Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
The effects of a road congestion tax
"J. Chisholm" wrote in message ... Oliver Keating wrote: Those people who still think we should 'invest' in roads rather than 'subsidies' public transport should be aware that at least in Urban Areas every pound invested in Public Transport reduces car congestion more than the same money invested in building new roads. How much reduction in congestion did the one Billion Pounds spent on the roads from the M11 into London save? The increase in ability to move people quickly and safely with Public Transport, is huge compared with demolishing houses and concreting green spaces as required for roads. Create better quicker public transport and many will desert their cars leaving much more space for the Jeremy Clarksons of this world We have to be careful about investment in public transport too. It is not on unshakable environmental grounds. Many people assume that a journey by public transport reprents a car off the road. But this is hardly ever true, only about 10% of people would have used their car if the public transport service was unavailable. I suspect, in the long term, that would actually be 0%. If there were no East Coast Mainline, how many people living in Peterborough would be driving into London for work? Because they can do it on the train in 45 minutes, Peterborough is a commuter town, despite being 75 miles out of London. This is not environmentally beneficial. Public transport does need investment, but it should mainly come from fares, rather than public money. Have you been reading: http://www.geog.ucl.ac.uk/~jadams/PD...ityforRSA.pdf? I am not convinced by some of the doomsday vision being put foreward by some of these people (there are many people concerned about hypermobility). I do think that transport infrastructure should be allowed to grow, but I think a lot of growth in transport could be done by making things a lot more efficient eg supermarkets using *local* suppliers etc. This sort of thing reduces transport demand without any adverse economic effects. I agree that we shouldn't do things to encourage more and longer trips, but isn't that just what we've done for private cars? FREE roads paid out of general taxation, and cheap petrol obtained by beating up poor and vulnerable countries? But road travel geniunely isn't free. Fuel duty and VAT form 85% of the cost of petrol and diesel, and there is also VED. Now in terms of money spend on roads v money recieved in taxes from the motorist, the motorist is definately *net* taxed, not subsidised. Whether this is still true if you include the external costs of motoring (accidents, noise, congestion, pollution) is a subject of hot debate - as you can see motorists could argue for exmaple, that they already "pay" for congestion as they are the ones who have to sit in it! Since doing some stats on trips on Great Western Main line into London from Reading in early 1970's I've felt we've made commuting fares too cheap. Then an 'annual' season ticket gave a daily rate(assuming 220 tpa) cheaper than a cheap day return. Perhaps what we need to do is ensure car trips pay true cost? The problem is that fuel duty is an incredibly crude lever, because the "true cost" of your journey depends strongly on time of day and location, only a satellite based congestion charging system could account for this. Jim Chisholm (who cycles, drives and travels by train about 3k miles by each mode each year, and hasn't polluted the sky for years. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
LU strike and possible knock-on effects on NR / LO services [was:Tube strike] | London Transport | |||
Road Hog Road Tax Cartoon. | London Transport | |||
'Mares promise to Tax School run Mums | London Transport | |||
New Tax Discs | London Transport | |||
Big car owners face tax hike | London Transport |