Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

Paul Corfield wrote:

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

I'm still waiting for a response to two out of three e-mails I sent to
LBL Customer Services back in May. I've had a response to the last of
the mails I sent, but not either of the first two. :-(

The subject being the atrocious operation of First's route W6 (Edmonton
Green Bus Station - Southgate Station), where I had a 45 minute wait for
a bus on May Day Bank Holiday Monday (when buses are supposed to be
every 15 minutes), a 30 minute wait on Wednesday of the same week (when
they're supposed to be every 10) and an effective 40 minute wait at
Southgate the following week (when they're every 20 minutes) due to the
bus doing a short working before it had even left Southgate, despite
being on time!

Cheers,

Barry

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Thanks

If you do get a reply, please post it here.

This problem is going a major pain, especially as over the next three
weekends there is no service on the Victoria line, and the replacement
buses will not be able to stop there.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 8, 7:44*am, Barry Salter wrote:
Paul Corfield wrote:
I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

I'm still waiting for a response to two out of three e-mails I sent to
LBL Customer Services back in May. I've had a response to the last of
the mails I sent, but not either of the first two. :-(

The subject being the atrocious operation of First's route W6 (Edmonton
Green Bus Station - Southgate Station), where I had a 45 minute wait for
a bus on May Day Bank Holiday Monday (when buses are supposed to be
every 15 minutes), a 30 minute wait on Wednesday of the same week (when
they're supposed to be every 10) and an effective 40 minute wait at
Southgate the following week (when they're every 20 minutes) due to the
bus doing a short working before it had even left Southgate, despite
being on time!

While I appreciate it's a TfL tendered service and therefore an
approach to TfL is the recommended route I would be tempted to send
something in via the First London website as well. When First ran the
123 a few years back I would regularly send First my praise as well as
my complaints and the response time was generally pretty quick.

--
Paul C
via Google

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:44:23 +0100
Barry Salter wrote:
The subject being the atrocious operation of First's route W6 (Edmonton
Green Bus Station - Southgate Station), where I had a 45 minute wait for
a bus on May Day Bank Holiday Monday (when buses are supposed to be
every 15 minutes), a 30 minute wait on Wednesday of the same week (when
they're supposed to be every 10) and an effective 40 minute wait at
Southgate the following week (when they're every 20 minutes) due to the
bus doing a short working before it had even left Southgate, despite
being on time!

And ecomentalists wonder why people drive cars.

B2003

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Don't Arriva run the 123 at the moment? Their website makes it clear
that for any comments about London Bus services you should contact Tfl
direct. They only want to be contacted directly for enquiries about
lost property.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 8, 11:53*am, Paul wrote:
On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:





On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Don't Arriva run the 123 at the moment? Their website makes it clear
that for any comments about London Bus services you should contact Tfl
direct. They only want to be contacted directly for enquiries about
lost property

Yes Arriva do run the 123 *now* - don't I know it! Interestingly my
last complaint - about driver behaviour - went to TfL but the reply
came from Arriva which was something of a surprise.

My earlier response referred to a few years ago when First ran things.
The complaints process has changed since then but I was simply
remarking that I found First to be helpful and my suggested E Mail
would be *in addition* to the complaint Barry has sent to TfL.

The issue about the bus station is completely a TfL decision and the
operators would have no comment to make.

--
Paul C
via Google

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 8 July, 13:05, plcd1 wrote:
On Jul 8, 11:53*am, Paul wrote:





On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Don't Arriva run the 123 at the moment? Their website makes it clear
that for any comments about London Bus services you should contact Tfl
direct. They only want to be contacted directly for enquiries about
lost property

Yes Arriva do run the 123 *now* - don't I know it! *Interestingly my
last complaint - about driver behaviour - went to TfL but the reply
came from Arriva which was something of a surprise.

My earlier response referred to a few years ago when First ran things.
The complaints process has changed since then but I was simply
remarking that I found First to be helpful and my suggested E Mail
would be *in addition* to the complaint Barry has sent to TfL.

