View Single Post
  #7   Report Post  
Old April 9th 15, 08:32 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Robin[_4_] Robin[_4_] is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Nov 2011
Posts: 329
Default No Woolwich Ferry because of fog?

Jarle Hammen Knudsen wrote:
On Thu, 9 Apr 2015 11:59:38 +0100, "Robin" wrote:

d wrote:
Hasn't radar been around for oh , 70 years or so? And how do they
cope in the dark?


Just think of the the fuss there'd be if a ferry rolled over a
canoe/kayak in the fog. Radar doesn't show such things.


https://mcanet.mcga.gov.uk/public/c4/solasv/index.html

Regulation 19

2.1 All ships irrespective of size shall have:

2.1.7 if less than 150 gross tonnage and if practicable, a radar
reflector or other means, to enable detection by ships navigating by
radar at both 9 and 3 GHz;


Thanks for that. Interesting; and at first blush at odds with practice -
including the practice of some former colleagues who were very compliant
with such legislation.

But I then see also that Regulation 1 provides:

"2. The Administration may decide to what extent this chapter
shall apply to ships operating solely in waters landward of the
baselines which are established in accordance with international law."

on which note guidance note 6 adds:

"6. UK Internal Waters include waters categorised by the Merchant
Shipping (Categorisation of Waters) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/2356)
which are listed in MSN 1837 - Categorisation of Waters. Such waters are
not regarded as "sea" for the purposes of Merchant Shipping legislation
(except for Marine Pollution regulations).

I find then that
https://www.gov.uk/inland-waterways-...-inland-waters
points for the scope of inland waterways in the UK to the MCA site at
https://mcanet.mcga.gov.uk/public/c4...ocid=453055527
which shows the Thames as being inland waters:

"In winter within a line from Colne Point to Whitstable
In summer within a line from Clacton Pier to Reculvers"

So I thunk that perhaps after all reg. 19 doesn't apply to canoes on the
Tideway at Woolwich.

Of course the UK may also have exercised its right under para. 2 of
regulation 1 to apply reg 19 inland; but then it may also have exercised
its right under para. 4 not to apply reg. 19 to vessels under 150 tons.
So, as so often, I'm lost without access to consolidated/keeled
statutes to fathom the law and navigate its reefs



--
Robin
reply to address is (meant to be) valid