|
Tube stats remashed
|
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 18:55:48
on Sun, 26 Jan 2014, remarked: http://oobrien.com/2014/01/london-tube-stats http://casa.oobrien.com/tube "Top 10 journeys from this station typical day (RODS 2012 data)" - anyone found anywhere to beat the 24679 at Bank for Waterloo? Next biggest I can see is Canary Wharf-Waterloo (9748). Waterloo looks to have the largest annual entries and exits too (88M in 2012). Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
In article , (Roland Perry)
wrote: In message , at 18:55:48 on Sun, 26 Jan 2014, remarked: http://oobrien.com/2014/01/london-tube-stats http://casa.oobrien.com/tube "Top 10 journeys from this station typical day (RODS 2012 data)" - anyone found anywhere to beat the 24679 at Bank for Waterloo? Next biggest I can see is Canary Wharf-Waterloo (9748). Except that you have missed the reverse Waterloo flow to Bank of 21801. Waterloo looks to have the largest annual entries and exits too (88M in 2012). Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. Yes, that baffled me too. Shopalolics? -- Colin Rosenstiel |
Tube stats remashed
|
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 03:17:25
on Mon, 27 Jan 2014, remarked: "Top 10 journeys from this station typical day (RODS 2012 data)" - anyone found anywhere to beat the 24679 at Bank for Waterloo? Next biggest I can see is Canary Wharf-Waterloo (9748). Except that you have missed the reverse Waterloo flow to Bank of 21801. I saw that, but didn't think it necessary to comment. -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 03:17:25
on Mon, 27 Jan 2014, remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. Yes, that baffled me too. Shopalolics? 2012 figures, so it would have been during the Olympics and the first full year of Westfield. Be interesting to compare previous and subsequent years. Another odd one: London Bridge runner-up from Queensway. -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 09:27:08 on Mon, 27
Jan 2014, Clive D. W. Feather remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. Yes, that baffled me too. Shopalolics? I've found that, when it's more than just me, the cheapest and easiest way to have a day in London is to drive down the M11, park at the shopping centre, and then catch the tube or DLR from Stratford. I suspect I'm not alone in this. There is, however, no similar "strange flow" to Stratford from other stations in the vicinity. You have to look at stations on the Central Line (like Bond St and Holborn) to get even as high as a poor #4, with volumes well below Knightsbridge despite being on a direct line. -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
On 2014\01\27 08:42, Roland Perry wrote:
In message , at 18:55:48 on Sun, 26 Jan 2014, remarked: http://oobrien.com/2014/01/london-tube-stats http://casa.oobrien.com/tube "Top 10 journeys from this station typical day (RODS 2012 data)" - anyone found anywhere to beat the 24679 at Bank for Waterloo? Next biggest I can see is Canary Wharf-Waterloo (9748). Waterloo looks to have the largest annual entries and exits too (88M in 2012). Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. That might be something to do with the Olympics. Anyway, hardly anyone living on the Bakerloo Line seems to have figured out that there's a cross-platform interchange to the Jubilee at Baker Street. Jubilee residents do marginally better for switching to the Bakerloo, perhaps because there were direct trains before 1979. But it still seems to be a poorly used interchange compared to Finsbury Park, Stockwell, Mile End and Euston. |
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 13:31:23 on
Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Basil Jet remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. That might be something to do with the Olympics. It seems unlikely that travel patterns for a couple of weeks would produce such a huge blip (the annualised flow is at least 5x what you'd expect from looking at other stations in the vicinity). -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
On Mon, 27 Jan 2014 14:02:31 +0000, Roland Perry
wrote: In message , at 13:31:23 on Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Basil Jet remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. That might be something to do with the Olympics. It seems unlikely that travel patterns for a couple of weeks would produce such a huge blip (the annualised flow is at least 5x what you'd expect from looking at other stations in the vicinity). The Olympics and Paralympics were about five weeks, plus there was plenty of Olympics-related traffic before and after the games themselves. |
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 15:27:53 on
Mon, 27 Jan 2014, Recliner remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. That might be something to do with the Olympics. It seems unlikely that travel patterns for a couple of weeks would produce such a huge blip (the annualised flow is at least 5x what you'd expect from looking at other stations in the vicinity). The Olympics and Paralympics were about five weeks, plus there was plenty of Olympics-related traffic before and after the games themselves. Still not enough to boost the annual ridership figures compared to adjacent stations. You are talking about around half a million extra trips *for that exact pair of stations* crammed into 5 weeks. The more I think about this, the more I suppose it must be a typo. -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
In message , at 16:15:24 on Mon, 27 Jan
2014, Roland Perry remarked: Some fascinating flows, who would guess that Stratford was the #1 destination from Knightsbridge. That might be something to do with the Olympics. It seems unlikely that travel patterns for a couple of weeks would produce such a huge blip (the annualised flow is at least 5x what you'd expect from looking at other stations in the vicinity). The Olympics and Paralympics were about five weeks, plus there was plenty of Olympics-related traffic before and after the games themselves. Still not enough to boost the annual ridership figures compared to adjacent stations. You are talking about around half a million extra trips *for that exact pair of stations* crammed into 5 weeks. The more I think about this, the more I suppose it must be a typo. Looking at the dis-aggregated figures (which don't have any A-B numbers but still purport to show relative numbers with different-sized circles) the only time that Stratford looks interesting, ie could perhaps be near the top of the table rather than some way down, is: Weekday early entry (but itself a tiny proportion of the total) -- Roland Perry |
Tube stats remashed
|
Tube stats remashed
|
Tube stats remashed
On 2014-01-27 18:09:04 +0000, Basil Jet said:
On 2014\01\27 17:44, wrote: Thereby proving that 35% of statistics are wrong. Is that all? I would have thought it was more like 40% or 105%. No, 110%. E. |
Tube stats remashed
"eastender" wrote in message news:201401262349108838-nospam@nospamcom... http://oobrien.com/2014/01/london-tube-stats can't make it work on IE8 tim |
Tube stats remashed
|
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:31 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2006 LondonBanter.co.uk