| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
 |
|
Menu
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
| London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
June 13th 12, 04:43 PM
posted to uk.railway,misc.transport.urban-transit,uk.transport.london
|
|||
|
|||
BBC's Dire Coverage of the Thames Flotilla and other Jubillee Events
On Jun 13, 5:13*pm, Anna Noyd-Dryver wrote:
Bruce wrote: As a prime example of this, how can the BBC justify paying £20 million a year of licence payers' money to screen The Voice? *Competing talent shows on channels other than the BBC don't receive a penny from licence payers. Surely you could apply that argument to any programme produced by the BBC? Why bother with soaps, other channels do them. Why bother with quiz shows, breakfast shows, daytime tv? Why bother with news when the other channels have news too? Because by focussing on the areas that the commercial outlets do not broadcast, or do not broadcast well, the BBC can do better for less cost to the Llicence payer. Among my friends who watch it, The Voice seems to be considered better than the competing talent shows; better format, better talent. But the BBC could excel at News, Current Affairs, Commedy, Documentaries Costume Dramas, etc. |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Well I enjoyed it - the Flotilla | London Transport | |||
| BBC's Dire Coverage of the Thames Flotilla and other Jubillee Events | London Transport | |||
| BBC: Thames cable car given go-ahead | London Transport | |||
| Mobile phone coverage on the Waterloo and City line | London Transport | |||
Threaded Mode