The issue about the bus station is completely a TfL decision and the
operators would have no comment to make.

--
Paul C
via Google- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thinking about it, the only possible "safety concern" that I can think
of is that someone from "Health And Safety" has deemed it "unsafe" for
buses on the through routes (123, 230, W4 and N73) to pass buses on
the terminating routes (41 and 192) that are on stand. Granted there
is limited clearance, but I am not aware of any serious accidents or
fatalities. Even if there had been an accident, the problem could be
solved by making sure that buses on stand only park in designated
areas. How typical of Tfl to not give a flying f**k about passengers,
and find a solution which causes them as much inconvenience as
possible. I would not like to be member of LU staff there on Saturday
(when there is no Victoria line running) having to explain why the
replacement buses toward Walthamstow are having to sail past the bus
station without stopping.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 8 July, 13:25, Paul wrote:
On 8 July, 13:05, plcd1 wrote:





On Jul 8, 11:53*am, Paul wrote:

On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Don't Arriva run the 123 at the moment? Their website makes it clear
that for any comments about London Bus services you should contact Tfl
direct. They only want to be contacted directly for enquiries about
lost property

Yes Arriva do run the 123 *now* - don't I know it! *Interestingly my
last complaint - about driver behaviour - went to TfL but the reply
came from Arriva which was something of a surprise.

My earlier response referred to a few years ago when First ran things.
The complaints process has changed since then but I was simply
remarking that I found First to be helpful and my suggested E Mail
would be *in addition* to the complaint Barry has sent to TfL.

The issue about the bus station is completely a TfL decision and the
operators would have no comment to make.

--
Paul C
via Google- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thinking about it, the only possible "safety concern" that I can think
of is that someone from "Health And Safety" has deemed it "unsafe" for
buses on the through routes (123, 230, W4 and N73) to pass buses on
the terminating routes (41 and 192) that are on stand. Granted there
is limited clearance, but I am not aware of any serious accidents or
fatalities. Even if there had been an accident, the problem could be
solved by making sure that buses on stand only park in designated
areas. How typical of Tfl to not give a flying f**k about passengers,
and find a solution which causes them as much inconvenience as
possible. I would not like to be member of LU staff there on Saturday
(when there is no Victoria line running) having to explain why the
replacement buses toward Walthamstow are having to sail past the bus
station without stopping.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have now received the following reply from London Buses

Thank you for contacting me regarding Tottenham Hale Bus Station. I
am sorry you are unhappy with the current stopping arrangements.

As stated on our website, routes 123, 230, W4 and N73 will no longer
be serving the station. Concerns were recently raised that, in order
to ensure the safety of alighting passengers, bus numbers should be
reduced in the station. Now that these numbers have been reduced,
routes 41 and 192, which terminate at Tottenham Hale, continue to use
the station.
We appreciate that this is not an ideal situation. Discussions are
taking place to see if an improved solution can be found, and we will
be monitoring the situation closely. I apologise for any
inconvenience caused.
Thank you again for raising your concerns with us. If I can be of any
help in the future, please feel free to contact me.

As I said previously, how typical of Tfl to think of a solution which
causes the maximum inconvenience to passengers - how many accidents
have there actually been, and have any of these been serious?

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 8 July, 15:20, Paul wrote:
On 8 July, 13:25, Paul wrote:





On 8 July, 13:05, plcd1 wrote:

On Jul 8, 11:53*am, Paul wrote:

On 7 July, 20:30, Paul Corfield wrote:

On Tue, 7 Jul 2009 04:52:52 -0700 (PDT), Paul
wrote:

Does anyone know what the "safety concerns" are which mean that routes
123, 230, N73 and W4, plus the Victoria Line replacement buses are not
able to call at the bus station in an eastbound direction? *If the bus
station is unsafe, how is it that routes 41 and 192 are still able to
call there? Is this situation likely to last for a long time? I ask as
my e-mail to London Buses on the subject has, unsurprisingly, not been
answered.

No but I have raised a query internally today that covers the points you
mention and some others besides.

