thing, in fact), and the DLR train has been moved further onto the page, but is still the old design. U |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
"Matthew Dickinson" wrote in message ... TfL have now published the 2009 fares leaflet. It's available at tube stations or at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/2930.aspx No real surprises in it. The new mid-day off peak fares are the same as the evening ones. You would hope there wouldn't be any surprises, given the information was published (and discussed here) in September... However I don't recall discussing the morning peak fares starting at 0630 rather than 0700 before. Was that flagged up in advance? Paul S |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
Matthew Dickinson wrote in
: TfL have now published the 2009 fares leaflet. It's available at tube stations or at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/2930.aspx No real surprises in it. The new mid-day off peak fares are the same as the evening ones. The explanation of Oyster includes the paragraph "Your Tube, DLR, London Overground and National Rail pay as you go journey must be completed within two and a half hours of you having touched in at the start of your journey. If the time between touching in and touching out exceeds two and a half hours you will be charged more than the Oyster single fare for your journey. If this happens, you will need to call the Oyster helpline for assistance." I belive this is the first that it has been documented (and is also a change as the current limit is understood to be two hours). David |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 7, 4:04*pm, David Jackman pleasereplytogroup wrote:
Matthew Dickinson wrote : TfL have now published the 2009 fares leaflet. It's available at tube stations or at http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/2930.aspx No real surprises in it. The new mid-day off peak fares are the same as the evening ones. The explanation of Oyster includes the paragraph "Your Tube, DLR, London Overground and National Rail pay as you go journey must be completed within two and a half hours of you having touched in at the start of your journey. If the time between touching in and touching out exceeds two and a half hours you will be charged more than the Oyster single fare for your journey. If this happens, you will need to call the Oyster helpline for assistance." I belive this is the first that it has been documented (and is also a change as the current limit is understood to be two hours). * * * * David It doesn't say whether the timer is reset on touching in at an intermediate point (eg OOS interchange). Presumably it is not, from past threads, but someone might reasonably assuming that touching in is touching in. So if you go to Stratford, do whatever you need to do in half an hour, and then go back home from Stratford, you could end up being charged 2 x £4 instead of 2 x £1.50 (or whatever the new fares are) for the original journey not being completed in 2½ hours and an unresolved touch out when you get home. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On 7 Dec, 16:19, MIG wrote:
So if you go to Stratford, do whatever you need to do in half an hour, and then go back home from Stratford, you could end up being charged 2 x £4 instead of 2 x £1.50 (or whatever the new fares are) for the original journey not being completed in 2½ hours and an unresolved touch out when you get home. Why Stratford? You can't get out of the station without actually touching out. Have you had this problem there? If it was somewhere like Shepherd's Bush and you arrived by Overground, popped into Waitrose (or Morrisson's) and left by Underground, you'd be more likely to run into it. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. As far as I can tell, when you touch back in, it has to decide there and then whether to reopen the previous journey. Recalculating retroactively seems to be beyond the capabilities of the current system. U |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 7, 4:42*pm, Mr Thant
wrote: On 7 Dec, 16:19, MIG wrote: So if you go to Stratford, do whatever you need to do in half an hour, and then go back home from Stratford, you could end up being charged 2 x £4 instead of 2 x £1.50 (or whatever the new fares are) for the original journey not being completed in 2½ hours and an unresolved touch out when you get home. Why Stratford? You can't get out of the station without actually touching out. Have you had this problem there? I was trying to think of somewhere which was reported to have a particularly long timeout. Maybe Shepherds Bush would be a more approriate example. If it was somewhere like Shepherd's Bush and you arrived by Overground, popped into Waitrose (or Morrisson's) and left by Underground, you'd be more likely to run into it. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. As far as I can tell, when you touch back in, it has to decide there and then whether to reopen the previous journey. Recalculating retroactively seems to be beyond the capabilities of the current system. It may be, but I can't understand why, given that recalculating retroactively seems to be what it does all the time, and that all kinds of adjustment can be done manually at the ticket office (and surely anything that the system can do can be automated). There is certainly no moral justification, even if there might just possibly be a practical one. The excuse for the unresolved fares is that you are assumed to have been to an ungated station miles away if you can't prove where you've been*. If all your touches are recorded, that excuse really doesn't wash. *An assumption of guilt not applied to travelcards or other tickets. |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
