Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 28, 9:25*pm, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 12:57:13 on Sun, 28 Nov 2010, TimB remarked: The IEP can solve the white space issue on the ECML fast tracks (ie the ex Cambridge Cruisers), but there's also the stoppers - who can live in their own space on the slow tracks and flow through Thameslink rather than terminating at Kings Cross. Except that there are no slow lines for a few miles north of Welwyn. There are a certain number of paths through Welwyn, increasing the top speed of 2tph from 100mph to 125mph isn't going to change that. What's the track speed there, anyway? 105 through the tunnels - the turnouts to/from the slows are 70, which may be more relevant. Thanks - so having 125mph trains on the Cambridge slows isn't going to help the throughput; even if they touch 105mph for half a mile they'll need to be slowing to 70 almost immediately. -- Roland Perry The hourly Cambridge slows (and an hourly Peterborough) stop at Welwyn North anyway. The ones you're talking of putting on the slow lines are the semi-fasts, non-stop Finsbury Park to Stevenage. But I do sometimes wonder if getting the 365s passed for 105 instead of 100 would make any difference! Tim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thameslink project (i.e. TL2K) gets legal & planning go-ahead | London Transport | |||
Network Rail asks for extra money to fund Thameslink Programme | London Transport News | |||
Thameslink Programme | London Transport | |||
"Mind the Gap" - Radio programme | London Transport |