Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buddenbrooks wrote
Obviously acts after post war nationalization and before privatization would have treated BR as an arm of the government. Not so. The public corperations were deliberately created to be otherwise both before and after nationalisation. Example London and other port authorities. -- Mike D |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Michael R N Dolbear" wrote in message news:01ca5771$8abddca0$LocalHost@default... Buddenbrooks wrote Obviously acts after post war nationalization and before privatization would have treated BR as an arm of the government. Not so. The public corperations were deliberately created to be otherwise both before and after nationalisation. Example London and other port authorities. Possibly, but many laws give a special status to such places. Trespass for instance is criminal on Rail property and dockyards while it is civil on private property. I was really just covering myself in that the railway companies should only have the same rights as any other private company as far as enforcing their T&Cs but may have a carry over from state ownership days. BAA for instance can issue Compulsory Purchase Orders in the same manner as a county council. http://www.stanstedairport.com/asset...CPO_%20SoC.pdf |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Buddenbrooks wrote in article
... "Michael R N Dolbear" wrote in message news:01ca5771$8abddca0$LocalHost@default... Buddenbrooks wrote Obviously acts after post war nationalization and before privatization would have treated BR as an arm of the government. Not so. The public corperations were deliberately created to be otherwise both before and after nationalisation. Example London and other port authorities. Possibly, but many laws give a special status to such places. Trespass for instance is criminal on Rail property and dockyards while it is civil on private property. I was really just covering myself in that the railway companies should only have the same rights as any other private company as far as enforcing their T&Cs but may have a carry over from state ownership days. BAA for instance can issue Compulsory Purchase Orders in the same manner as a county council. http://www.stanstedairport.com/asset...iles/STN%20Fut ure/stn_g2_ap_Airport_CPO_%20SoC.pdf Nothing to do with ex-state ownership. Parliament gave first canal and then railway companies compulsory purchase powers long long ago. And gas companies the right to execute forcible entry without a warrant. And private dock companies the right to appoint constables. -- Mike D |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Two Heads Are Better Than One: Where Did Graham Bond Die? | London Transport | |||
Heads up - Eurostar on Radio 2 | London Transport | |||
Monday 7th July: Panorama on Heathrow | London Transport | |||
In Search Of Style on London Transport: ITV1 London, Thursday, 7:30pm to 8pm | London Transport | |||
On NOW: BBC1 | London Transport |