London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 10:08 AM
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Apr 2013
Posts: 6
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roland Perry View Post
In message , at 22:58:54 on Mon, 15 Apr
2013, Mizter T remarked:
I will certainly send a
registered mail rather than the normal royal mail


It's called "Special Delivery" now.


Not necessarily.

"Signed For", aka Recorded delivery.
http://www.royalmail.com/personal/uk...-for-1st-class
http://www.royalmail.com/personal/uk...gned-2nd-class

Rather cheaper than SD.


Signed-for is the replacement for Recorded Delivery; the OP was looking
for Registered, which has been replaced by SD.
--
Roland Perry
Thanks all for the suggestion.
Just sent at a post office: it is called Royal Mail recorded 1st or 2nd class, Signed for. This is the standard postal service with signature and barcode scanning on delivery.
Now I am waiting for the MPS to reply and hopefully with a confirmation letter.

  #12   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 02:52 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

In message , at 11:08:12 on Wed, 17
Apr 2013, jaychiu remarked:
Just sent at a post office: it is called Royal Mail recorded 1st or 2nd
class, Signed for. This is the standard postal service with signature
and barcode scanning on delivery.


That's just normal mail with confirmation it arrived. It's no less
likely to get lost en-route.
--
Roland Perry
  #13   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 04:25 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2004
Posts: 96
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

On 2013-04-17 14:52:31 +0000, Roland Perry said:

In message , at 11:08:12 on Wed, 17
Apr 2013, jaychiu remarked:
Just sent at a post office: it is called Royal Mail recorded 1st or 2nd
class, Signed for. This is the standard postal service with signature
and barcode scanning on delivery.


That's just normal mail with confirmation it arrived. It's no less
likely to get lost en-route.


But considerably less likely to be lost by the recipient.

  #14   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 04:47 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

In message 2013041717250738867-ken@birchangercom, at 17:25:07 on Wed,
17 Apr 2013, Ken Wheatley remarked:

Just sent at a post office: it is called Royal Mail recorded 1st or 2nd
class, Signed for. This is the standard postal service with signature
and barcode scanning on delivery.

That's just normal mail with confirmation it arrived. It's no less
likely to get lost en-route.


But considerably less likely to be lost by the recipient.


I'm not so sure. When the postman delivers a whole bag of mail to a
large user, don't you think he just crosses off all the "Recorded" items
that are believed to be enclosed, without individually correlating them.
At that point all the post is the same to the recipient, and indeed most
post-rooms will dispose of all the envelopes and lose the very fact it
was sent "signed for".
--
Roland Perry
  #15   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 05:14 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 17:25:07 +0100, Ken Wheatley wrote:

Just sent at a post office: it is called Royal Mail recorded 1st or
2nd class, Signed for. This is the standard postal service with
signature and barcode scanning on delivery.


That's just normal mail with confirmation it arrived. It's no less
likely to get lost en-route.


But considerably less likely to be lost by the recipient.


Not really. Signing will be done before post actually enters the office's
internal systems - and that's where "losing" is most likely to happen.

The serviced offices my company used to be in often had registered
letters for companies who were no longer there, sat on the side next to
the pigeon holes - usually still with the sticker attached, so unsigned-
for...


  #16   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 06:31 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,796
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

Roland Perry wrote:

I'm not so sure. When the postman delivers a whole bag of mail to a large
user, don't you think he just crosses off all the "Recorded" items that
are believed to be enclosed, without individually correlating them. At
that point all the post is the same to the recipient, and indeed most
post-rooms will dispose of all the envelopes and lose the very fact it
was sent "signed for".


I doubt it, as the signature must be recorded. While I can't remember if
it was recorded or registered, probably the latter, I did get a company
(Psion, in fact, might as well mention them seeing as they are no longer
around) to accept that they had received a parcel containing a faulty
Series 5 palmtop (worth around 400 quid at the time) even though they had
somehow lost it, because the signature was recalled from the Royal Mail and
they found out who had signed for it. As a result I received a brand new
unit at no cost to me.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply.
  #17   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 06:31 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,796
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

Adrian wrote:

Not really. Signing will be done before post actually enters the office's
internal systems - and that's where "losing" is most likely to happen.


True, though depending on what the communication contains it's quite
possible that the company having received it will suffice.

Neil
--
Neil Williams in Milton Keynes, UK. Put first name before the at to reply.
  #18   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 07:04 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Oct 2004
Posts: 947
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

On Wed, 17 Apr 2013 18:31:58 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:

Not really. Signing will be done before post actually enters the
office's internal systems - and that's where "losing" is most likely to
happen.


True, though depending on what the communication contains it's quite
possible that the company having received it will suffice.


Except that the para you snipped included a practical real-world example
of registered post not always reaching the company, and not always being
signed for when it does.
  #19   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 07:44 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Aug 2003
Posts: 10,125
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

In message

..net, at 18:31:58 on Wed, 17 Apr 2013, Neil Williams
remarked:
I'm not so sure. When the postman delivers a whole bag of mail to a large
user, don't you think he just crosses off all the "Recorded" items that
are believed to be enclosed, without individually correlating them. At
that point all the post is the same to the recipient, and indeed most
post-rooms will dispose of all the envelopes and lose the very fact it
was sent "signed for".


I doubt it, as the signature must be recorded. While I can't remember if
it was recorded or registered, probably the latter,


Registered is much more authoritative than Recorded.

--
Roland Perry
  #20   Report Post  
Old April 17th 13, 08:33 PM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: May 2007
Posts: 1,139
Default Confirmation/Evidence of Traffic Diversion

....But Psion machines are still used on the Underground.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tottenham Court Road Station... there is already evidence ofCrossrail 2 Basil Jet[_4_] London Transport 4 January 19th 16 01:52 PM
Kilburn bus diversion John Rowland London Transport 0 May 15th 06 09:18 AM
Verney Junction diversion subterraneo London Transport 32 January 25th 06 08:34 AM
Bus diversion due to closure of Battersea Bridge [email protected] London Transport 41 September 28th 05 02:16 PM
traffic is better, but livingstone is thinking of more traffic zone? [email protected] London Transport 0 March 16th 05 01:46 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:59 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017