London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   London Overground impact study (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/12329-london-overground-impact-study.html)

Paul Scott[_3_] November 15th 11 02:31 PM

London Overground impact study
 
For discussion at tomorrow's rail and underground panel meeting, a report on
passenger numbers, quicker than expected growth, and subsequent overcrowding
issues

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...pact-Study.pdf

Paul S


77002 November 15th 11 05:17 PM

London Overground impact study
 
On Nov 15, 3:31*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:
For discussion at tomorrow's rail and underground panel meeting, a report on
passenger numbers, quicker than expected growth, and subsequent overcrowding
issues

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...-RUP-16-11-201...

In a perverse way this is awfully good news. :-)

Robin[_4_] November 15th 11 06:16 PM

London Overground impact study
 
In a perverse way this is awfully good news. :-)

Not for those of us who have no real alternative but to use it ;)

One nitpicking (and probably idiot-boy) question. What does the report
mean by "160 million passengers have used LO since its opening." I
refuse to believe that 160 million distinct individuals have used it:
London does not get *that* many visitors. Is it 160 million journeys?
Counting a daily commute (out and back) as 2?

--
Robin
reply to address is (meant to be) valid



Bruce[_2_] November 15th 11 06:34 PM

London Overground impact study
 
"Robin" wrote:

In a perverse way this is awfully good news. :-)


Not for those of us who have no real alternative but to use it ;)

One nitpicking (and probably idiot-boy) question. What does the report
mean by "160 million passengers have used LO since its opening." I
refuse to believe that 160 million distinct individuals have used it:
London does not get *that* many visitors.



Is it 160 million journeys?


Yes.

Counting a daily commute (out and back) as 2?


Yes.


77002 November 15th 11 06:51 PM

London Overground impact study
 
On Nov 15, 7:16*pm, "Robin" wrote:
In a perverse way this is awfully good news. *:-)


Not for those of us who have no real alternative but to use it ;)

One nitpicking (and probably idiot-boy) question. *What does the report
mean by "160 million passengers have used LO since its opening." I
refuse to believe that 160 million distinct individuals have used it:
London does not get *that* many visitors. *Is it 160 million journeys?
Counting a daily commute (out and back) as 2?

Yes. Less confusingly in California the terms "boardings" is used.

Charles Ellson November 15th 11 10:04 PM

London Overground impact study
 
On Tue, 15 Nov 2011 10:17:55 -0800 (PST), 77002
wrote:

On Nov 15, 3:31*pm, "Paul Scott"
wrote:
For discussion at tomorrow's rail and underground panel meeting, a report on
passenger numbers, quicker than expected growth, and subsequent overcrowding
issues

http://www.tfl.gov.uk/assets/downloa...-RUP-16-11-201...

In a perverse way this is awfully good news. :-)

It does not say a lot for whoever made the decision some years ago to
replace 6-coach cl.501 units with 3-coach cl.313 units. That went a
long way to driving passengers away from the DC line.


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk