London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #71   Report Post  
Old August 5th 10, 09:51 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2009
Posts: 30
Default Crossrail rolling stock PIN

On Aug 5, 8:03*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:
"bob" wrote in message

...

If we are serious about making the change, the place to start is to
build or modify some UK loading gauge stock with retractable steps
that can be used to bridge the gap to UIC platforms (in the way
Eurostar does). *Once all trains on a particular route have such
stock, platforms can be modified. *Once all platforms are done, proper
UIC stock can be brought in, and the step equipped stock can be
cascaded to another route to be converted.


This is just after you've rebuilt every overbridge, underbridge, tunnel,
viaduct and repositioned every other conflicting lineside structure on the
route.


The difference in height between the classic BR loading gauge and UIC
is about 30 cm at the top. Gauge enhancements to expand the loading
gauge from 8' 6" to 9' 6" containers involves lowering the track or
raising structures by about, oh, 30 cm. Because most railway
structures have an arched profile, while the problem with containers
is the top corners, you end up with a lot of spare space in the centre
once you've provided for the top corners. Given that the WCML and NLL
are both already rebuilt for 9' 6" containers, if they had the bottom
part of the loading gauge expanded to UIC width, there would likely
only be a minor amount of work left to achieve UIC clearance for such
routes.

Even if you don't get the full UIC gauge at the top, a lot of single
deck european stock does not take up the full height of the loading
gauge, and so would be able to fit anyway. By eliminating the need to
produce specialist UK only rolling stock, but instead buying proven
off the shelf euro-designs money could be saved and reliability
increased (because somebody else will have worked out the bugs).

Additionally, one of the key reasons why double deck stock does not
offer significant capacity enhancements in the current UK loading
gauge is that low level downstairs saloons have to be significantly
narrower than current single deck carriages. By allowing full width
down to track level, even if it isn't a standard euro-design, double
deck stock would become possible, bringing with it the prospect of
capacity enhancements.

Robin

  #72   Report Post  
Old August 7th 10, 12:18 PM posted to uk.railway,uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 523
Default Crossrail rolling stock PIN

In message
, bob
writes
The
trouble is, it's far harder to rebuild a national railway network than
it is to replace your betamax video collection with VHS.

A case in point, the colour system used in the states, "Never Twice the
Same Color" as opposed to our "Picture Always Lousy".
--
Clive



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Crossrail Rolling Stock [email protected] London Transport 34 November 29th 15 11:14 PM
Chip and PIN on underground? Steve London Transport 3 September 3rd 05 11:01 PM
Rolling stock losses in the bombs Colin Rosenstiel London Transport 0 July 12th 05 12:46 AM
LUL rolling stock question Julian Hayward London Transport 2 October 23rd 04 12:09 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017