Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jan 7, 11:12*pm, eastender wrote:
Am I missing something in the storm today over the £58m of so that Oyster users are 'overcharged'? I can't see anything saying what the default position should be for people who fail to touch out. There's not been any barriers on most of the DLR in any case. E. I think it's the wrong scandal, as usual, given that it is usually possible to avoid, with a bit of alertness. No focus on all the people who are charged when they do touch in and out correctly, but hit timeout issues. No focus on the outrageous cash fares, which might as well be called penalty fares for using cash, and are at the same rates. No focus on the reduced accessibility, delays and overcrowding resulting from the way that people are channelled in order to be able to touch in and out. (Down my way, examples are closing the useful exit at Brockley, forcing people to queue to walk up stairs and jam into a narrow bridge, and not installing a reader at one of the most popular exits at Lewisham, forcing people to jam dangerously into a cramped area at the other end of a subway where barriers have been shoehorned in.) Not enough focus on the hiking and withdrawal of caps, putting up fares by over 70% for some people (although it was raised a while back). |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"MIG" wrote in message
On Jan 7, 11:12 pm, eastender wrote: Am I missing something in the storm today over the £58m of so that Oyster users are 'overcharged'? I can't see anything saying what the default position should be for people who fail to touch out. There's not been any barriers on most of the DLR in any case. E. I think it's the wrong scandal, as usual, given that it is usually possible to avoid, with a bit of alertness. No focus on all the people who are charged when they do touch in and out correctly, but hit timeout issues. I had a case recently where there was a signal failure on the route home, which severely delayed numerous trains (at least a dozen) on the Picc and District. They eventually got the trains moving again, and I got to my home station over an hour later than I'd have expected. I touched out correctly, and guessing that I'd have been timed out, I went to the ticket machine and confirmed that I had indeed been charged 2x£4.30 for the journey, rather than the £2.40 it should have been. I suspect most other pax wouldn't have thought to do this. I went straight to the ticket office, which had someone in it, who instantly agreed that I was due a full refund, but said he couldn't do it immediately as the office was officially closed by then. I hoped the system would automatically cancel the overcharge (after all, it had all the data to do so), but of course it didn't. I couldn't find a direct way of reporting this on the TfL Web site, so used the complaint option. A couple of days later I got an apology email, but no refund. I eventually found an open ticket office without a long queue, and after some discussion, persuaded the lady that I was due a refund. After lots of button pushing, she managed to get one of the overcharges refunded. I then tried the Oyster helpline, which was distinctly unhelpful. Only when I reminded the operator that the call was probably being recorded did he suddenly decide to offer the refund I was owed. It still took a long discussion with his supervisor to sort it out. I was only so persistent because I was peeved -- the relatively trivial amount of money involved certainly didn't warrant so much effort -- and I suspect that very few of the others affected that night would have even bothered to try. So the net effect is that TfL probably netted several thousand pounds of Oyster penalty fares that evening, thanks to its unreliable signalling and inability to get the trains moving again quickly. So what's the incentive for TfL to fix its wonky systems, given that it would lose money by doing so? |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:47:36AM -0000, Recliner wrote:
I had a case recently where there was a signal failure on the route home, which severely delayed numerous trains (at least a dozen) on the Picc and District. They eventually got the trains moving again, and I got to my home station over an hour later than I'd have expected. I touched out correctly, and guessing that I'd have been timed out, I went to the ticket machine and confirmed that I had indeed been charged 2x£4.30 for the journey, rather than the £2.40 it should have been. I suspect most other pax wouldn't have thought to do this. I went straight to the ticket office, which had someone in it, who instantly agreed that I was due a full refund, but said he couldn't do it immediately as the office was officially closed by then. And of course if you were at a National Rail station there's nothing that could have been done anyway, because Oyster still isn't properly implemented there, so you'd have to either use TfL's premium rate phone line or maybe make a pointless journey (at your own expense) to a TfL station. And people wonder why I still don't use Oyster. -- David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age Sobol's Law of Telecom Utilities: Telcos are malicious; cablecos are simply clueless. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"David Cantrell" wrote in message
k On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 11:47:36AM -0000, Recliner wrote: I had a case recently where there was a signal failure on the route home, which severely delayed numerous trains (at least a dozen) on the Picc and District. They eventually got the trains moving again, and I got to my home station over an hour later than I'd have expected. I touched out correctly, and guessing that I'd have been timed out, I went to the ticket machine and confirmed that I had indeed been charged 2x£4.30 for the journey, rather than the £2.40 it should have been. I suspect most other pax wouldn't have thought to do this. I went straight to the ticket office, which had someone in it, who instantly agreed that I was due a full refund, but said he couldn't do it immediately as the office was officially closed by then. And of course if you were at a National Rail station there's nothing that could have been done anyway, because Oyster still isn't properly implemented there, so you'd have to either use TfL's premium rate phone line or maybe make a pointless journey (at your own expense) to a TfL station. And as I went on to point out, the helpline was less than helpful, and visiting another TfL ticket office only got me half the refund owed. They really do go out of their way to make it difficult to get back the excess charges they've helped themselves to. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Why touch in at interchanges? | London Transport | |||
Always touch out | London Transport | |||
Death Touch Secrets Revealed... | London Transport | |||
Where do you "touch in" at DLR Blackwall? | London Transport | |||
Looking To Get In Touch With Karl Petersen | London Transport |