London Transport (uk.transport.london) Discussion of all forms of transport in London.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #13   Report Post  
Old May 16th 14, 12:45 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Dec 2013
Posts: 84
Default Investigation under way after Tube train collision

On Wed, 14 May 2014 03:59:03 -0500,
wrote:

In article ,

(Aurora) wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:48:15 -0500,
wrote:

In article ,

(Aurora) wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2014 02:28:12 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
wrote:

On Mon, 12 May 2014 21:38:23 -0700, Aurora wrote:

The S7 stock is some of the widest to ever operate in the UK. When
Network Rail, or their predecessors, has operated stock with new
kinetic envelope characteristics they have been known to cobble
together a gauging vehicle and move it over the intended routes
taking measurements. Is it within TfL's wit to carry out such an
exercise?

It's no wider than other LU surface stock apart from the C-stock.

"D Stock is 9' 4" wide. "S Stock" is 9' 7" wide. While the "S Stock"
is shorter, its kinetic envelope will be different. TfL have also had
problems with the "gap" at some circle line platforms.

That's because of the lower S stock floor height surely? The width issue
for D stock will be the car length and not just the width too. What is
the C stock width?


Much to my surprise C Stock is 9 ft 7 in wide. One lives and learns.


and is widest from solebar level to waist height, surely?


If your implication is that, the envelope for the S7 stock was
therefore known beforehand? I beg to differ. Other factors come into
play, the car length, how far inboard are the trucks (that would be
bogies in your parish's English) and the profile of the car ends.

Certainly it never hurts to carefully consider the characteristics of
the route in relation to the rolling stock.


--

http://www.dennismillerradio.com/ The DMZ.
  #14   Report Post  
Old May 16th 14, 02:01 AM posted to uk.transport.london
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity at LondonBanter: Sep 2008
Posts: 4,877
Default Investigation under way after Tube train collision

In article ,
(Aurora) wrote:

On Wed, 14 May 2014 03:59:03 -0500,
wrote:

In article ,

(Aurora) wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2014 13:48:15 -0500,

wrote:

In article ,
(Aurora) wrote:

On Tue, 13 May 2014 02:28:12 -0500, Christopher A. Lee
wrote:

On Mon, 12 May 2014 21:38:23 -0700, Aurora
wrote:

The S7 stock is some of the widest to ever operate in the UK. When
Network Rail, or their predecessors, has operated stock with new
kinetic envelope characteristics they have been known to cobble
together a gauging vehicle and move it over the intended routes
taking measurements. Is it within TfL's wit to carry out such an
exercise?

It's no wider than other LU surface stock apart from the C-stock.

"D Stock is 9' 4" wide. "S Stock" is 9' 7" wide. While the "S
Stock" is shorter, its kinetic envelope will be different. TfL have
also had problems with the "gap" at some circle line platforms.

That's because of the lower S stock floor height surely? The width
issue for D stock will be the car length and not just the width too.
What is the C stock width?

Much to my surprise C Stock is 9 ft 7 in wide. One lives and learns.


and is widest from solebar level to waist height, surely?


If your implication is that, the envelope for the S7 stock was
therefore known beforehand? I beg to differ. Other factors come into
play, the car length, how far inboard are the trucks (that would be
bogies in your parish's English) and the profile of the car ends.


Not really, just that it wasn't as different from its predecessor as implied
earlier. We have been told the main problem was that the track was out of
position anyway.

Certainly it never hurts to carefully consider the characteristics of
the route in relation to the rolling stock.


That wouldn't have helped if the testing hadn't covered the particular track
while it was out of position.

--
Colin Rosenstiel


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
RAIB Investigation into an incident at Warren Street station, Victoria Line, London Underground, 11 July 2011 Mizter T London Transport 3 August 5th 11 03:49 PM
Tfl Formal Investigation Reports Mizter T London Transport 2 January 12th 11 09:51 PM
Tube Trains Sent On Collision Course Paul London Transport 63 September 29th 10 08:54 PM
[OT] Train collision in Philadelphia SEPTA TheOneKEA London Transport 0 May 15th 07 11:29 AM
HSE statement: Buncefield Oil Depot investigation GMails London Transport 0 December 16th 05 03:27 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 London Banter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about London Transport"

 

Copyright © 2017