I hate to say it but in my experience you do not get quick responses to
E Mails to TfL Customer Services. It may take a couple of weeks - my
last query took a very long time due to computer system problems for
which TfL apologised.

--
Paul C

Don't Arriva run the 123 at the moment? Their website makes it clear
that for any comments about London Bus services you should contact Tfl
direct. They only want to be contacted directly for enquiries about
lost property

Yes Arriva do run the 123 *now* - don't I know it! *Interestingly my
last complaint - about driver behaviour - went to TfL but the reply
came from Arriva which was something of a surprise.

My earlier response referred to a few years ago when First ran things..
The complaints process has changed since then but I was simply
remarking that I found First to be helpful and my suggested E Mail
would be *in addition* to the complaint Barry has sent to TfL.

The issue about the bus station is completely a TfL decision and the
operators would have no comment to make.

--
Paul C
via Google- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Thinking about it, the only possible "safety concern" that I can think
of is that someone from "Health And Safety" has deemed it "unsafe" for
buses on the through routes (123, 230, W4 and N73) to pass buses on
the terminating routes (41 and 192) that are on stand. Granted there
is limited clearance, but I am not aware of any serious accidents or
fatalities. Even if there had been an accident, the problem could be
solved by making sure that buses on stand only park in designated
areas. How typical of Tfl to not give a flying f**k about passengers,
and find a solution which causes them as much inconvenience as
possible. I would not like to be member of LU staff there on Saturday
(when there is no Victoria line running) having to explain why the
replacement buses toward Walthamstow are having to sail past the bus
station without stopping.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have now received the following reply from London Buses

Thank you for contacting me regarding Tottenham Hale Bus Station. *I
am sorry you are unhappy with the current stopping arrangements.

As stated on our website, routes 123, 230, W4 and N73 will no longer
be serving the station. *Concerns were recently raised that, in order
to ensure the safety of alighting passengers, bus numbers should be
reduced in the station. *Now that these numbers have been reduced,
routes 41 and 192, which terminate at Tottenham Hale, continue to use
the station.
We appreciate that this is not an ideal situation. *Discussions are
taking place to see if an improved solution can be found, and we will
be monitoring the situation closely. *I apologise for any
inconvenience caused.
Thank you again for raising your concerns with us. *If I can be of any
help in the future, please feel free to contact me.

As I said previously, how typical of Tfl to think of a solution which
causes the maximum inconvenience to passengers - how many accidents
have there actually been, and have any of these been serious?- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

It's funny, last time I went that way on a 123, I was surprised to
find it going into the bus station, it not having done so during the
many years when I used it a lot, although I remember the 41 always
being there (is it the least-changed route in London?).

I am stuggling to understand what the problem is though. Surely the
whole point of bus stations is to have buses in them. Or are they
referring to railway passengers having to pass too many buses?

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 8, 3:20*pm, Paul wrote:

On 8 July, 13:25, Paul wrote:

Thinking about it, the only possible "safety concern" that I can think
of is that someone from "Health And Safety" has deemed it "unsafe" for
buses on the through routes (123, 230, W4 and N73) to pass buses on
the terminating routes (41 and 192) that are on stand. Granted there
is limited clearance, but I am not aware of any serious accidents or
fatalities. Even if there had been an accident, the problem could be
solved by making sure that buses on stand only park in designated
areas. How typical of Tfl to not give a flying f**k about passengers,
and find a solution which causes them as much inconvenience as
possible. I would not like to be member of LU staff there on Saturday
(when there is no Victoria line running) having to explain why the
replacement buses toward Walthamstow are having to sail past the bus
station without stopping.


I have now received the following reply from London Buses

Thank you for contacting me regarding Tottenham Hale Bus Station. *I
am sorry you are unhappy with the current stopping arrangements.

