![]() |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
On 3 Dec, 09:02, "John Nuttall" wrote:
No, LRT as I said. Just looked on Wikipedia and LRT is the "guided bus wotsit" I referred to - it runs on rubber tyres, not rails. But thanks - I must have remembered wrongly about it having PEDs. I guess your average Singapore passenger is more disciplined than on LUL, though! Neil |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
Neil Williams wrote:
On 3 Dec, 09:02, "John Nuttall" wrote: No, LRT as I said. Just looked on Wikipedia and LRT is the "guided bus wotsit" I referred to - it runs on rubber tyres, not rails. But thanks - I must have remembered wrongly about it having PEDs. I guess your average Singapore passenger is more disciplined than on LUL, though! Neil Didn't some new guided bus whatsit just start up in Cambridgeshire, BTW? |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
|
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
In article ,
" wrote: Didn't some new guided bus whatsit just start up in Cambridgeshire, BTW? Nope. Some new guided bus whatsit has just failed to start up in Cambridgeshire. Sam |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
Sam Wilson wrote:
In article , " wrote: Didn't some new guided bus whatsit just start up in Cambridgeshire, BTW? Nope. Some new guided bus whatsit has just failed to start up in Cambridgeshire. Sam Can you say what happened or where I might be able to find more information about this? |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
In article ,
" wrote: Sam Wilson wrote: In article , " wrote: Didn't some new guided bus whatsit just start up in Cambridgeshire, BTW? Nope. Some new guided bus whatsit has just failed to start up in Cambridgeshire. Sam Can you say what happened or where I might be able to find more information about this? http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/cn_n...e.asp?ID=46398 6 http://www.nce.co.uk/news/transport/...ng-delayed/521 0950.article Sam |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
On Dec 3, 1:46*am, Miles Bader wrote:
"Richard J." writes: "Due to the mixed operation of automated and conventional trains, which has been carried out in Nuremberg for a time, and the presence of curved platform, platform doors are not an option for Nuremberg metro stations." Curved platforms at some stations on Line 1 of the Paris Métro aren't preventing the installation of curved doors there. Even if curved doors are significantly more expensive or something, I don't see why they couldn't just use straight doors on a curved wall -- it would mean a very small amount of wasted space between the center of the door and the edge of the platform, but who cares...? -Miles -- Run away! *Run away! There does seem to be a dangerous design 'fault' with the DLR stock that needs the train captain's full attention. That is the huge gap between the cars. They are not fitted with a protective curtain as are most tube stock. I guess its only a matter of time before someone falls onto the track between cars and the train starts automtically with fatal consequences. CJB. |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
|
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
On 3 Dec, 19:36, CJB wrote:
On Dec 3, 1:46*am, Miles Bader wrote: "Richard J." writes: "Due to the mixed operation of automated and conventional trains, which has been carried out in Nuremberg for a time, and the presence of curved platform, platform doors are not an option for Nuremberg metro stations." Curved platforms at some stations on Line 1 of the Paris Métro aren't preventing the installation of curved doors there. Even if curved doors are significantly more expensive or something, I don't see why they couldn't just use straight doors on a curved wall -- it would mean a very small amount of wasted space between the center of the door and the edge of the platform, but who cares...? -Miles -- Run away! *Run away! There does seem to be a dangerous design 'fault' with the DLR stock that needs the train captain's full attention. That is the huge gap between the cars. They are not fitted with a protective curtain as are most tube stock. I guess its only a matter of time before someone falls onto the track between cars and the train starts automtically with fatal consequences. CJB. People don't have any reason to be there though. Where they are used on the Underground, there could usually be end doors immediately adjacent*, around which someone might have an accident. |
DLR Train Captain Texting Whilst 'Driving'
On Wed, 2 Dec 2009 10:38:04 -0800 (PST), MIG
wrote: But it seems that if the key comes out, the door reverts to being a normal door and closes, and the train takes off without further prompt. That seems somewhat of a dangerous[1] design flaw. Arguably, if the key is removed the unit should remain in the state it was in (one door open) until it is reinserted and the member of staff tells it what to do next. A command to depart should be active, not passive. [1] Let's say the member of staff does get themselves locked out - but in doing so gets their coat caught in the door. The train then takes off for the next station, whacking the member of staff against the wall if a passenger hasn't noticed in time. Neil -- Neil Williams Put my first name before the at to reply. |
All times are GMT. The time now is 01:52 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk