Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 12:01:02PM -0500, wrote:
This fashion is more Kensington and Chelsea than all of London but I'm all in favour of getting rid of railings. They are usually a real danger to cyclists. Kerbs are another matter though. Without them motorists drive all over the pavements. We learnt that in Cambridge 20 years ago and ended up with a load of bollards. Railings are a damned inconvenience to pedestrians too. Bollards are fine. -- David Cantrell | http://www.cantrell.org.uk/david It wouldn't hurt to think like a serial killer every so often. Purely for purposes of prevention, of course. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:48:10 -0500
wrote: Bollards are a major problem for people with impaired sight. The County Why? Unless they left their white stick at home or have a particularly stupid guide dog why should bollards be any more of an impediment than anything else potentially in their way? B2003 |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 01:18:03PM +0000, d wrote:
On Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:48:10 -0500 wrote: Bollards are a major problem for people with impaired sight. The County Why? Unless they left their white stick at home or have a particularly stupid guide dog why should bollards be any more of an impediment than anything else potentially in their way? Quite. There's plenty of other street furniture - bus stops, signs, lamp posts, pavement cafes, most of which seem to be in shades of grey and brown designed specifically to be invisible during both daylight and under artificial light - not to mention all those pesky pedestrians moving around and tourists stopping abruptly for no good reason. Bollards can be painted in bright red and white stripes to make them more visible if necessary. Argh! I agreed with Boltar! -- David Cantrell | Official London Perl Mongers Bad Influence Compromise: n: lowering my standards so you can meet them |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 12:03:54 +0100
David Cantrell wrote: Argh! I agreed with Boltar! My masterplan continues apace... [strokes white cat] B2003 |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 07:56:11AM -0500, wrote:
In article , (David Cantrell) wrote: Bollards can be painted in bright red and white stripes to make them more visible if necessary. Unfortunately that's not always an acceptable option in historic cities. Why on earth not? -- David Cantrell | Official London Perl Mongers Bad Influence What profiteth a man, if he win a flame war, yet lose his cool? |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
An exhibition of stupidity
In article ,
(Bruce) wrote: wrote: In article , (Paul Corfield) wrote: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:27:54 +0100, Basil Jet wrote: Exhibition Road has had the pavements and kerbs removed to turn it into a place where pedestrians and vehicles don't quite know who is supposed to be where. Apparently that's a good thing. Anyway, blind groups have complained, so the former pavement area is now going to be covered in ... wait for it... corduroy so that the blind will know when they are on the former pavement area and when they are in the former road area. Since the presence of the corduroy will also alert everyone else to the location of the former pavement area, I can't help thinking that leaving the original road, pavement and kerbs intact would have achieved similar results with zero cost or disruption. No wonder the country's bankrupt. This is just the largest and most ludicrous example of "highway engineering fashion" that has been implemented in London. You only have to experience the smaller scale version on High Street Kensington and nearly be run over about 10 times in a 100 yards to know it is a preposterous idea. I'm also not entirely convinced with the new obsession of removing fencing and street furniture either. In some places you do need to some obstructions if only to protect people from their own stupidity of stepping on the highway when vehicles are driving past. I'd ove to know how many millions of pounds have been spent on this in recent years. It could then be compared with the millions spent under Ken to install it all and all the extra traffic lights. Neither policy has achieved the optimum position and I fear we will forever lurch back and forth between two policy extremes. This fashion is more Kensington and Chelsea than all of London but I'm all in favour of getting rid of railings. They are usually a real danger to cyclists. Kerbs are another matter though. Without them motorists drive all over the pavements. We learnt that in Cambridge 20 years ago and ended up with a load of bollards. Presumably the evil motorists now knock down the bollards. Are the bollards any better for cyclists than railings? As the bollards are in primarily pedestrian areas the rate of demolition isn't too great. It's mostly delivery lorries which others can more easily avoid. -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you want to know the stupidity of the system, consider the 3feet law | London Transport | |||
Undressing Exhibition Road | London Transport | |||
Buses on Exhibition Road | London Transport | |||
Wembley Empire exhibition on BBC2 now | London Transport | |||
Crossrail public exhibition coming in Richmond | London Transport |