As stated on our website, routes 123, 230, W4 and N73 will no longer
be serving the station. *Concerns were recently raised that, in order
to ensure the safety of alighting passengers, bus numbers should be
reduced in the station. *Now that these numbers have been reduced,
routes 41 and 192, which terminate at Tottenham Hale, continue to use
the station.
We appreciate that this is not an ideal situation. *Discussions are
taking place to see if an improved solution can be found, and we will
be monitoring the situation closely. *I apologise for any
inconvenience caused.
Thank you again for raising your concerns with us. *If I can be of any
help in the future, please feel free to contact me.

As I said previously, how typical of Tfl to think of a solution which
causes the maximum inconvenience to passengers - how many accidents
have there actually been, and have any of these been serious?


If you want to take this further you could perhaps put in an FOI
request for documents relating to this decision. That might highlight
the incidents that have apparently occurred. You could also try asking
the staff at the station, the bus drivers (or controllers if there are
any about), or even the shopkeeper in the station building or the bods
in the minicab office whether they know about any particular incidents
of late.

I quite agree that on the face of it, it seems a trifle absurd.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

"Paul" wrote in message
...

I have now received the following reply from London Buses

Thank you for contacting me regarding Tottenham Hale Bus Station. I
am sorry you are unhappy with the current stopping arrangements.

As stated on our website, routes 123, 230, W4 and N73 will no longer
be serving the station. Concerns were recently raised that, in order
to ensure the safety of alighting passengers, bus numbers should be
reduced in the station. Now that these numbers have been reduced,
routes 41 and 192, which terminate at Tottenham Hale, continue to use
the station.
We appreciate that this is not an ideal situation. Discussions are
taking place to see if an improved solution can be found, and we will
be monitoring the situation closely. I apologise for any
inconvenience caused.
Thank you again for raising your concerns with us. If I can be of any
help in the future, please feel free to contact me.

As I said previously, how typical of Tfl to think of a solution which
causes the maximum inconvenience to passengers - how many accidents
have there actually been, and have any of these been serious?

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Peter Smyth

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 8 July, 22:30, "Peter Smyth" wrote:
"Paul" wrote in message

...





I have now received the following reply from London Buses

Thank you for contacting me regarding Tottenham Hale Bus Station. *I
am sorry you are unhappy with the current stopping arrangements.

As stated on our website, routes 123, 230, W4 and N73 will no longer
be serving the station. *Concerns were recently raised that, in order
to ensure the safety of alighting passengers, bus numbers should be
reduced in the station. *Now that these numbers have been reduced,
routes 41 and 192, which terminate at Tottenham Hale, continue to use
the station.
We appreciate that this is not an ideal situation. *Discussions are
taking place to see if an improved solution can be found, and we will
be monitoring the situation closely. *I apologise for any
inconvenience caused.
Thank you again for raising your concerns with us. *If I can be of any
help in the future, please feel free to contact me.

As I said previously, how typical of Tfl to think of a solution which
causes the maximum inconvenience to passengers - how many accidents
have there actually been, and have any of these been serious?

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Peter Smyth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I have written to Tfl suggesting that

(a) buses on all routes can only set down or pick up if they are
adjacent to the kerb
(b) buses on stand at the terminus should only park in specially
designated areas, so that there is enough room for buses on the
through routes to pass safely
(c) A suitable speed restriction is imposed in the bus station

This should reduce any risk to an acceptable level, although I do
realise that a busy times there can sometimes be a queue of buses
waiting to pass through the bus station.

Considering the large number of people who board and alight from the
through routes at the bus station, it seems that many people are being
inconvenienced for a relatively small risk. I don't think that Tfl
have really thought this one through properly.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

Peter Smyth wrote:

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

Cheers,

Barry

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 9 July, 15:40, Barry Salter wrote:
Peter Smyth wrote:
It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

Cheers,

Barry

The N73 is a normal double decker, and not a bendy bus. Of all the
routes that use the bus station, it will have the least trouble
getting round, especially at 3am when the N41 is the only other bus
still running.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

Barry Salter wrote in news:7bmdrbF247r5vU2
@mid.individual.net:

Peter Smyth wrote:

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 10 July, 03:52, James Farrar wrote:
Barry Salter wrote in news:7bmdrbF247r5vU2
@mid.individual.net:

Peter Smyth wrote:

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Not the 453?