Mr Thant wrote If it was somewhere like Shepherd's Bush and you arrived by Overground, popped into Waitrose (or Morrisson's) and left by Underground, you'd be more likely to run into it. IIRC the original event was someone picking a shoe repair near Bow Church / Bow Road OSI but Euston / Euston Square seems a likely place too. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. As far as I can tell, when you touch back in, it has to decide there and then whether to reopen the previous journey. Recalculating retroactively seems to be beyond the capabilities of the current system. Does the touch back in have to be at a different barriered zone to counts as an OSI? If so, returning by exactly the same route can't trigger the problem. And what if OOS touch is within the 30 minutes but already over the "2 hours" ? One, very generous, solution would be to start a new "2 hour" period each time you touched in -- Mike D |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
"Michael R N Dolbear" wrote in message news:01c958ac$8ae2ac20$LocalHost@default... Mr Thant wrote If it was somewhere like Shepherd's Bush and you arrived by Overground, popped into Waitrose (or Morrisson's) and left by Underground, you'd be more likely to run into it. IIRC the original event was someone picking a shoe repair near Bow Church / Bow Road OSI but Euston / Euston Square seems a likely place too. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. As far as I can tell, when you touch back in, it has to decide there and then whether to reopen the previous journey. Recalculating retroactively seems to be beyond the capabilities of the current system. Does the touch back in have to be at a different barriered zone to counts as an OSI? If so, returning by exactly the same route can't trigger the problem. And what if OOS touch is within the 30 minutes but already over the "2 hours" ? One, very generous, solution would be to start a new "2 hour" period each time you touched in -- Mike D So just to clarify what hours are now classed as peak? |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 8, 8:12*am, wrote:
"Michael R N Dolbear" wrote in messagenews:01c958ac$8ae2ac20$LocalHost@default... Mr Thant wrote If it was somewhere like Shepherd's Bush and you arrived by Overground, popped into Waitrose (or Morrisson's) and left by Underground, you'd be more likely to run into it. IIRC the original event was someone picking a shoe repair near Bow Church / Bow Road OSI but Euston / Euston Square seems a likely place too. It seems to me that if all the touches are recorded, the system should be able to recalculate the OOS as two journeys. As far as I can tell, when you touch back in, it has to decide there and then whether to reopen the previous journey. Recalculating retroactively seems to be beyond the capabilities of the current system. Does the touch back in have to be at a different barriered zone to counts as an OSI? If so, returning by exactly the same route can't trigger the problem. And what if OOS touch is within the 30 minutes but already over the "2 hours" ? One, very generous, solution would be to start a new "2 hour" period each time you touched in -- Mike D So just to clarify what hours are now classed as peak? For the price of a single journey or for capping? (Reminds me of an episode of South Park where the aliens are confused if you don't use the same word for everything.) |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
wrote in message ... So just to clarify what hours are now classed as peak? http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tickets/faresandtickets/2930.aspx Page 5: Individual Fares "Peak Oyster single fares apply from 0630 to 0930 and from 1600 to 1900 Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays). At all other times, the Off-Peak Oyster single fare applies." Page 7: Capping "The appropriate Peak daily price cap will apply if you travel from 0430 and before 0930 Monday to Friday (excluding public holidays)." "The appropriate Off-Peak daily price cap will apply for all journeys on the same day: Monday to Friday: from 0930 and any journey that starts before 0430 the following day, Saturday, Sunday and public holidays: from 0430 and any journey that starts before 0430 the following day." Seems clear enough, the change from peak to offpeak for capping is 0930,aligned with paper travelcards, and NR outboundary travelcards... Paul |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 7, 4:04 pm, David Jackman pleasereplytogroup wrote:
