In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

--
Clive D.W. Feather | Home:
Mobile: +44 7973 377646 | Web: http://www.davros.org
Please reply to the Reply-To address, which is:

In article , (Clive D.
W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 2011-08-13,
wrote:
In article ,
(Richard J.) wrote:

wrote on 13 August 2011 18:06:42 ...
In ,
lid (Roger) wrote:

On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 05:26:34 -0500,
wrote:

In ,
(Robin9) wrote:

trip in 1970.

Colin Rosenstiel
Robin9

Is there something wrong with your newsreader? This is all I can see
of yourpost.

If you can't see the four-and-a-half line paragraph that Robin9
wrote doesn't that mean there is something wrong at your end?

I can see the raw text that reached my newsfeed and what I quoted is
all there is. It seems to be something about Robin's news arrangements
because I've seen the effect before and only with his postings.

Maybe it's some sort of interaction problem between his outgoing
newsfeed and your incoming newsfeed. My news server (Virgin Media)
has received his complete post, as has LondonBanter.co.uk and Google
Groups.

My news comes via Giganews, hardly a two bit outfit. As I said, it's
only Robin's messages.


So does mine and I see the whole message.

Eric

--
ms fnd in a lbry

wrote in message

In article ,
(Clive D. W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

No, I use Giganews too, and see the full messages. The problem would
appear to be at your end.

In article ,
(Recliner) wrote:

wrote in message

In article ,
(Clive D. W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

No, I use Giganews too, and see the full messages. The problem would
appear to be at your end.

Very strange. Can you or Eric copy the whole of his last post including
headers to me by email please and I'll contact my ISP.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

On 2011-08-13, wrote:
In article , (Clive D.
W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?


No, but you do seem to be the only one using Ameol.

Eric

--
ms fnd in a lbry

In article , (Eric) wrote:

On 2011-08-13,
wrote:
In article ,
(Clive D. W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

No, but you do seem to be the only one using Ameol.

Maybe true (I can think of one other possible user here) but I'm looking at
the raw messages which shouldn't be affected by the newsreader. Anyway, why
are Robin's the only Usenet posts in several groups giving me this problem?
That's the mystery.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

wrote in message

In article ,
(Eric) wrote:

On 2011-08-13,
wrote:
In article ,
(Clive D. W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

No, but you do seem to be the only one using Ameol.

Maybe true (I can think of one other possible user here) but I'm
looking at the raw messages which shouldn't be affected by the
newsreader. Anyway, why are Robin's the only Usenet posts in several
groups giving me this problem? That's the mystery.

Here's the full details of the post you first complained about:

Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!usenetcore.com!newsf eed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news .glorb.com!border3.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border1.n ntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp .dca.giganews.com!nntp.newsgroupbanter.com!news.ne wsgroupbanter.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:30:48 -0500
From: Robin9
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Subject: why are the new Victoria and trains so slow?
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:08:18 +0100
Message-ID:
Organization: LondonBanter
User-Agent:
X-Newsreader:
X-Originating-IP: 86.21.85.73
References:

Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-GXrAmc7y//FCoq2O4bHaf0mLeFhyzB7mLQFNtFOg9H5dKqmZsHvWHbQNeuCB F1JtfPw2y+WZMgV65O2!Uwzu07RVCYnsxn2MiDcM7yHTtUP7Uc/mcyW8XPfqd0kby9s4xec7QkXDYuh7mvn+uhbmdutO1fEy!CtS5 BCrK
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Lines: 4
X-Original-Bytes: 1810
Bytes: 2124

;121904 Wrote:
Did anyone else here ever stand on the platform at Essex Road in
Northern City Line days? The platform lights were fed from the
traction
supply so dimmed sharply when a train started away. Of course the
platform was empty at that point as the passengers had all got on the
departing train but we were changing directions there on the
Underground
trip in 1970.

Colin Rosenstiel
I did occasionally use Essex Road Station in those days. I didn't pay
attention to esoteric details such as lights dimming but I do remember
vividly that the entire line seemed dingy and run down and that all the
stations had poor lighting. The line was definitely the poor relation of
the London Underground family.




--
Robin9

In article ,
(Recliner) wrote:

wrote in message

In article ,
(Eric) wrote:

On 2011-08-13,
wrote:
In article ,
(Clive D. W. Feather) wrote:

In message ,
wrote:
[...]
Same problem again. Not a lot there!

You seem to be the only one experiencing it.

Am I the only one here using Giganews?

No, but you do seem to be the only one using Ameol.

Maybe true (I can think of one other possible user here) but I'm
looking at the raw messages which shouldn't be affected by the
newsreader. Anyway, why are Robin's the only Usenet posts in several
groups giving me this problem? That's the mystery.

Here's the full details of the post you first complained about:

Path:
border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!usenetcore.com!newsf eed.xs4all.nl!newsfe
ed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!news.glorb.com!border3.n ntp.dca.giganews.com
!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!l ocal2.nntp.dca.gigan
ews.com!nntp.newsgroupbanter.com!news.newsgroupban ter.com.POSTED!not-f
or-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 04:30:48 -0500
From: Robin9
Newsgroups: uk.transport.london
Subject: why are the new Victoria and trains so slow?
Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2011 10:08:18 +0100
Message-ID:
Organization: LondonBanter
User-Agent:
X-Newsreader:
X-Originating-IP: 86.21.85.73
References:

Lines: 20
X-Usenet-Provider: http://www.giganews.com
X-Trace:
sv3-GXrAmc7y//FCoq2O4bHaf0mLeFhyzB7mLQFNtFOg9H5dKqmZsHvWHbQNeuCB F1JtfP
w2y+WZMgV65O2!Uwzu07RVCYnsxn2MiDcM7yHTtUP7Uc/mcyW8XPfqd0kby9s4xec7QkXD
Yuh7mvn+uhbmdutO1fEy!CtS5BCrK
X-Complaints-To:
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your
complaint properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.40
X-Original-Lines: 4
X-Original-Bytes: 1810
Bytes: 2124
Xref: number.nntp.dca.giganews.com uk.transport.london:260980

;121904 Wrote:
Did anyone else here ever stand on the platform at Essex Road in
Northern City Line days? The platform lights were fed from the
traction
supply so dimmed sharply when a train started away. Of course the
platform was empty at that point as the passengers had all got on
the
departing train but we were changing directions there on the
Underground
trip in 1970.

Colin Rosenstiel
I did occasionally use Essex Road Station in those days. I didn't pay
attention to esoteric details such as lights dimming but I do remember
vividly that the entire line seemed dingy and run down and that all
the
stations had poor lighting. The line was definitely the poor relation
of
the London Underground family.




--
Robin9

Thanks. I did in fact see that text in Jim's response to it.

Eric kindly sent me one message as he received it via Giganews. The weird
bit is that the path details are identical for him and me so it's definitely
a problem at my ISP. I'm waiting for a response from them now.

--
Colin Rosenstiel

wrote in message

In article ,
(Recliner) wrote:

Thanks. I did in fact see that text in Jim's response to it.

Eric kindly sent me one message as he received it via Giganews. The
weird bit is that the path details are identical for him and me so
it's definitely a problem at my ISP. I'm waiting for a response from
them now.

I thought it was the headers you were interested in?