View Single Post
  #1   Report Post  
Old February 12th 04, 02:25 PM posted to uk.transport,uk.transport.london,england.transport
David Smith David Smith is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2004
Posts: 1
Default DESTROYING ENGLAND

DESTROYING ENGLAND

England is under siege. Our country is being systematically destroyed
to provide housing, roads, airport extentions, and other amenities,
for a population deluge that is fuelled by out-of-control immigration.
The South East of England will be worst effected. The government is
failing to build sufficient infrastructure to cope with the growth
population.

The present overwhelming flood of immigration is set to become an
explosion after 1 May 2004, when 10 countries, including Hungary,
Poland and the Czech Republic, are set to join the EU:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/3471769.stm

More people means more building and less space: less England.

The East of England Regional Assembly, an unelected body, has already
approved plans by housing minister Lord Rooker to build around 20,000
new houses in the so-called "London-Stanstead-Cambridge growth area.
The unelected EERA has already accepted government plans to build
72,000 houses in Hertfordshire alone! The unelected EERA is seeking
Green Belt or "green field" sites where a proportion of the homes will
be built, by 2021. "England's green and pleasant land" is being
systematically abolished. And so are the rights of British Nationals.

British pensioners are freezing to death in poverty in their homes,
while immigrants living on benefits are handed free cars and houses
and going on expensive holidays, all paid for by the British taxpayer.
Does charity not begin at home?

Some migrants are genuinely seeking asylum from genuine persecution.
But do other, nearer European countries not offer safe asylum? Asylum
seekers usually pass straight through several perfectly safe European
countries, including France, before arriving on our shores. Our taxes
just keep rising to pay for them.

Apparently, neglecting British Nationals while pampering foreign
illegal migrants is political correctness. It seems more like
dangerous madness.

I am far from "right wing" and I am certainly no extremist. My mother
was Jewish. I opposed the illegal war against Iraq, which was more
about oil and Israel than terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. I
have voted for a variety of political parties in the past, from the
Green Party and the Liberal Democrats, to the Conservatives (anything
to get BLiar out!)

The government is trying to downplay the problems associated with the
immigration-fuelled population explosion; perhaps because they are
afraid of pushing people to too far towards the right of the political
spectrum. But their failure to address the crisis is doing just that.

Britain is becoming overcrowded and increasingly unpleasant.
Immigration is ruining our country and many people, like me, still
love this country, (although patriotism apparently makes you a Nazi in
Britain.) Only the far-right seems prepared to take a what is only a
common-sense, self-preservation attitude to the immigration timebomb.

What are we to do? Should we stand shoulder-to-shoulder at our borders
and carry out immigration control ourselves? Should we take direct
eco-terrorist-style action against the building projects that are
killing our local communities?

Many reasonable, tolerant people today feel forced to consider voting
for far-right political parties like the BNP in order to save their
region and their country. We cannot stop extremism while it seems to
offer the only available solutions to the real problems of real
people.

Tackling immigration does not make you a Nazi. It does not mean that
you advocate genocide. It does not promote hatred.

If we are to combat extremism then we must first address the problems
that foster it.

Our quality of life, our local community, and our nation itself is
under threat. And desperate times call for desperate measures.