| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
What is the 969 bus for?
Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969.
Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
What is the 969 bus for?
On 04/03/2010 18:17, Arthur Figgis wrote:
Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969. Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? It's one of the handful of remaining "Mobility Bus" routes, which have now been mostly phased out following the introduction of "low floor" buses on most routes. According to Wikipedia[1] the remaining eight routes a 917 - Park Hill Rise to Croydon (WO) 931 - Crystal Palace to Lewisham (FO) 941 - Bedfont Green to Hampton Hill (WO) 953 - Scrattons Farm to Chase Cross (WO) 958 - Woodford to Ilford (TO) 965 - Riverhill to Kingston (MFO) 969 - Whitton to Roehampton Vale (TFO) 972 - Neasden to Colindale (ThO) HTH, Barry [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_bus_routes_in_London |
What is the 969 bus for?
On 04/03/2010 18:39, Barry Salter wrote:
On 04/03/2010 18:17, Arthur Figgis wrote: Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969. Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? It's one of the handful of remaining "Mobility Bus" routes, which have now been mostly phased out following the introduction of "low floor" buses on most routes. So is there a specific need for wheelchairs (is that what it in effect means?) to use that route on those days? -- Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK |
What is the 969 bus for?
In message , Arthur
Figgis writes Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? As said by Barry, it is a remnant of the mobility bus network. FWIW, it passes the end of my road on its infrequent visits, and I don't think I've ever seen anybody on board. I think I might sound like Margaret Thatcher on the Chelsea-Hackney line if I asked why anyone from Whitton should ever want to go to Asda in Putney Vale. -- Paul Terry |
What is the 969 bus for?
"Barry Salter" wrote in message ... On 04/03/2010 18:17, Arthur Figgis wrote: Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969. Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? It's one of the handful of remaining "Mobility Bus" routes, which have now been mostly phased out following the introduction of "low floor" buses on most routes. According to Wikipedia[1] the remaining eight routes a 917 - Park Hill Rise to Croydon (WO) 931 - Crystal Palace to Lewisham (FO) 941 - Bedfont Green to Hampton Hill (WO) 953 - Scrattons Farm to Chase Cross (WO) 958 - Woodford to Ilford (TO) 965 - Riverhill to Kingston (MFO) 969 - Whitton to Roehampton Vale (TFO) 972 - Neasden to Colindale (ThO) I don't really see the point of these routes - surely the Dial-A-Ride service would cover these journeys and would be a lot more flexible. Peter Smyth |
What is the 969 bus for?
|
What is the 969 bus for?
Jim wrote:
It passes one location in Arran Drive where the mobility-impaired are likely to use it, and is hail-and-ride in this area, also a small area in Woodford. A hail-and-ride mobility bus! How would wheelchairs access the bus in a road full of parked cars? -- We are the Strasbourg. Referendum is futile. |
What is the 969 bus for?
On Mar 4, 10:11*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:17:38 +0000, Arthur Figgis wrote: Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969. Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. It's a mobility bus route along with a small number of other such routes. Facebook will just be a whingeing brigade. If they shout too loudly the route will go completely. The mobility bus network has been progressively reduced over the years as low floor vehicles have been purchased for the main routes. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? I think the basic argument is that the remaining routes do provide unique network links to town centres or stores from locations where there are numbers of older / mobility impaired people who would struggle with a conventional bus route or where there is simply not the demand for a regular route. *I suspect that the people for whom these routes run do not qualify for dial a ride so it is very much a niche market. I recall seeing an article about the 953 where the users said they very much appreciated the service and, of course, wanted it to be more frequent. They'll be doing well to retain it. The performance of Dial a Ride is the subject of repeated questions from London Assembly Members. There have been widespread complaints about poor booking procedures and declining service for months and months. I doubt anyone wants to add to the burden of trying to get it running properly. In a fantasy version of TfL's bus network (London Bus Game) that I take part in all of these routes have been turned into "Community Connect" routes which offer an hourly or two hourly frequency on M-S using small vehicles. *Naturally in a fantasy world the financial strictures are not as bad as the real world! "London Bus Game" - like SimCity, albeit SimBusNetwork. Wow, there's always something else out there to surprise one! Nice to see the Figgis campaign for the N213 carries on. I think people need to appreciate that if TfL are happy to cut buses left, right and centre on Oxford Street and break a number of network links in so doing then there won't be much compunction about Mobility Buses disappearing when the need for more savings arises. *Oh and I don't see the N213 ever returning. Is (the real world) Mr Figgis is actually involved in the real world campaign? (I dare say it was meant as a figure of speech, but one never knows.) |
What is the 969 bus for?
Basil Jet wrote on 04 March
2010 22:21:27 ... Jim wrote: It passes one location in Arran Drive where the mobility-impaired are likely to use it, and is hail-and-ride in this area, also a small area in Woodford. A hail-and-ride mobility bus! How would wheelchairs access the bus in a road full of parked cars? Not much chance of that situation arising in Arran Drive, based on what Google Street View shows. -- Richard J. (to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address) |
What is the 969 bus for?
On Mar 4, 11:24*pm, Mizter T wrote:
On Mar 4, 10:11*pm, Paul Corfield wrote: On Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:17:38 +0000, Arthur Figgis wrote: Waiting at a bus stop a while ago, I noticed the timetable for the 969.. Whitton - Roehampton, Tuesdays and Fridays only, one journey. Why? It even has a Facebook group commenting on its infrequency. It's a mobility bus route along with a small number of other such routes. Facebook will just be a whingeing brigade. If they shout too loudly the route will go completely. The mobility bus network has been progressively reduced over the years as low floor vehicles have been purchased for the main routes. Given the absence of such strategically vital bus links as the N213, presumably there is a really good reason for the 969 to exist - but what is it? I think the basic argument is that the remaining routes do provide unique network links to town centres or stores from locations where there are numbers of older / mobility impaired people who would struggle with a conventional bus route or where there is simply not the demand for a regular route. *I suspect that the people for whom these routes run do not qualify for dial a ride so it is very much a niche market. I recall seeing an article about the 953 where the users said they very much appreciated the service and, of course, wanted it to be more frequent. They'll be doing well to retain it. The performance of Dial a Ride is the subject of repeated questions from London Assembly Members. There have been widespread complaints about poor booking procedures and declining service for months and months. I doubt anyone wants to add to the burden of trying to get it running properly. In a fantasy version of TfL's bus network (London Bus Game) that I take part in all of these routes have been turned into "Community Connect" routes which offer an hourly or two hourly frequency on M-S using small vehicles. *Naturally in a fantasy world the financial strictures are not as bad as the real world! "London Bus Game" - like SimCity, albeit SimBusNetwork. Wow, there's always something else out there to surprise one! Well yes but it has run for many years in differing forms. There have been some very interesting route and vehicle developments during the various rounds. My "company" has done pretty well in terms of tender successes. Nice to see the Figgis campaign for the N213 carries on. I think people need to appreciate that if TfL are happy to cut buses left, right and centre on Oxford Street and break a number of network links in so doing then there won't be much compunction about Mobility Buses disappearing when the need for more savings arises. *Oh and I don't see the N213 ever returning. Is (the real world) Mr Figgis is actually involved in the real world campaign? (I dare say it was meant as a figure of speech, but one never knows.) I don't know if he was involved in the Facebook campaign that sprang up but he was certainly very vocal about the withdrawal of the night service in to Croydon and has continued to mention the loss of the route at regular intervals. -- Paul C via Google |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:09 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk