Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/07/2010 19:39, D7666 wrote:
It has always been my understanding 1972 stock remained so long in the persistent rumours frame because LU had a surplus of these, even after several were transferred to the Vic line, that were in store, reluctant to part with them, so were the obvious target of rumour and speculation. Fleet replacement of 1972 and 1973 stock looks like receding into the distance - Picc line new stock is rumoured almost certainly to get put back along with resignalling to at least 2020 if not further, and one would suggest Picc is higher priority than Bakerloo so the later is not likely to leapfrog by default. 1967 stock has been so battered with intensive ATO running of ~45 years by the time it could be released in fleet quantity one could speculate it might not be in a fit state for anything. I've said it before I'll say it again. The true IOW solution is new stock. Not new heavy weight trains or new tube stock, but some kind of light rail / heavy tram device. If this is affordable for Watford St.Albans it is affordable for IOW ((+)). Perhaps similar to the newer equipment on the Yellow Train, in France, which can run on third rail? http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier ![]() http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:SNCF_Z_150.jpg Cue howls of derision from this forum. But we must look outside past practice. Old tube trains might have worked. Don't forget by 2020 all the disabled access regs are in place. Old tube stock won't meet those and will be exceedingly hard to make comply. So not only might there not be any tube stock availabale in less than 10 12 or even 15 years, it might be useless anyway. I wonder, however, if they would not continue to operating equipment on the Isle of Wight as they do on the Isle of Man? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 12:24*pm, "
wrote: I wonder, however, if they would not continue to operating equipment on the Isle of Wight as they do on the Isle of Man? Well maybe this is the way to go ... just continue . -- Nick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 11 Jul 2010 04:38:30 -0700 (PDT), D7666
wrote: On Jul 11, 12:24*pm, " wrote: I wonder, however, if they would not continue to operating equipment on the Isle of Wight as they do on the Isle of Man? Well maybe this is the way to go ... just continue . You can only do that if you have a generous benefactor who will pay for the periodic overhaul and refurbishment of vintage rolling stock, and a team of volunteers who will do some of it for nothing. The Isle of Man Government is prepared to fund this activity in the name of encouraging tourism, because the two Isle of Man railways are a major draw for tourists. However, the Island Line is not so much of a draw. I doubt there is much money available in the Isle of Wight Council's budget for what is seen as part of former British Rail; the money is more likely to support bus operations that service many more people than the railway. Any volunteers are more likely to want to work for free on the steam railway. So, all in all, I don't think a valid comparison can be made with the Isle of Man. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport |