London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old January 6th 09, 08:35 PM posted to uk.transport.london,uk.local.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2004
Posts: 35
Default are train fares necessary?

In article
s.com, thedarkman writes

Have you read my letter and the associated mathematics? No ticket
staff, no revenue protection and therefore no prosecutions for
fraudulent travel, which costs millions in court time and stuff. If
all the money comes from one source - Central Government - you cut
out the costs associated with the other two. All of them.

There is no reason for charging for travel at the time of use -
it is just policy. Especially the policy of the present
control-freak lot, who like to know what everyone is doing - and
most tickets these days are bought in ways which allow the buyer
to be identified - but previous more liberal (small "l"!)
governments probably felt the same way.
Consider TV licences - probably 95% of households have TV, as
opposed to the (roughly) 50% of the population who use trains -
but *all* governments have stubbornly refused to fund the BBC
from general tax revenues. (It would be interesting to know the
cost of the department which chases up non-licence-holders
compared with the amount of revenue "lost".)
--
Bill Borland


  #12   Report Post  
Old January 7th 09, 11:11 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,392
Default are train fares necessary?

On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:55:50AM -0800, Chris wrote:

Why should someone in darkest Cornwall have to pay for the costs of
London (& other large cities)? (through their taxes, of
course)


Why should someone in London have to pay for the costs of Cornwall?
Cos that's what we do right now.

--
David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice

Seven o'clock in the morning is something that
happens to those less fortunate than me
  #13   Report Post  
Old January 7th 09, 07:42 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jan 2009
Posts: 9
Default are train fares necessary?


All the objections you're raising are non-economic;
safety is certainly not an issue. Abolishing fares would generate
massive increases in wealth for all concerned. Also check out the
bigger pictu

http://www.financialreform.info/



On 7 Jan, 12:11, David Cantrell wrote:
On Sun, Jan 04, 2009 at 04:55:50AM -0800, Chris wrote:
Why should someone in darkest Cornwall have to pay for the costs of
London (& other large cities)? (through their taxes, of
course)


Why should someone in London have to pay for the costs of Cornwall?
Cos that's what we do right now.

--
David Cantrell | Minister for Arbitrary Justice

* * Seven o'clock in the morning is something that
* * happens to those less fortunate than me




Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Full 2011 fares now on the TfL website (inc. NR PAYG fares) Mizter T London Transport 6 December 9th 10 09:29 PM
Is the teacup necessary? Walter Briscoe London Transport 68 April 23rd 09 08:35 AM
Is Woolwich really necessary - Crossrail Bob London Transport 5 November 1st 06 06:56 AM
"Due to necessary engineering work...." K London Transport 6 March 29th 05 10:09 AM
Qualifications necessary to become a station rank taxi driver Oleg Kirov London Transport 4 July 7th 04 01:58 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:07 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017