Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Which stock was used on the Hainault-Woodford ATO shuttles, when the
rest of the line used 62 stock. -- Clive |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 July, 16:23, Clive wrote:
Which stock was used on the Hainault-Woodford ATO shuttles, when the rest of the line used 62 stock. -- Clive For two or three decades it was four-car units consisting of 1960 stock driving motors and two converted "standard stock" trailers. Later, the standard stock trailers were replaced by a single 1938 stock trailer. Also, at any given time, one unit of 1967 stock would be allocated to Hainault for running on the shuttle. It wouldn't always be the same unit, but would always be one of the later batch, ie xx63 to xx79 if I remember rightly. The latter is inferred purely from observation. In many years, I never saw one of the main batch of 1967 stock on the Central. If anyone knows of some minor differences that could explain why (or could provide counterevidence) ... And it wasn't purely a shuttle even then. Several peak workings of 1962 stock ran to or from Grange Hill via Woodford, which meant that, in the days of A and D coupling, the 1962 stock had to be kept separate in Hainault depot, depending on which end it arrived from. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 July, 17:16, MIG wrote:
On 12 July, 16:23, Clive wrote: Which stock was used on the Hainault-Woodford ATO shuttles, when the rest of the line used 62 stock. -- Clive For two or three decades it was four-car units consisting of 1960 stock driving motors and two converted "standard stock" trailers. Later, the standard stock trailers were replaced by a single 1938 stock trailer. Also, at any given time, one unit of 1967 stock would be allocated to Hainault for running on the shuttle. *It wouldn't always be the same unit, but would always be one of the later batch, ie xx63 to xx79 if I remember rightly. The latter is inferred purely from observation. *In many years, I never saw one of the main batch of 1967 stock on the Central. *If anyone knows of some minor differences that could explain why (or could provide counterevidence) ... And it wasn't purely a shuttle even then. *Several peak workings of 1962 stock ran to or from Grange Hill via Woodford, which meant that, in the days of A and D coupling, the 1962 stock had to be kept separate in Hainault depot, depending on which end it arrived from. There was indeed 1967 stock in use for trials, and they also trialled the experimental (ETT) set of 1973 stock (three-car), according to the pics in Motive Power Recognition back in the 1980s. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15 July, 15:30, "Dr. Sunil" wrote:
On 12 July, 17:16, MIG wrote: On 12 July, 16:23, Clive wrote: Which stock was used on the Hainault-Woodford ATO shuttles, when the rest of the line used 62 stock. -- Clive For two or three decades it was four-car units consisting of 1960 stock driving motors and two converted "standard stock" trailers. Later, the standard stock trailers were replaced by a single 1938 stock trailer. Also, at any given time, one unit of 1967 stock would be allocated to Hainault for running on the shuttle. *It wouldn't always be the same unit, but would always be one of the later batch, ie xx63 to xx79 if I remember rightly. The latter is inferred purely from observation. *In many years, I never saw one of the main batch of 1967 stock on the Central. *If anyone knows of some minor differences that could explain why (or could provide counterevidence) ... And it wasn't purely a shuttle even then. *Several peak workings of 1962 stock ran to or from Grange Hill via Woodford, which meant that, in the days of A and D coupling, the 1962 stock had to be kept separate in Hainault depot, depending on which end it arrived from. There was indeed 1967 stock in use for trials, and they also trialled the experimental (ETT) set of 1973 stock (three-car), according to the pics in Motive Power Recognition back in the 1980s. I don't remember seeing that, but the 1967 stock was in regular service, not just for trials. What I didn't know till I saw a video was that the 1960/1938 unit(s) ended up doing the Ongar before it closed. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message
, MIG writes What I didn't know till I saw a video was that the 1960/1938 unit(s) ended up doing the Ongar before it closed. Epping to Ongar was a normal 62 stock single four car unit in the late sixties, both of the intermediate stations were still open. I believe that a single unit was used because the line was single end feed from Epping and a dual unit eight car train would have caused too great a voltage drop at Ongar. -- Clive |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Clive
writes Epping to Ongar was a normal 62 stock single four car unit in the late sixties, both of the intermediate stations were still open. I believe that a single unit was used because the line was single end feed from Epping and a dual unit eight car train would have caused too great a voltage drop at Ongar. I think that was the normal pattern, but I believe two such units were used for the peak service (and for the North Weald air show) until about 1975. However, ISTR that when two units were in service there were special regulations about them not starting out together from the crossing point at North Weald, because of the voltage drop you mention. -- Paul Terry |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why isn't the 2009 stock walk through like the S stock? | London Transport | |||
TfL / NLL / Metronet surface stock / tube stock / Croxley link | London Transport | |||
Which bus-stop is best? Which is worst? | London Transport | |||
1938 Stock on Uxbridge 100 and T Stock? | London Transport | |||
Enfield to Putney - which route? | London Transport |