Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Apr 2008, Andy wrote:
On Apr 11, 3:58 pm, "Paul Scott" wrote: Mwmbwls wrote: With the transfer of the Thameslink Sutton Loop services to other south eastern destinations - and their termination at Blackfriars will these service continue to be part of the Thameslink franchise or would they be better integrated into a southern franchise or even possibly LOROL. Would a connection to the ELL be of advantage? I agree that the Wimbledon loop services wouldn't need to be part of Thameslink, (as I suggested when I raised the Wimbledons being curtailed a week ago) but I can't see an obvious way of connecting them to the ELL. Is there a practical route - and would the ELL have enough capacity anyway amongst the 16 tph it will already have? I'd imagine that the potential route would be from Tulse Hill - Peckham Rye (rather than to Herne Hill and Blackfriars), joining ELL phase 2 at Peckham Rye. This would avoid the flat crossing of the South Eastern mainline at Herne Hill, but at the cost of the Blackfriars to Tulse Hill route. It would also avoid taking people into central London. This makes it a bit of a non-starter. Yes, you could get to the City via Shoreditch High Street, but this is hardly a good alternative to going via Blackfriars. For any other destination west of Whitechapel, it's a disaster. tom -- Ed editor textorum probatissimus est -- Cicero, De officiis IV.7 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thameslink loop map confusion | London Transport | |||
Morden to Sutton - still possible? | London Transport | |||
Old depot in Sutton St E1 | London Transport |