Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
2009 stock **** poor interior design
"Paul Corfield" wrote in message
On Mon, 19 Apr 2010 20:40:34 +0100, "Nicola Redwood" wrote: The seats are really uncomfortable too And this is the biggest problem. Being a "fat lump" the seats are too narrow but fundamentally they are also just horrible to sit on. Sure some of the 67 stock seat covers are a long way past their sell by date but at least there is some give or spring in the seats themselves. Whoever decided we should be given moquette covered planks to sit on needs to spend 12 hours riding back and forth on the 2009 stock. I wonder if they'd be able to walk afterwards. Do you know if the new S Stock has similar hard seats? That may be more of a problem given that District and Met line pax tend to have much longer journeys than on the Victoria line. I think the current D stock seats are quite comfortable, though the springy A stock seats give me backache -- perhaps the new S stock will be worse than both. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
LUL New Stock design | London Transport | |||
2009 stock | London Transport | |||
Looking for tube train interior plan | London Transport | |||
Interior of Tube / Trains | London Transport |