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 10, 7:31*am, MIG wrote:

On 10 July, 03:52, James Farrar wrote:

Barry Salter wrote:

Peter Smyth wrote:

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Not the 453?

The N453 is indeed a bendy bus.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 10 July, 10:21, Mizter T wrote:
On Jul 10, 7:31*am, MIG wrote:





On 10 July, 03:52, James Farrar wrote:

Barry Salter wrote:

Peter Smyth wrote:

It seems odd that the N73 can't stop there. Is Tottenham Hale Bus
Station really that busy in the middle of the night?

Isn't the N73 an artic? I can't see one of those getting around the loop
all that easily.

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Not the 453?

The N453 is indeed a bendy bus.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I realised after that his 153 must be a typo for 453, which I think is
just 24-hour rather than a N.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 10, 7:16*pm, MIG wrote:

On 10 July, 10:21, Mizter T wrote:

On Jul 10, 7:31*am, MIG wrote:

On 10 July, 03:52, James Farrar wrote:

[snip]

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Not the 453?

The N453 is indeed a bendy bus.

I realised after that his 153 must be a typo for 453, which I think is
just 24-hour rather than a N.

It is indeed, you are correct, and James did a typo - the 24-hour 453
is featured here on the Westminster night bus map:
http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/gettingaro...uses-11497.pdf

I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in teh
results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of a bus
stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and N453:
http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay before
you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of there
being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so far wide of
the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was dropped and the
daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 10 July, 19:37, Mizter T wrote:
On Jul 10, 7:16*pm, MIG wrote:





On 10 July, 10:21, Mizter T wrote:

On Jul 10, 7:31*am, MIG wrote:

On 10 July, 03:52, James Farrar wrote:

[snip]

londonbusroutes.net says that the only night bus routes that run bendies
are the 12, 25, N29, 149 and 153.

Not the 453?

The N453 is indeed a bendy bus.

I realised after that his 153 must be a typo for 453, which I think is
just 24-hour rather than a N.

It is indeed, you are correct, and James did a typo - the 24-hour 453
is featured here on the Westminster night bus map:http://www.tfl.gov.uk/tfl/gettingaro...westminsternig...

I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in teh
results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of a bus
stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and N453:http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay before
you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of there
being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so far wide of
the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was dropped and the
daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

I ought to know, but I can't remember. Other changes did happen
fairly recently though, around the defunct N36 being replaced by a
N136 plus the 36 going 24-hour.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in teh
results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of a bus
stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and N453:
http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay before
you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of there
being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so far wide of
the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was dropped and the
daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften people
up for their introduction.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On 10 July, 20:58, wrote:
In article
,

(Mizter T) wrote:
I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in teh
results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of a bus
stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and N453:
http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay before
you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of there
being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so far wide of
the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was dropped and the
daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften people
up for their introduction.

I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

MIG wrote:
I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

You're correct (apart from the 453 running with deckers for the first
month or so at first until the artics were delivered). So the yellow
plates would have been on the stops for all of about a week before the
routes were over to pay before boarding.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

In article
,
(MIG) wrote:

On 10 July, 20:58, wrote:
In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:
I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in
teh results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of
a bus stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and
N453:

http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay
before you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of
there being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so
far wide of the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was
dropped and the daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften
people up for their introduction.

I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

You might be right. I'm not sure even though I was cycling amongst them at
the time.

It doesn't detract from my point that off-bus ticketing came in before the
end of the Routemasters. They couldn't be scrapped without off bus
ticketing being in place and well established first.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 10, 10:26*pm, John Swallow wrote:

MIG wrote:
I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. *They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

You're correct (apart from the 453 running with deckers for the first
month or so at first until the artics were delivered). So the yellow
plates would have been on the stops for all of about a week before the
routes were over to pay before boarding.

Yes, I sort of remember that remember that - a great fleet of double-
deckers was laid on instead. I'm guessing they operated as per normal,
with the driver checking the tickets.

I've a vague recollection of double-deckers stood in for bendy buses
on some routes after the artics had been withdrawn after a number of
them infamously caught fire - however I've just found this BBC News
story from 2004 which states they were withdrawn altogether on few
bendy bus routes pending modifications:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/3563279.stm
---quote---
There are no services on the 436, 453 and 521. Reduced services are
operating on the number 18, 293, 507, and RV1 have been replaced by
ordinary buses.

Extra services are running on routes 36, 53 and 185.
---quote---

So it seems my recollection is wrong (unless there was a separate
incidence of this happening, but on reflection I don't think there
was). Interesting to see that at least some of the 18, 507 and RV1 (a
non-bendy Citaro) fleets were apparently considered ok enough to be
out on the street - maybe they'd had the crucial modifications done.
(And the 293 - that's not an artic - is it a Citaro then?)

I'm half-curious to know whether the 36 and 53 were extended to cover
the extra stretches normally covered by the missing bendies (that's
New Cross to Lewisham for the 436, and Whitehall/Horse Guards to
Marylebone for the 453). Maybe other routes were left to take the
strain (though no other route from Whitehall or Trafalgar Square
exactly replicates the 453).

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 10, 10:07*pm, MIG wrote:

On 10 July, 20:58, wrote:

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:
I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in teh
results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of a bus
stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and N453:
http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay before
you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of there
being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so far wide of
the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was dropped and the
daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften people
up for their introduction.

I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. *They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

Yes, the 453 was indeed a 'new' route (as John Swallow conforms
downthread), as was the 436 - they''ve been bendy bus routes from the
outset (though see John's caveat re the 453). These are two routes
that I really don't think will cope well with being 'de-bendified'.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

On Jul 10, 10:45 pm, wrote:

In article
,
(MIG) wrote:

On 10 July, 20:58, wrote:
In article
,

(Mizter T) wrote:
I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead of
checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a Google
image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first thumbnails in
the results led me to this page - which has an out of date photo of
a bus stop at Baker Street which displays 'plates' for both 453 and
N453:

http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as they
both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy tickets
before boarding" (and it's just outside the central London 'pay
before you board' area too). So my half-remembered recollection of
there being a distinct N453 service in the recent past wasn't so
far wide of the mark! I'm not sure when the separate N453 was
dropped and the daytime 453 went 24-hours though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften
people up for their introduction.

I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

You might be right. I'm not sure even though I was cycling amongst them at
the time.

It doesn't detract from my point that off-bus ticketing came in before the
end of the Routemasters. They couldn't be scrapped without off bus
ticketing being in place and well established first.

Hmmm... that's not really right. Let me run through the choronology...

* First off I recall seeing an installation of several roadside ticket
machines at the new Waterloo 'bus plaza' - next to the big roundabout
(with the IMAX in the middle) - quite some time ago - 2001 maybe, or
2002, I'm really not too sure (dunno if this was pre-or-post
bendification of the 521). I *think* this was the first time I'd come
across these machines - it was certainly the first time I'd used one,
and I bought a one-day bus pass that was viewed with a somewhat
quizzical suspicion by the drivers I presented it to that day (I think
it was only a couple of buses).

* The first bendy bus routes in London were the Red Arrow routes 507
and 521, introduced on 5 June 2002 - source:
http://www.londonbusroutes.net/photos/507.htm
Obviously as these were going to be 'buy before you board' routes,
like all bendy bus routes to come, then roadside ticket machines had
to be installed at all the bus stops served by these two routes.

I presume the yellow plates (on the bus totem signs) with the
instruction to 'buy tickets before boarding' came in at this point. It
should however be noted that the 507 and 521 buses are only used by a
very small sub-set of London's bus passengers - notably, commuters
heading to and from London termini stations (the market they're
essentially aimed at).

