View Single Post
  #17   Report Post  
Old December 10th 08, 04:10 AM posted to uk.transport.london
Epicentre Epicentre is offline
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Feb 2005
Posts: 41
Default Spooks Underground

"Recliner" wrote in
:

wrote in message

On Dec 9, 5:14 pm, "Recliner" wrote:
Did you actually see the programme? In it, the nuclear bomb was
apparently squeezed into a fairly ordinary looking leather briefcase,
casually carried by someone purporting to be just another commuter.
It certainly didn't weigh 68kg, nor was it the size of a large
backpack. So my statement stands.


Right, because a commuter carrying an explosive backpack on the tube
would immediately be clocked as suspicious.
Anyway , that was 30 years ago - who knows what classified munitions
they have now that could fit in a suitcase.


In the Spooks story, this was an old Russian (pretending to be American)
bomb, placed with a sleeper. And it was in a briefcase, not a suitcase.

I suspect that there's only so far you can miniaturise a nuclear bomb.
You need a certain mass of the fissile material (presumably enriched
uranium), plus various other essential components, including shielding
and conventional explosives. The only thing that may have got smaller in
recent years is the electronics, if any.



But have a look at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Critical_mass and you will
see that there are some isotopes that have a critical mass that could very
definitely fit into a briefcase. Hopefully these isotopes are not available
in Woolworths.