View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 15th 12, 02:45 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Recliner[_2_] Recliner[_2_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,008
Default Yet another new foot/cycle Thames bridge planned

Mizter T wrote:
On 15/11/2012 14:24, Recliner wrote:
I see there is a plan for a new footbridge between Chelsea Harbour and
Battersea, next to the Overground line Battersea Rail bridge:

Quote:
Proposals for a new foot and cycle bridge across the Thames — the first in
more than a decade— have been submitted for planning approval.

The white steel bridge would run alongside the existing Battersea Railway
Bridge and mark the Queen’s Diamond Jubilee.

Chris Medland, the architect who designed the structure, is hoping to
secure corporate sponsorship similar to the Barclays-backed Boris Bikes to
fund the £22 million project.

The arched construction, known as the Jubilee Footbridge, would run between
Chelsea Harbour and Lombard Road, near Battersea High Street.

It would give commuters easy access to Imperial Wharf station in Fulham and
improve links between the north and south of the river, said Mr Medland.

From
http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/-8319246.html


Not a bad idea at all, though one can't help but wonder if this anything
much more than one architect's dream at the moment? I suppose all ideas
have to start somewhere - that said, surely someone must have suggested a
pedestrian bridge here before? Must admit I've never come across it if
they have. Though I guess there wasn't all that much on the east (i.e.
'north') side of the railway bridge before the Imperial Wharf developments.


Apparently a bridge in this area was first suggested back in 1924:
http://www.london24.com/news/footbri...gacy_1_1694759

Corporate sponsorship for a bridge, with no cost to the taxpayer... well,
fair play if you can pull that one off. The dangleway was originally
supposed to be a privately funded endeavour, of course it didn't quite
happen like that - one can't help but feel that the the public money
spent on that might have been better spent on projects such as this, if
indeed it was to be spent on 'signature projects' at all (rather than
more mundane but useful stuff).


It's supposed to cost £22m, much less than the £36m that Emirates is
reported to be paying to sponsor the dangleway for ten years, or about the
same as Barclays pays for five years of Boris-bikes.