* The next bendy bus route was the 436, introduced on 8 February 2003
- source:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...fdea99d9aeb9ae

* And a week after that, the 453 was introduced on the 15 February
2003 - source:
http://www.londonbusroutes.net/photos/453.htm

In the case of both of these routes, again, roadside ticket machines
needed to be installed at all the bus stops they served.

I'm not quite sure if any new bendy bus routes were introduced over
the next few months, bit the next event I want to highlight is...

* The central London 'pay before you board' area was introduced on 23
August 2003 - this was a big change and meant that passengers had to
buy their tickets before boarding any bus in the area, whether bendy
or not. This led to yellow plates indication the requirement to 'buy
before you board' being introduced across the whole of the affected
area.
My source for the date is this webpage held in the Internet Archive -
see the URL for confirmation of the year:
http://web.archive.org/web/200308061...y-before.shtml

So whilst the apparatus of the roadside ticketing machines *had* to be
in place before the introduction of these routes, to say it was "well
established" is I think wrong. For the great majority of passengers on
the 436 and 453 routes, it was an entirely new concept (as evidenced
by the number of people trying to pay the driver in the early days).
Whilst the Red Arrow (507 and 521) buses had 'buy before you board'
first, most pax on the 436 and 453 routes won't have been using Red
Arrow buses and hence won't have been exposed to the 'buy before you
board' scenario beforehand.

Even after the August 2003 introduction of the central London 'pay
before you board' area, any notion that this would instantly have
educated all Londoners about the concept of 'buy before you board'
wouldn't be right - many Londoners use buses in central London
infrequently, and the idea that all Londoners are well versed in the
ways of central London ain't true either.

In essence, off bus ticketing got established as it went along, when
bendy bus routes were introduced and when the central London 'pay
before you board' area came into being. It simply wasn't well
established before this, not by any means.

One quick last thing - you seem to imply that all the Routemaster
routes were replaced by bendy buses. This certainly wasn't universally
the case - off the top of my head, the 14, 19 and 159 were converted
straight from Routemasters to OPO double-deckers.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

Mizter T wrote:

I've a vague recollection of double-deckers stood in for bendy buses
on some routes after the artics had been withdrawn after a number of
them infamously caught fire ...

Yes, that's right.

For example, Stagecoach used its own Tridents (I think from Hull if
memory serves) on the 453, so in full white-based livery (and the world
didn't end because they used non-red buses, but that's another story
entirely :) ).

(And the 293 - that's not an artic - is it a Citaro then?)

The 293 at the time was operated by Epsom Coaches with conventional
Citaro single deckers. It isn't anymore.

I'm half-curious to know whether the 36 and 53 were extended to cover
the extra stretches normally covered by the missing bendies (that's
New Cross to Lewisham for the 436, and Whitehall/Horse Guards to
Marylebone for the 453). Maybe other routes were left to take the
strain (though no other route from Whitehall or Trafalgar Square
exactly replicates the 453).

There were no service changes during the bendy-off-the-road saga. Most
routes eventually had something, even if was ridiculous things like
recently-withdrawn single door Darts trying to run limited Red Arrow
services.

Tottenham Hale Bus Station
 

In article
,
(Mizter T) wrote:

On Jul 10, 10:45 pm, wrote:

In article
,
(MIG) wrote:

On 10 July, 20:58, wrote:
In article
,

(Mizter T) wrote:
I couldn't remember if it was a 24 hour route or not, so instead
of checking a bus spider map or the TfL journey planner I did a
Google image search for "n453 london bus", one of the first
thumbnails in the results led me to this page - which has an out
of date photo of a bus stop at Baker Street which displays
'plates' for both 453 and N453:

http://www.ukstudentlife.com/Travel/...uses.htm#Stops

It's obviously taken after the introduction of bendy buses, as
they both appear on yellow 'plates' with the advice/warning "Buy
tickets before boarding" (and it's just outside the central
London 'pay before you board' area too). So my half-remembered
recollection of there being a distinct N453 service in the
recent past wasn't so far wide of the mark! I'm not sure when
the separate N453 was dropped and the daytime 453 went 24-hours
though.

Surely yellow plates came in some time before the bendys to soften
people up for their introduction.

I don't think there was such a thing as a 453 before bendys though.
Or a 436. They made overlapping sections with the 53 and 36 which
were shortened, and my impression was that it happened with
bendification.

You might be right. I'm not sure even though I was cycling amongst
them at the time.

It doesn't detract from my point that off-bus ticketing came in before
the end of the Routemasters. They couldn't be scrapped without off bus
ticketing being in place and well established first.

Hmmm... that's not really right. Let me run through the choronology...

* First off I recall seeing an installation of several roadside ticket
machines at the new Waterloo 'bus plaza' - next to the big roundabout
(with the IMAX in the middle) - quite some time ago - 2001 maybe, or
2002, I'm really not too sure (dunno if this was pre-or-post
bendification of the 521). I *think* this was the first time I'd come
across these machines - it was certainly the first time I'd used one,
and I bought a one-day bus pass that was viewed with a somewhat
quizzical suspicion by the drivers I presented it to that day (I think
it was only a couple of buses).

* The first bendy bus routes in London were the Red Arrow routes 507
and 521, introduced on 5 June 2002 - source:
http://www.londonbusroutes.net/photos/507.htm
Obviously as these were going to be 'buy before you board' routes,
like all bendy bus routes to come, then roadside ticket machines had
to be installed at all the bus stops served by these two routes.

I presume the yellow plates (on the bus totem signs) with the
instruction to 'buy tickets before boarding' came in at this point. It
should however be noted that the 507 and 521 buses are only used by a
very small sub-set of London's bus passengers - notably, commuters
heading to and from London termini stations (the market they're
essentially aimed at).

* The next bendy bus route was the 436, introduced on 8 February 2003
- source:
http://groups.google.com/group/uk.tr...fdea99d9aeb9ae

* And a week after that, the 453 was introduced on the 15 February
2003 - source:
http://www.londonbusroutes.net/photos/453.htm

In the case of both of these routes, again, roadside ticket machines
needed to be installed at all the bus stops they served.

I'm not quite sure if any new bendy bus routes were introduced over
the next few months, bit the next event I want to highlight is...

* The central London 'pay before you board' area was introduced on 23
August 2003 - this was a big change and meant that passengers had to
buy their tickets before boarding any bus in the area, whether bendy
or not. This led to yellow plates indication the requirement to 'buy
before you board' being introduced across the whole of the affected
area.
My source for the date is this webpage held in the Internet Archive -
see the URL for confirmation of the year:

http://web.archive.org/web/200308061...uk/buses/about
-pay-before.shtml

So whilst the apparatus of the roadside ticketing machines *had* to be
in place before the introduction of these routes, to say it was "well
established" is I think wrong. For the great majority of passengers on
the 436 and 453 routes, it was an entirely new concept (as evidenced
by the number of people trying to pay the driver in the early days).
Whilst the Red Arrow (507 and 521) buses had 'buy before you board'
first, most pax on the 436 and 453 routes won't have been using Red
Arrow buses and hence won't have been exposed to the 'buy before you
board' scenario beforehand.

Even after the August 2003 introduction of the central London 'pay
before you board' area, any notion that this would instantly have
educated all Londoners about the concept of 'buy before you board'
wouldn't be right - many Londoners use buses in central London
infrequently, and the idea that all Londoners are well versed in the
ways of central London ain't true either.

In essence, off bus ticketing got established as it went along, when
bendy bus routes were introduced and when the central London 'pay
before you board' area came into being. It simply wasn't well
established before this, not by any means.

One quick last thing - you seem to imply that all the Routemaster
routes were replaced by bendy buses. This certainly wasn't
universally
the case - off the top of my head, the 14, 19 and 159 were converted
straight from Routemasters to OPO double-deckers.

I think we're getting this the wrong way round. Off bus ticketing had to
be firmly established before the Routemasters with their conductors could
be done away with. They weren't all replaced by bendies of course.

--
Colin Rosenstiel