Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 1, 2:46*pm, wrote:
On Wed, 01 Dec 2010 08:23:36 -0600 wrote: In article , (Roy Badami) wrote: In article , Paul Scott wrote: Underfloor engines on bi-mode IEP have been getting mentioned in most rail mags for a few months, but last week's announcement by Hammond that they were definitely one of two options for off the wires running was the first formal mention, I think. Hmm, I though the original statement I read just talked about "a modified IEP" or some such as one of the option - no technical details that I recall. *Have more details been released since that statement, then? It's sufficiently modified for Bombardier to cry "foul" over the procurement process, apparently. Can someone explaimn the fuss about bimodes? The french have had them for a while and they seem to work ok. http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/B_82500 B2003 As I keep saying - but I think only at 160km/h and in a bigger body. Still, should be relatively easy to adapt. Tim |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Thameslink project (i.e. TL2K) gets legal & planning go-ahead | London Transport | |||
Network Rail asks for extra money to fund Thameslink Programme | London Transport News | |||
Thameslink Programme | London Transport | |||
"Mind the Gap" - Radio programme | London Transport |