"Your Tube, DLR, London Overground and National Rail pay as you go journey must be completed within two and a half hours of you having touched in at the start of your journey. If the time between touching in and touching out exceeds two and a half hours you will be charged more than the Oyster single fare for your journey. If this happens, you will need to call the Oyster helpline for assistance." Isn't that nice of them. So for example you're travelling from Amersham to Epping which would probably take not far off 2 hours at the best of times , and theres lots of delays. So as well as being late you get charged more for the privilege. It just beggars belief really. Where the hell do these @rseholes get off screwing passengers about? B2003 |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On 8 Dec, 11:11, wrote:
Isn't that nice of them. So for example you're travelling from Amersham to Epping which would probably take not far off 2 hours at the best of times , and theres lots of delays. So as well as being late you get charged more for the privilege. It just beggars belief really. They have increased the limit by half an hour than it used to be, and they've added the warning about it to the fares booklet. So imaginary passengers are being looked after better than ever. U |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 8, 11:38 am, Mr Thant
wrote: They have increased the limit by half an hour than it used to be, and they've added the warning about it to the fares booklet. Oh , thats all right then. I'm sure everyone makes sure they get a copy of and read the fares booklet, especially the small print. So imaginary passengers are being looked after better than ever. They might not be common but these sorts of journeys will happen. But then lets be honest - this is just another cynical way of making a bit of extra money isn't it which they couldn't get away with under the old paper ticket system. B2003 |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 8, 11:56*am, wrote:
On Dec 8, 11:38 am, Mr Thant wrote: They have increased the limit by half an hour than it used to be, and they've added the warning about it to the fares booklet. Oh , thats all right then. I'm sure everyone makes sure they get a copy of and read the fares booklet, especially the small print. So imaginary passengers are being looked after better than ever. They might not be common but these sorts of journeys will happen. But then lets be honest - this is just another cynical way of making a bit of extra money isn't it which they couldn't get away with under the old paper ticket system. I don't think the Oyster problems are necessarily as cynical as all that. It's more a case of something that's been common in organisations I've worked in. That is, instead of thoroughly documenting the business process that are carried out by the organisation and then specking a new computer system to support them, new processes are invented on the hoof just because the system happens to be able to do them, and whatever it can't do is left out (because the need wasn't documented). Where the legacy system continues to operate in parallel, there are then glaring inconsistencies (eg no automatic assumption of having gone beyond your zones with a travelcard, but automatic assumption of guilt with Oyster). However, I do get frustrated by the refusal to fix the problems once they emerge and have simple solutions. |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 8, 12:08 pm, MIG wrote:
I don't think the Oyster problems are necessarily as cynical as all that. I do. Think about it - if someone hasn't touched out for a number of hours then they've probably left the system anyway somehow without having to do it - in which case they'll just get a penalty fair next time they touch in anyway - or they're delayed or waiting for friends/ family inside the gates somewhere. I simply can't think of any good reason for this surcharge other than to cynically extract more money from passengers, knowing full well that most people won't bother to check how much money has been taken off when they exit and even if they did probably wouldn't realise they'd been scammed. However, I do get frustrated by the refusal to fix the problems once they emerge and have simple solutions. Simple - if it makes TfL/LU more money then its not seen as a problem. B2003 |
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
|
TfL 2009 fares leaflet
On Dec 8, 8:47*pm, Chris Hills wrote:
On 08/12/08 13:33, wrote: Simple - if it makes TfL/LU more money then its not seen as a problem. I do not understand the logic. When exiting at a station with barriers, it should be obvious to the system that a touch out preceeded by a touch in are part of the same journey. When it comes to stations with no barriers however, it seems that you will get charged for 2 unresolved journeys. There should not be many stations without barriers. The majority without are DLR stations which have standalone pads. However, these are often very badly placed. At Greenwich it's still possible (although a new pad seems to have been added it's still badly placed) to leave the front of the train and head for the station exit without passing any Oyster pad. There's no barriers or pads at the main exit and it's a long way back, even if you knew where the pad was. There should be one by the wall at the tunnel end of the DLR platform. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 10:42 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk