Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 19:03:33 on
Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Charles Ellson remarked: Mercury was also mentioned but unlike BT they had nothing in the way of a universal service obligation and served a very small market. I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. -- Roland Perry |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
In message , at 19:03:33 on Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Charles Ellson remarked: Mercury was also mentioned but unlike BT they had nothing in the way of a universal service obligation and served a very small market. I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. I still use a phone that has a blue Mercury button! I was never a Mercury customer, and never worked out how to reprogram the button to do something more useful. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 14:41:13 on
Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Recliner remarked: I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. I still use a phone that has a blue Mercury button! I was never a Mercury customer, and never worked out how to reprogram the button to do something more useful. I think they came programmed to prepend "131", not sure if that can be changed. -- Roland Perry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/01/12 14:52, Roland Perry wrote:
I think they came programmed to prepend "131", not sure if that can be changed. The one I had did 131, pause, PIN. You only entered the PIN and couldn't get rid of the 131, so it was no use for anything else. Ian |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/01/12 14:32, Roland Perry wrote:
I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. The original 131+PIN service was only available to some exchanges, though the number of those increased with time. The later 132 service was, I think, available everywhere. Ian |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 14:32:30 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 19:03:33 on Wed, 4 Jan 2012, Charles Ellson remarked: Mercury was also mentioned but unlike BT they had nothing in the way of a universal service obligation and served a very small market. I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. Mercury was not providing the infrastructure for that service, merely using an established provider to connect the calls to their much smaller network, a bit like Sainsburys being obliged to allow a competitor to set up order desks within its premises. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 17:58:26 on
Fri, 6 Jan 2012, Charles Ellson remarked: Mercury was also mentioned but unlike BT they had nothing in the way of a universal service obligation and served a very small market. I'm not aware that dialling the Mercury Access code was in any way restricted, other than people, wherever they were, signing up for a Mercury subscription. Mercury was not providing the infrastructure for that service, merely using an established provider to connect the calls to their much smaller network, a bit like Sainsburys being obliged to allow a competitor to set up order desks within its premises. It's a bit more complicated than that, because Mercury was, where available, able to use its own infrastructure for backbone and international calling (which was after all C&W's core business). The main thing they were doing was sharing the local loop, and the domestic market was always a bit of a distraction from their offering to businesses. -- Roland Perry |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 06/01/12 17:58, Charles Ellson wrote:
Mercury was not providing the infrastructure for that service, merely using an established provider to connect the calls to their much smaller network, a bit like Sainsburys being obliged to allow a competitor to set up order desks within its premises. I believe that the original Mercury 131 service required Mercury to have lines into BT exchanges. When I signed up in 1992 only some areas of Edinburgh were covered. The later 132 service was much more like things nowadays, and was available from any BT exchange. Ian |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
S Stock in Berlin | London Transport | |||
Why was Waterloo shutdown on Wednesday the 6th, 8:30am? | London Transport | |||
top up wrong Oyster (almost) | London Transport | |||
Northern Line early shutdown on Tuesday 24/02/2004 | London Transport | |||
Brian Hardy talks about Berlin U-Bahn and S-Bahn in St Albans on Thursday | London Transport |