Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 8:37*pm, The Gardener wrote:
On Dec 13, 7:03*pm, Scott wrote: Also good to see that the locals are enthusiastic, unlike the whingers in Edinburgh who are apparently now complaining to the United Nations:http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotlan...-fife-16165656 If they are worried about air pollution, I say build a public transport system that runs on electricity and introduce a congestion charge to discourage use of cars. The problem is that there are always going to be whingers - ISTR a similar mob (although not going so far as to complaining to the UN!) about Croydon Tramlink, who became very silent after it had opened and proved to be a success. On the subject of Watford, I can only agree with those who say "and not before time". This is the sort of project that should be championed: relatively low-cost and largely using disused or under- used heavy rail lines, to optimise their utility. 1948 would have been a good time to start this project, :-), if not sooner. For historical interest, here's a pic of Croxley Green as was: http://www.flickr.com/photos/6053903.../set-721576269... |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
An open letter regarding Croxley Rail link | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link - Position Update October 2007 | London Transport | |||
Croxley Rail Link Petition | London Transport | |||
CROXLEY RAIL LINK - POSITION UPDATE - February 2007 | London Transport | |||
Future is bleak for Croxley Rail Link | London Transport |