Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Perry" wrote in message
... Presumably it's the Piccadilly that's under York Rd, then? AFAIK the Picc is under the mainline from Kings Cross to Finsbury Park inclusive. (Which is stupid, because it's obvious that they should have built it under Caledonian Road...) -- John Rowland - Spamtrapped Transport Plans for the London Area, updated 2001 http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Acro...69/tpftla.html A man's vehicle is a symbol of his manhood. That's why my vehicle's the Piccadilly Line - It's the size of a county and it comes every two and a half minutes |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , John Rowland
writes AFAIK the Picc is under the mainline from Kings Cross to Finsbury Park inclusive. (Which is stupid, because it's obvious that they should have built it under Caledonian Road...) The line might be (most of the way) but afaik the *station* is under York Rd. Easier to build there than under platform 1, for example. -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , John Rowland
writes AFAIK the Picc is under the mainline from Kings Cross to Finsbury Park inclusive. (Which is stupid, because it's obvious that they should have built it under Caledonian Road...) Putting it under the main line gives more room for necessary deviations than trying to put it under the road. And the GNP&BR was in cahoots with the GNR anyway (that's why it ended at Finsbury Park). -- Clive D.W. Feather, writing for himself | Home: Tel: +44 20 8495 6138 (work) | Web: http://www.davros.org Fax: +44 870 051 9937 | Work: Written on my laptop; please observe the Reply-To address |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
John Rowland:
AFAIK the Picc is under the mainline from Kings Cross to Finsbury Park inclusive. (Which is stupid, because it's obvious that they should have built it under Caledonian Road...) Clive Feather: Putting it under the main line gives more room for necessary deviations than trying to put it under the road. And the GNP&BR was in cahoots with the GNR anyway (that's why it ended at Finsbury Park). Who are you and what have you done with the real Clive Feather? It was the *GN&SR* that was in cahoots with the GNR; that's why their preferred routing, which Parliament approved, ran under the GNR from King's Cross to *Wood Green*. Then the GNR lost interest in supporting the GN&SR and it was bought up by Yerkes group, specifically the B&PCR, eventually to be merged with it as the GNP&BR. But it was a condition of that sale that the powers to build from Finsbury Park to Wood Green *inclusive* be abandoned -- the GNR would build and own the Finsbury Park terminus and retain a veto on northward extension. In other words, the reason the GNP&BR ended at Finsbury Park was that it was *no longer* in cahoots with the GNR. (This is also why the GN&CR ended at Finsbury Park, when that was its name.) -- Mark Brader, Toronto | "When I wanted to be a sigquote, that wasn't | the one I was thinking of." --Clive Feather My text in this article is in the public domain. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
CTRL | London Transport | |||
CTRL | London Transport | |||
CTRL | London Transport | |||
CTRL Section 2 aerial photos | London Transport | |||
Is the CTRL the first new railway in Britian since 1900? | London Transport |