Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
David Cantrell wrote:
On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 02:52:01PM -0000, Basil Jet wrote: David Cantrell wrote: And there's nothing "shifty" about minicab drivers. Not, at least, if you use a minicab instead of a random stranger touting for business on the street illegally. If a minicab driver rips you off on your Oyster card, well, you and TfL will know who it was, or at least which company it was, and they'll be strongly incentivised not to do that. Like the way Lewis Day Minicabs were strongly incentivised not to swindle quarter of a million quid out of the NHS? It would, obviously, rely on people bothering to complain, and having a personal incentive to chase TfL if they don't sort it out pronto. And in any case, Lewis Day did get caught, and didn't they have to pay the money back, with interest? How would that disincentivise them from trying it again? No-one's been prosecuted AFAIK. Lewis Day still have the NHS contract and are still TfL-approved. The man responsible is now at another TfL-approved minicab company. The NHS managers who awarded the contract to Lewis Day and then told the whistleblower to take no notice of the 250k gone AWOL still have their jobs and pensions AFAIK. I have a suspicion that the major motive behind minicab licensing was to facilitate corruption by public service managers. If an NHS manager is paying double the going rate for beds or biros, it sticks out like a sore thumb on the balance sheets, but "taxi" contracts for unmetered vehicles can be awarded for way above the going rate without it being noticeable unless you study a map. After all, metered fares in taxis were introduced because the potential for exploiting taxi customers who are in an unfamiliar area was so much greater than the potential for exploiting mars bar customers or shoe customers, so the corruption potential of allowing non-metered vehicles to perform "taxi" services under contracts awarded by public service managers is obvious. One of the non-existant journeys in the Lewis Day scam was 105 pounds for 21 miles in the daytime (Hammersmith Hospital to Gerrards Cross), which is nearly twice what a ride in a hailed £33,000 taxi would cost - this would be robbery of the taxpayers even if the journey had been performed. When Labour brags about how much they have spent on the NHS, they know that much of that money is going straight into manager's pockets, tax-free, all of whom will vote Labour. -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bicycle insurance | London Transport | |||
Insurance – Auto, Life, Home Owner, Health – State Farm | London Transport | |||
Car Insurance a Small Step to Get a Big Service | London Transport | |||
LU multiple-aspect signalling | London Transport | |||
Multiple Buses | London Transport |