London Banter

London Banter (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/forum.php)
-   London Transport (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/)
-   -   Underground Maps Unravelled (https://www.londonbanter.co.uk/london-transport/13195-underground-maps-unravelled.html)

Basil Jet[_2_] August 15th 12 02:42 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
Maxwell J Roberts, formerly of this parish, has a new-ish book out.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Underground-...pr_product_top

I've only seen the cover in the window of the LT Museum, so can't comment.

Richard J.[_3_] August 17th 12 09:42 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
Basil Jet wrote on 15 August 2012
15:42:03 ...
Maxwell J Roberts, formerly of this parish, has a new-ish book out.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Underground-...pr_product_top

I've only seen the cover in the window of the LT Museum, so can't comment.


If you scroll down to near the bottom of that Amazon web page, there's a
long and enthusiastic review by Douglas Rose of this book, which is, he
says, "not a book about Underground maps - the real messages are far
wider. The sub-title of the book `Explorations in Information Design' is
what it is really about."

Sounds interesting, but 45 is a bit steep.
--
Richard J.
(to email me, swap 'uk' and 'yon' in address)

Basil Jet[_2_] August 17th 12 02:53 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 2012\08\17 10:42, Richard J. wrote:
Basil Jet wrote on 15 August 2012
15:42:03 ...
Maxwell J Roberts, formerly of this parish, has a new-ish book out.

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Underground-...pr_product_top


I've only seen the cover in the window of the LT Museum, so can't
comment.


If you scroll down to near the bottom of that Amazon web page, there's a
long and enthusiastic review by Douglas Rose of this book, which is, he
says, "not a book about Underground maps - the real messages are far
wider. The sub-title of the book `Explorations in Information Design' is
what it is really about."

Sounds interesting, but 45 is a bit steep.



As we approach the point where everyone has a smart-phone, we might
reach the situation where the cost of designing, printing and
distributing the tube-map exceeds its utility, and we might then see the
last tube-map. Regular passengers know that certain system breakdowns
are best dealt with by leaving the system and getting a bus, and there's
just no way that static information design can encapsulate all the
information that you really need to use the tube system.

Any organisation should be embarrassed to be displaying information
which is inferior to what people have on a device in their pocket made
by someone else. Also, the current system of having enamel maps down on
the platforms telling you what tracks have been built, and paper maps on
an easel up in the ticket office telling you what tracks actually have
trains on them today, is a bit of an anachronism.

[email protected] August 20th 12 08:36 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Fri, 17 Aug 2012 15:53:55 +0100
Basil Jet wrote:
As we approach the point where everyone has a smart-phone, we might


Who is "everyone"? I don't, most of my family don't, a lot of my friends
don't. Don't confuse teenagers and hipsters with "everyone".

by someone else. Also, the current system of having enamel maps down on
the platforms telling you what tracks have been built, and paper maps on


Are you trolling? Are you seriously suggesting that having to find a website
or app then starting it up and trying to view it on a tinky winky 4 inch
screen is easier than just looking at a huge metre square map on a wall?
I don't want to be in the position of having to purchase some overpriced
iToy that I don't need just to be able to get basic information in a city.

B2003



Neil Williams August 20th 12 09:59 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
wrote:

Are you trolling? Are you seriously suggesting that having to find a website
or app then starting it up and trying to view it on a tinky winky 4 inch
screen is easier than just looking at a huge metre square map on a wall?
I don't want to be in the position of having to purchase some overpriced
iToy that I don't need just to be able to get basic information in a city.


Perhaps borrow one for a bit. I said a while ago that journey planners
were the best thing that ever happened to public transport. Add a
smartphone, and it truly is a "killer app". Try it before you reject the
idea totally.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply.

[email protected] August 20th 12 10:22 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 20 Aug 2012 09:59:13 GMT
Neil Williams wrote:
Perhaps borrow one for a bit. I said a while ago that journey planners
were the best thing that ever happened to public transport. Add a
smartphone, and it truly is a "killer app". Try it before you reject the
idea totally.


I'm not buying a smartphone just to read a map. Navigating a metro system
is hardly rocket science. A map on a wall is all anyone needs unless they're
terminally stupid and need to be spoon fed even the simplest information.

B2003


PhilD August 20th 12 07:14 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Aug 20, 11:22*am, wrote:
I'm not buying a smartphone just to read a map. Navigating a metro system
is hardly rocket science. A map on a wall is all anyone needs unless they're
terminally stupid and need to be spoon fed even the simplest information.


Boltar

I don't always agree with your sentiments, but in this case I think
you are right. Relatively speaking, it is cheap and easy for maps to
be posted up on the walls in various strategic places (platforms, for
example), where a quick glance "I need to go down there a bit, then
over there a bit" tells the traveller enough.

By all means have a technological solution *as well*, but not
*instead*.

PhilD

--


Arthur Figgis August 21st 12 06:57 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 20/08/2012 20:14, PhilD wrote:
On Aug 20, 11:22 am, wrote:
I'm not buying a smartphone just to read a map. Navigating a metro system
is hardly rocket science. A map on a wall is all anyone needs unless they're
terminally stupid and need to be spoon fed even the simplest information.


Boltar

I don't always agree with your sentiments, but in this case I think
you are right. Relatively speaking, it is cheap and easy for maps to
be posted up on the walls in various strategic places (platforms, for
example), where a quick glance "I need to go down there a bit, then
over there a bit" tells the traveller enough.


That works if there is a turn-up and go service everywhere, or the map
shows details like "runs every half hour", "match days only", "no
service on St Fred's day", etc, and the passenger has a way of finding
out when those things are.

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

[email protected] August 21st 12 08:44 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012 21:40:23 +0100
Paul Corfield wrote:
various GLA members to the cut backs in bus stop Countdown displays.
The official answer was "people can use their phones or PCs". However
a text message for Countdown costs 12p a go which is ridiculous.


Its a bit like the nonsense with phone parking. You can end up paying
almost as much for the phone call as the ticket. Its just another money
making scam and if transport information was only made available online you
can bet that eventually a small "administration" charge would be made
one way or another.

B2003



[email protected] August 21st 12 08:50 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 07:57:59 +0100
Arthur Figgis wrote:
I don't always agree with your sentiments, but in this case I think
you are right. Relatively speaking, it is cheap and easy for maps to
be posted up on the walls in various strategic places (platforms, for
example), where a quick glance "I need to go down there a bit, then
over there a bit" tells the traveller enough.


That works if there is a turn-up and go service everywhere, or the map


Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?

B2003



Neil Williams August 21st 12 09:18 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
wrote:

Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


Merseyrail on a Sunday. The S Bahn Stuttgart.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply.

[email protected] August 21st 12 09:21 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 21 Aug 2012 09:18:26 GMT
Neil Williams wrote:
wrote:

Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


Merseyrail on a Sunday. The S Bahn Stuttgart.


Are you suggesting you have to book in advance to use these systems on a
sunday? Excuse me if I'm not convinced.

B2003



Neil Williams August 21st 12 09:29 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
wrote:

Are you suggesting you have to book in advance to use these systems on a
sunday? Excuse me if I'm not convinced.


No, but I am suggesting that they operate relatively infrequent services on
a half hourly base which unless you have lots of time in your hands
requires the use of a timetable or journey planner, not just a map.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply.

[email protected] August 21st 12 09:47 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 21 Aug 2012 09:29:39 GMT
Neil Williams wrote:
wrote:

Are you suggesting you have to book in advance to use these systems on a
sunday? Excuse me if I'm not convinced.


No, but I am suggesting that they operate relatively infrequent services on
a half hourly base which unless you have lots of time in your hands
requires the use of a timetable or journey planner, not just a map.


A half hourly basis isn't that bad for those systems on a sunday given they're
suburban rail systems and not really metros at all. On average you'll only be
waiting 15 mins.

B2003



Jarle H Knudsen August 21st 12 10:02 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 09:47:48 +0000 (UTC), d wrote:

A half hourly basis isn't that bad for those systems on a sunday given they're
suburban rail systems and not really metros at all. On average you'll only be
waiting 15 mins.


But you would have to plan for a half hour wait.

--
jhk

David Cantrell August 21st 12 10:40 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:36:50AM +0000, d wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
As we approach the point where everyone has a smart-phone, we might

Who is "everyone"? I don't, most of my family don't, a lot of my friends
don't. Don't confuse teenagers and hipsters with "everyone".


The key word "approach" should have told you that we're not there yet.

And this is obviously for values of "everyone" which deliberately
doesn't consider the vanishingly small population of digital refuseniks,
who will be economically and socially irrelevant just like those who
don't have a phone of any kind are.

--
David Cantrell | Cake Smuggler Extraordinaire

[OS X] appeals to me as a monk, a user, a compiler-of-apps, a
sometime coder, and an easily amused primate with a penchant
for those that are pretty, colorful, and make nice noises.
-- Dan Birchall, in The Monastery

[email protected] August 21st 12 10:51 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:40:50 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:36:50AM +0000, d wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
As we approach the point where everyone has a smart-phone, we might

Who is "everyone"? I don't, most of my family don't, a lot of my friends
don't. Don't confuse teenagers and hipsters with "everyone".


The key word "approach" should have told you that we're not there yet.


And what makes you think we will get there? Just because smartphones are
the techno fashion du jour at the moment doesn't mean they will be in
10 years time. Something else will probably have come along by then to part
the drooling sheeple from their money.

And this is obviously for values of "everyone" which deliberately
doesn't consider the vanishingly small population of digital refuseniks,


You seem to be implying that not buying a smartphone is some kind of social
or political statement rather than the simple fact that some of us simply
don't need or want one and therefor don't see any reason to buy one. I don't
have a home surround sound system or the latest core i7 PC for the same
reason - does that also make me a "refusenik" in your eyes?

who will be economically and socially irrelevant just like those who


If you need to have a smartphone to be socially relevant then there's
something seriously wrong with your social life and probably social skills.
Though I imagine for anyone who suffers from aspergers or similar problems
they're a godsend.

B2003


David Cantrell August 21st 12 10:57 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 10:22:39AM +0000, d wrote:
On 20 Aug 2012 09:59:13 GMT
Neil Williams wrote:
Perhaps borrow one for a bit. I said a while ago that journey planners
were the best thing that ever happened to public transport. Add a
smartphone, and it truly is a "killer app". Try it before you reject the
idea totally.

I'm not buying a smartphone just to read a map. Navigating a metro system
is hardly rocket science. A map on a wall is all anyone needs unless they're
terminally stupid and need to be spoon fed even the simplest information.


If you'd actually used a journey planner, you would know that you are
talking about something completely different. A mere map can't include
all the buses, or know how frequent they are, and how frequent all the
trains are, or which lines are open, and so be able to find the best
route for you across all modes of transport and tell you how long it'll
take (kinda important for when you have to get from your hotel to the
station to get your train home), taking into account your preferences
for number of changes, how far to walk etc.

Add to that travelling in a foreign country, where you might not be able
to read things like "this station is closed at weekends" or "北京地铁",
and you will see that an application running on your phone in your
language is clearly better than a map.

I recommend this one http://metro.nanika.net/.

--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information

Your call is important to me. To see if it's important to
you I'm going to make you wait on hold for five minutes.
All calls are recorded for blackmail and amusement purposes.

David Cantrell August 21st 12 11:19 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:40:23PM +0100, Paul Corfield wrote:

Wi-fi would need to be completely free and available everywhere on the
network before you could contemplate using a phone.


Or use 3G/EDGE/GPRS. You need to figure out your route before going to
the platform anyway - after all, if you don't do that, you won't know
which station to start at or which line you want. And you might find
that you're better taking a bus.

Provided that you sort it out in advance with your cellco it need not be
expensive even when you're abroad.

--
David Cantrell | Hero of the Information Age

One person can change the world, but most of the time they shouldn't
-- Marge Simpson

[email protected] August 21st 12 11:21 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:57:15 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
If you'd actually used a journey planner, you would know that you are
talking about something completely different. A mere map can't include
all the buses, or know how frequent they are, and how frequent all the
trains are, or which lines are open, and so be able to find the best
route for you across all modes of transport and tell you how long it'll
take (kinda important for when you have to get from your hotel to the
station to get your train home), taking into account your preferences
for number of changes, how far to walk etc.


You're assuming any information you'll get on your phone will be up to date.
Having used travel websites myself I suspect the chances of that always
being the case are slim.

Add to that travelling in a foreign country, where you might not be able
to read things like "this station is closed at weekends" or "北京地铁",
and you will see that an application running on your phone in your
language is clearly better than a map.


Fine, but that means you're relying on a device that could be lost, stolen,
have no connection or a flat battery. Then what? Pidgin english with the
nearest local who looks like he might know when the next bus shows?

B2003


David Cantrell August 22nd 12 10:30 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:21:55AM +0000, d wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:57:15 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
If you'd actually used a journey planner, you would know that you are
talking about something completely different. A mere map can't include
all the buses, or know how frequent they are, and how frequent all the
trains are, or which lines are open, and so be able to find the best
route for you across all modes of transport and tell you how long it'll
take (kinda important for when you have to get from your hotel to the
station to get your train home), taking into account your preferences
for number of changes, how far to walk etc.

You're assuming any information you'll get on your phone will be up to date.


It has been every time I've used the application I recommended, and if
it turns out that, for example, the Northern line is closed, then I can
just tell the application to not use it.

Add to that travelling in a foreign country, where you might not be able
to read things like "this station is closed at weekends" or "北京地铁",
and you will see that an application running on your phone in your
language is clearly better than a map.

Fine, but that means you're relying on a device that could be lost


That's your own stupid fault

stolen,


As is that, usually.

have no connection


Not likely in any place with a significant transport network.

or a flat battery.


I forget when was the last time I was foolish enough to let my phone's
battery run out when I needed it. Years ago, at any rate.

Then what? Pidgin english with the
nearest local who looks like he might know when the next bus shows?


Sure. That might even work when *you* are lost abroad and don't speak
the local language, because so many people speak English to some
degree. It won't work when a Chinese tourist who doesn't speak English
is lost in London, where no-one (yeah, yeah) speaks Chinese.

--
David Cantrell | Reality Engineer, Ministry of Information

Compromise: n: lowering my standards so you can meet them

[email protected] August 22nd 12 11:10 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:30:13 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
Fine, but that means you're relying on a device that could be lost


That's your own stupid fault

stolen,


As is that, usually.


Thats as maybe, but given that the original suggestion was to replace maps
etc with apps on a smartphone then this has to be taken into account.

have no connection


Not likely in any place with a significant transport network.


It might not be down to lack of a network but lack of a roaming agreement
with your phone company. Also if they only offer 2G then good luck with
using anything web based and assuming free wifi will always be available as
an alternative is assuming rather a lot.

I forget when was the last time I was foolish enough to let my phone's
battery run out when I needed it. Years ago, at any rate.


If you use smartphones a lot the battery can go within a day which isn't much
use if you're spending the day away from the hotel. Unless you carry the
charger and adaptor everywhere you go and hope you can find a socket somewhere.

degree. It won't work when a Chinese tourist who doesn't speak English
is lost in London, where no-one (yeah, yeah) speaks Chinese.


If someone visits a country that doesn't speak a language they know and they
don't even bother to learn basic emergency phrases in the local lingo then
more fool them.

B2003



Neil Williams August 22nd 12 11:15 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
wrote:

If you use smartphones a lot the battery can go within a day which isn't much
use if you're spending the day away from the hotel.


I charge mine every night, but it rarely if ever needs more.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply

David Cantrell August 22nd 12 11:29 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 10:51:08AM +0000, d wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 11:40:50 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 08:36:50AM +0000,
d wrote:
Basil Jet wrote:
As we approach the point where everyone has a smart-phone, we might
Who is "everyone"? I don't, most of my family don't, a lot of my friends
don't. Don't confuse teenagers and hipsters with "everyone".

The key word "approach" should have told you that we're not there yet.

And what makes you think we will get there?


Simple economics. We are already at the point where nigh-on everyone
(91% of adults; 99% of people aged 25 to 34) has a mobile phone. The
price of manufacturing smartphones is dropping quickly (retail price,
unsubsidised, has already dropped from hundreds of pounds to tens of
pounds), and even at their current prices they are eating into the
market for dumbphones. A great many people who have dumbphones would
prefer to have a smartphone but are prevented from having them by cost.
Once almost everyone can afford a smartphone, or they start being given
away "for free" with a phone contract, the cost of manufacturing
tiny numbers of dumbphones for the handful of weirdos who still want one
will increase because there will be no economies of scale.

Already a quarter of adults have a smartphone and half of all teenagers.

And this is obviously for values of "everyone" which deliberately
doesn't consider the vanishingly small population of digital refuseniks,

You seem to be implying that not buying a smartphone is some kind of social
or political statement rather than the simple fact that some of us simply
don't need or want one and therefor don't see any reason to buy one.


It won't be long before it's hard to buy a dumbphone. At which point,
yes, not having a smartphone will indeed be a statement.

This is obvious. If you try to buy a *really* dumb phone, of the sort
that was common a decade ago - a Nokia 6310i, for example - you just
can't. It doesn't matter that there's still a small market for them,
they're just not made any more.

I don't
have a home surround sound system


Nor do most people.

or the latest core i7 PC for the same
reason - does that also make me a "refusenik" in your eyes?


Not having a computer of any kind would.

who will be economically and socially irrelevant just like those who

If you need to have a smartphone to be socially relevant then there's
something seriously wrong with your social life and probably social skills.


Have you not noticed how many businesses and other organisations assume
that their customers and members have mobile phones and email? I have,
mostly because my mother is one of the refuseniks.

Being socially relevant has nothing whatsoever to do with your social
life or skills, and everything to do with how others wish to interact
with you. If you choose not to be able to interact and take part in
activities in ways that people think are normal and convenient, then
you are socially irrelevant. An awful lot of groups these days rely on
email to contact their members, ranging from the local chess club to
patient support groups and political parties. Therefore if you refuse
to have email, you are removing yourself from that part of society and
that social interaction. Mobile phones aren't there yet, but I expect
that they will be soon.

To take one example, the British Go Association http://britgo.org/
recently stopped publishing its newsletter on paper and posting it to
members, and now distributes it by email. There are a handful of
members who don't have email, but that handful was deemed to not be
important enough to justify the costs of catering to their choice of not
having email.

And to be bring us back to what started you off on your foolish Luddite
ranting - navigating public transport networks - would you like to guess
which are the top three categories of paid-for content/applications on
phones? They a
* games
* music
* travel

So aside from entertainment, finding your way around is the most
important thing that people do with their smartphones that you can't do
with a dumbphone. The people have spoken.

--
David Cantrell | Official London Perl Mongers Bad Influence

EINE KIRCHE! EIN KREDO! EIN PAPST!

[email protected] August 22nd 12 01:04 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:34 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
price of manufacturing smartphones is dropping quickly (retail price,
unsubsidised, has already dropped from hundreds of pounds to tens of
pounds),


Depends. You can pick up some old symbian stuff for 90 quid but thats
about as low as it goes at the moment.

Once almost everyone can afford a smartphone, or they start being given
away "for free" with a phone contract, the cost of manufacturing


There are not being given away and they're not free as you well know or you
wouldn't have put it in quotes. Contracts cost a fortune and they get the
full retail price of the phone back and then some over the period.

tiny numbers of dumbphones for the handful of weirdos who still want one
will increase because there will be no economies of scale.


I think you'll find dumbphones are still pretty popular in many parts of
the world where basic communication, reliability and a long battery life is
more important than playing Angry Birds. Not only that, not everyone wants
to carry around a phone with the profile of a small brick. A lot of smartphones
are like going on a trip back to the early 90s in size.

Already a quarter of adults have a smartphone and half of all teenagers.


Got a link for that?

It won't be long before it's hard to buy a dumbphone. At which point,
yes, not having a smartphone will indeed be a statement.


Only in your mind. You seem to be unable to distinguish between a making
a statement and complete indifference.

or the latest core i7 PC for the same
reason - does that also make me a "refusenik" in your eyes?


Not having a computer of any kind would.


Why would it? Its quite possible to live without one. I couldn't because
I work in IT but I can quite see how others could.

with you. If you choose not to be able to interact and take part in
activities in ways that people think are normal and convenient, then


Facebook & twitter are not activities. Meeting down a pub or playing sports
is an activity. The former are poor facsimiles of a social life for losers
who don't actually have one.

And to be bring us back to what started you off on your foolish Luddite


Luddite? Having a smartphone seems to mean a lot to you, perhaps its a sort of
crutch or comfort blanket for some insecurities or inadequacies you have in
your social or professional life because it gives you the illusion of
connection. Either way you seem unable to comprehend why others may not give a
**** about owning an over priced hand held computer with no keyboard. Which is
your problem, not theirs.

which are the top three categories of paid-for content/applications on
phones? They a
* games


Don't care, I'm not 15.

* music


Don't care.

* travel


Can use a proper computer for that or visit a travel agents.
That really the best you've got?

with a dumbphone. The people have spoken.


No, you have spoken and I suspect your apparent addiction to tech like any
addiction makes your judgement unreliable at the best of times. If poking
and prodding your iToy all the time like a wired up lab rat makes you happy
then good for you. For others like me I'm afraid you come across as just a
little bit sad.

B2003




Jarle H Knudsen August 22nd 12 01:57 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 22 Aug 2012 11:15:55 GMT, Neil Williams wrote:

wrote:

If you use smartphones a lot the battery can go within a day which isn't much
use if you're spending the day away from the hotel.


I charge mine every night, but it rarely if ever needs more.


I need about two and half charges a day on my Samsung Galaxy S II, so I
carry extra batteries and have a separate battery charger. Problem solved.

--
jhk

Mike Bristow August 22nd 12 02:04 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
In article ,
d wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:34 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
price of manufacturing smartphones is dropping quickly (retail price,
unsubsidised, has already dropped from hundreds of pounds to tens of
pounds),


Depends. You can pick up some old symbian stuff for 90 quid but thats
about as low as it goes at the moment.



10 seconds on amzazon found (I literally searched for android 3g
phone and picked, I think, the thrid option)

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Unlocked-Qua...dp/B008ITLOB4/

Which is (just!) below a hundred quid. I expect some slightly more dedicated
searching will find something cheaper.

I think you'll find dumbphones are still pretty popular in many parts of
the world where basic communication, reliability and a long battery life is
more important than playing Angry Birds.


Indeed; I have one myself for the battery life and small size. And a
smartphone. Horses for courses, innit?



--
Mike Bristow


[email protected] August 22nd 12 02:47 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:57:10 +0200
Jarle H Knudsen wrote:
On 22 Aug 2012 11:15:55 GMT, Neil Williams wrote:

wrote:

If you use smartphones a lot the battery can go within a day which isn't

much
use if you're spending the day away from the hotel.


I charge mine every night, but it rarely if ever needs more.


I need about two and half charges a day on my Samsung Galaxy S II, so I
carry extra batteries and have a separate battery charger. Problem solved.


Meanwhile my Nokia dumbphone will go a week on a single charge in normal use.

B2003



[email protected] August 22nd 12 03:49 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 15:04:09 +0100
Mike Bristow wrote:
Which is (just!) below a hundred quid. I expect some slightly more dedicated
searching will find something cheaper.


For 2nd hand stuff almost certainly. For new stuff from a well known
manufacturer, maybe, maybe not.

Indeed; I have one myself for the battery life and small size. And a
smartphone. Horses for courses, innit?


Apart from not needing one the other main reason I don't have a smartphone is
size. I don't want to go back to a 1990s style brick in my pocket.

B2003



Someone Somewhere August 22nd 12 04:30 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 22/08/2012 14:04, d wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:34 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
price of manufacturing smartphones is dropping quickly (retail price,
unsubsidised, has already dropped from hundreds of pounds to tens of
pounds),


Depends. You can pick up some old symbian stuff for 90 quid but thats
about as low as it goes at the moment.

So this article is a complete work of fabrication and lies:

http://www.reghardware.com/2012/08/2...ndroid_phones/




Roland Perry August 22nd 12 04:50 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
In message , at 08:50:24 on Tue, 21 Aug
2012, d remarked:

That works if there is a turn-up and go service everywhere, or the map


Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


When does that kick in... 4tph? I'm sure we can find a 3tph Metro.
--
Roland Perry

Paul Scott[_3_] August 22nd 12 05:18 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
...
In message , at 08:50:24 on Tue, 21 Aug
2012, d remarked:

That works if there is a turn-up and go service everywhere, or the map


Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


When does that kick in... 4tph? I'm sure we can find a 3tph Metro.


In another thread, boltar is complaining that the ELL cannot be considered
turn up and go because the trains don't run every 1-2mins, that's about 40
tph.

I doubt 4 tph is going to cut it with boltar...

Paul S


Bruce[_2_] August 22nd 12 05:42 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
Jarle H Knudsen wrote:

On 22 Aug 2012 11:15:55 GMT, Neil Williams wrote:

wrote:

If you use smartphones a lot the battery can go within a day which isn't much
use if you're spending the day away from the hotel.


I charge mine every night, but it rarely if ever needs more.


I need about two and half charges a day on my Samsung Galaxy S II, so I
carry extra batteries and have a separate battery charger. Problem solved.



I found my HTC smartphone needed more than one charge a day so I
bought an aftermarket battery with 50% more capacity which, although
slightly bigger, still just fits in the battery compartment. It gave
the phone the extra time needed so I only charged it once a day.

But what made the biggest difference was upgrading the Google OS to
4.0 Ice Cream Sandwich. Power management is much better and I can get
two days out of one charge as long as I avoid a couple of apps that
are particularly power hungry.



Michael R N Dolbear August 22nd 12 06:00 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
David Cantrell wrote i

This is obvious. If you try to buy a *really* dumb phone, of the

sort
that was common a decade ago - a Nokia 6310i, for example - you just
can't. It doesn't matter that there's still a small market for them,
they're just not made any more.


You may have to buy a ruggedised phone ?

But some people need phones with no camera because they visit or work
in places where no such devices get past the security perimeter and
have been able to find them.

--
Mike D



Richard August 22nd 12 07:08 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:50:50 +0100, Roland Perry
wrote:

In message , at 08:50:24 on Tue, 21 Aug
2012, d remarked:

That works if there is a turn-up and go service everywhere, or the map


Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


When does that kick in... 4tph? I'm sure we can find a 3tph Metro.


I think I can do a bit better than that.

The Summer timetable on the "metro" in Palma (Mallorca) is a whole *1*
tph. The usual service is 4 tph with 2 tph for the first and last
hour, and half that at weekends. Just shows that it is only really
there for the university.

Richard.

Arthur Figgis August 22nd 12 07:35 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 21/08/2012 10:18, Neil Williams wrote:
wrote:

Is there a metro system in the world that isn't turn up and go?


Merseyrail on a Sunday. The S Bahn Stuttgart.


You might have had a fair wait at Shoreditch if you weren't careful.

I'm pretty certain events-only stations exist at places like sports
stadia. I think Ulm has a tram branch to a conference centre. Depending
what counts as a metro, I think there are S-bahn branded rail services
which are hourly, perhaps even every 2 h, which might catch out someone
who is used to a Berlin-style operation. Southern "metro" services to
Epsom Downs are hourly, although I'm not sure I have ever heard anyone
outside Southern use the term.

--
Arthur Figgis Surrey, UK

Eric[_3_] August 22nd 12 09:29 PM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On 2012-08-22, David Cantrell wrote:
...
There are a handful of members who don't have email, but that handful
was deemed to not be important enough to justify the costs of catering
to their choice of not having email.


Discrimination, pure and simple. They are saying "we don't care who you
are or how long you've been here or what contribution you have made or
could make, if you don't have email we don't care about you". Nice. Not
having email is not necessarily a matter of choice.

Eric
--
ms fnd in a lbry

[email protected] August 23rd 12 08:45 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:30:04 +0100
Someone Somewhere wrote:
On 22/08/2012 14:04, d wrote:
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:29:34 +0100
David Cantrell wrote:
price of manufacturing smartphones is dropping quickly (retail price,
unsubsidised, has already dropped from hundreds of pounds to tens of
pounds),


Depends. You can pick up some old symbian stuff for 90 quid but thats
about as low as it goes at the moment.

So this article is a complete work of fabrication and lies:

http://www.reghardware.com/2012/08/2...ndroid_phones/


Fair enough, I was just going by what I'd seen in some phone shops
recently when the wife was looking for something.

B2003



[email protected] August 23rd 12 08:47 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 18:18:05 +0100
"Paul Scott" wrote:
In another thread, boltar is complaining that the ELL cannot be considered
turn up and go because the trains don't run every 1-2mins, that's about 40
tph.

I doubt 4 tph is going to cut it with boltar...


Not really. Though the utterly hopeless service to JFK airport on the
NYC subway probably had something similar though its been years since I've
been there so maybe its improved.

B2003


[email protected] August 23rd 12 08:53 AM

Underground Maps Unravelled
 
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:08:05 +0100
Richard wrote:
The Summer timetable on the "metro" in Palma (Mallorca) is a whole *1*
tph. The usual service is 4 tph with 2 tph for the first and last
hour, and half that at weekends. Just shows that it is only really
there for the university.


Given its a small town on a small island that really has no business having
a metro in the first place I'll let them off. Still, its nice to see where
spain wasted all its euros. Another good example is the Bulnes Funicular
in the picos europa. Its entirely underground, must have cost a bloody
fortune to build since its all tunnelled through granite and runs from nowhere
to a small village consisting of 2 cafes and 3 donkeys. Its not even a
skiing area so they can't even get their money back in winter. Unbelievable.
Nice ride though!

B2003




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:41 AM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk