London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old June 15th 09, 11:33 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2009
Posts: 33
Default Borisbus inching forward?

On Jun 15, 12:19*pm, "Richard J." wrote:
Roland Perry wrote on 15 June 2009 09:54:24 ...

In message , at 22:40:37
on Sun, 14 Jun 2009, Richard J. remarked:
I don't really see how dwell times at stops would be significantly
reduced by having a rear platform.


Because people can get on and off whenever the bus stops, and not have
to wait until it's got all the way to the official bus stop and then
opened its doors. Especially if it's stuck in traffic, most of the
getting on and off will happen away from the official bus stops.


Surely it will be mainly getting off that will happen like that? *Most
people will wait at bus stops, and the dwell time to enable them to load
will be little affected.

You're suggesting that the rear platform will be used for entry as well
as exit. *If so, you'll have longer dwell times due to conflicting flows.


I have to ask why on earth have a rear platform unless it is used for
both flows? Are you assuming that people only enter via a front door
and people exit solely via a open platform rear door? If that's the
plan (and who knows what it actually is) then you might as well go and
buy some Neoman Lion City deckers in a Berlin stylee and use those.
They're pretty "iconic" buses in their own right and it saves on
several manufacturers wasting time and effort mucking about with their
existing designs to shove a door at the back.

Several foreign manufacturers do build chassis with vertical corner
mounted engines that could, in theory, sit under a rear staircase and
permit an open platform but that design of engine location is
completely contrary to UK garage design / maintenance practice. This
is why the first version of the Volvo B7 double decker was so
unpopular - Volvo went away and designed a transverse engined design
for the UK. If we end up with such buses in London then how much will
the operators charge to modify their garages to deal with the new
buses? Oh dear, more money and more time to get them into service.
And finally I am not aware that any hybrid bus design has vertically
located power components - they all seem to be to a transverse design.

--
Paul C
via google
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Borisbus sandwich drama DRH[_2_] London Transport 0 April 20th 15 08:56 AM
Toy Borisbus Arthur Figgis London Transport 2 December 13th 14 07:41 PM
My first ride on a Borisbus [email protected] London Transport 5 December 8th 12 08:32 AM
BorisBus prototype pictures - BBC News Bruce[_2_] London Transport 63 September 20th 10 10:02 AM
Final design for the "New Bus for London" (aka BorisBus / newRoutemaster) unveiled Mizter T London Transport 55 May 24th 10 02:01 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017