Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Recliner" wrote in
: wrote in message On Dec 9, 5:14 pm, "Recliner" wrote: Did you actually see the programme? In it, the nuclear bomb was apparently squeezed into a fairly ordinary looking leather briefcase, casually carried by someone purporting to be just another commuter. It certainly didn't weigh 68kg, nor was it the size of a large backpack. So my statement stands. Right, because a commuter carrying an explosive backpack on the tube would immediately be clocked as suspicious. Anyway , that was 30 years ago - who knows what classified munitions they have now that could fit in a suitcase. In the Spooks story, this was an old Russian (pretending to be American) bomb, placed with a sleeper. And it was in a briefcase, not a suitcase. I suspect that there's only so far you can miniaturise a nuclear bomb. You need a certain mass of the fissile material (presumably enriched uranium), plus various other essential components, including shielding and conventional explosives. The only thing that may have got smaller in recent years is the electronics, if any. But have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_mass and you will see that there are some isotopes that have a critical mass that could very definitely fit into a briefcase. Hopefully these isotopes are not available in Woolworths. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Spooks and Sliding Doors | London Transport | |||
Which stations/lines were used in last nights spooks? | London Transport | |||
Underground Stations that don't have the letters from Underground in them | London Transport |