View Single Post
  #3   Report Post  
Old May 8th 07, 05:41 PM posted to uk.transport.london
Clive D. W. Feather Clive D. W. Feather is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 856
Default Stop and proceed rule

In article , Steve Fitzgerald
] writes
Driver's knowledge is that only an automatic (running) signal (those
generally numbered Axxx) can be passed at danger in this manner.


On parts of the Northern Line this is Sxxx instead; there was a signal
box coded A once upon a time.

Then there is a further complication in that we also have things called
X-signals (usually numbered like WRX61, although we also have X855, ie
no IMR code)


Also FXD855, meaning Floodgate protecting X signal on the District. The
numbers are usually taken from the automatic signal numbering sequence
(that is, X855 or FXD855 would lie between A853 and A857).

- these are normal Automatic signals but it has been decided that they
must be treated as semi-automatic in the event of any failure. Just to
add more fun to this, an X-signal can have an illuminated 'A'
associated with it which then turns it back into a normal automatic
signal whilst the A is lit!


The reason for X signals can be something to do with the interlocking.
For example, IIRC there is an X signal approaching Kennington on the
southbound Northern Line. If you passed it towards the station, then
under some circumstances your train will approach lock the pointwork for
some period of time, something that isn't desirable. So, although it
doesn't protect anything specific like a junction, the signal is made an
X signal so that you don't pass it until the signallers have everything
set up.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org
Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work:
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is: