View Single Post
  #18   Report Post  
Old April 11th 08, 05:50 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
Tom Anderson Tom Anderson is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,188
Default Sutton Loop post Thameslink

On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Andy wrote:

On Apr 11, 3:58 pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:

Mwmbwls wrote:

With the transfer of the Thameslink Sutton Loop services to other
south eastern destinations - and their termination at Blackfriars will
these service continue to be part of the Thameslink franchise or would
they be better integrated into a southern franchise or even possibly
LOROL. Would a connection to the ELL be of advantage?


I agree that the Wimbledon loop services wouldn't need to be part of
Thameslink, (as I suggested when I raised the Wimbledons being
curtailed a week ago) but I can't see an obvious way of connecting them
to the ELL. Is there a practical route - and would the ELL have enough
capacity anyway amongst the 16 tph it will already have?


I'd imagine that the potential route would be from Tulse Hill - Peckham
Rye (rather than to Herne Hill and Blackfriars), joining ELL phase 2 at
Peckham Rye. This would avoid the flat crossing of the South Eastern
mainline at Herne Hill, but at the cost of the Blackfriars to Tulse Hill
route.


It would also avoid taking people into central London. This makes it a bit
of a non-starter. Yes, you could get to the City via Shoreditch High
Street, but this is hardly a good alternative to going via Blackfriars.
For any other destination west of Whitechapel, it's a disaster.

tom

--
Ed editor textorum probatissimus est -- Cicero, De officiis IV.7