Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 09:08:52 +0000, Roland Perry wrote:
125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 11:10:49 on
Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: 125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). Then there's another set of stations with stairs in between the escalators. Marble Arch as an example? -- Roland Perry |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:16:08 +0000, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 11:10:49 on Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: 125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , at 14:03:57 on
Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. I presume those would exit via the original entrance, which is some way round the corner from the present one. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. "Stairs only" is an unusual requirement, but I agree that information to deliver it is hard to find. -- Roland Perry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Walters" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:16:08 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 11:10:49 on Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: 125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. I can understand why someone might want to avoid lifts, But what possible (disability) reason is there for wanting to avoid escalators but are able to use stairs? tim |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 18:49:37 -0000, tim..... wrote:
"David Walters" wrote in message ... If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. I can understand why someone might want to avoid lifts, But what possible (disability) reason is there for wanting to avoid escalators but are able to use stairs? The only disability reason for wanting to avoid lifts I can think of is claustrophobia. People might equally have a phobia of escalators (is there a name for that?), they can be fairly dangerous machines and have removed a toe from a user from time to time. I think that concern would be better addressed by wearing stout shoes but phobias aren't always very rational like that. I have my own slightly silly reasons for wanting to avoid lifts and escalators. I don't really think TfL should go out of their way to provide me with information to help but I thought I might find something on the Internet. So far I haven't. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/01/2013 18:49, tim..... wrote:
"David Walters" wrote in message ... On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 13:16:08 +0000, Roland Perry wrote: In message , at 11:10:49 on Thu, 10 Jan 2013, David Walters remarked: 125. Nineteen stations just use lifts. They have stairs as well. A list I've been looking for but haven't been able to find is stations, or platforms really, that don't have publicly accessible stairs. I've always understood that every station with "only" lifts also has emergency stairs (that may not be well signposted for regular use). And also some stations still have the stairs despite now being fitted with escalators (TCR springs to mind). I think that is true but some stations have escalators and no fixed stairs, assuming everything is working. The stairs at Angel still seem to be present but I think I'd cause a disturbance if I exited the platforms that way. If you have a desire to avoid lifts and escalators then a lot of the underground is off limits and it is very hard to plan a route with available information. I can understand why someone might want to avoid lifts, But what possible (disability) reason is there for wanting to avoid escalators but are able to use stairs? As someone I know was asking just last week, in order to take a dog who is too heavy to carry. It is VERY hard to get info on stations which ONLY offer escalators (in order that he can avoid them). |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 10 Jan 2013 19:52:04 +0000
Paul Corfield wrote: I've certainly seen some people - old and young - really struggle to coordinate their arms and legs to get on and off an escalator. They almost cause accidents through their hesitancy. Most women seem almost completely incapable of walking off the end of an escalator normally. B2003 |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:22:30 +0000
Basil Jet wrote: On 2013\01\11 09:52, d wrote: Most women seem almost completely incapable of walking off the end of an escalator normally. Most women or most women in high heels? Most women regardless of footwear if the ones who use the tube are anything to go by. B2003 |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Has anyone received their tickets for the Tube 150 event? | London Transport | |||
The truth about Boris's London cycle hire scheme - Daily Telegraph | London Transport | |||
[OT] 12 of the worlds most fascinating tunnel networks | London Transport | |||
Neasden Depot facts and figures? | London Transport | |||
That new station - the facts | London Transport |