Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 14/05/2010 08:55, peter wrote:
I travelled on one today, and was not impressed. The good points - bright lighting, smoother ride, more standing space But the downside of the last point is less seating space. The seating follows the current fashion of being all sideways, which personally I detest. Crabs evolved to travel sideways, humans go forwards. Another drawback is that is much harder to see out of the window. Now I know that isn't an issue on the Victoria Line, which is all underground, but on other lines which do have surface sections it adds to the frustrations of travel. The seats themselves seem to have been designed for midgets, with inadequate depth for an average sized adult male and very thin upholstery. Some tube journeys can be quite long - I have a regular trip between Totteridge and Whetstone and South Wimbledon which takes one hour ten minutes, and I wish transport chiefs would pay a little more attention to the comfort of such passengers rather than basing the designs on the needs of short distance commuters only. Peter Noticed signs announcing their arrival at various tube stations today, but I could not quite make out the schedule on which they will introduce them into revenue service. Did they say every two weeks a new stretch will enter service? Also, when will saw farewell to the 67 stock and what is their fate to be? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
2009 stock | London Transport | |||
2009 Stock loading gauge | London Transport | |||
Victoria line 2009 stock customer feedback | London Transport | |||
2009 stock | London Transport |